Skip to main content
Log in

Classification of Codimension-One Riemann Solutions

  • Published:
Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate solutions of Riemann problems for systems of two conservation laws in one spatial dimension. Our approach is to organize Riemann solutions into strata of successively higher codimension. The codimension-zero stratum consists of Riemann solutions that are structurally stable: the number and types of waves in a solution are preserved under small perturbations of the flux function and initial data. Codimension-one Riemann solutions, which constitute most of the boundary of the codimension-zero stratum, violate structural stability in a minimal way. At the codimension-one stratum, either the qualitative structure of Riemann solutions changes or solutions fail to be parameterized smoothly by the flux function and the initial data. In this paper, we give an overview of the phenomena associated with codimension-one Riemann solutions. We list the different kinds of codimension-one solutions, and we classify them according to their geometric properties, their roles in solving Riemann problems, and their relationships to wave curves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Azevedo, A., Marchesin, D., Plohr, B., and Zumbrun, K. (1996). Nonuniqueness of non-classical solutions of Riemann problems. Z. angew. Math. Phys. 47, 977-998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Furtado, F. (1989). Structural Stability of Nonlinear Waves for Conservation Laws, Ph.D. thesis, New York University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Golubitsky, M., and Schaeffer, D. (1984). Singularities and Groups in Bifurcation Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg-Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Isaacson, E., Marchesin, D., Palmeira, C. F., and Plohr, B. (1992). A global formalism for nonlinear waves in conservation laws. Comm. Math. Phys. 146, 505-552.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Isaacson, E., Marchesin, D., Plohr, B., and Temple, J. B. (1992). Multiphase flow models with singular Riemann problems. Mat. Aplic. Comput. 11, 147-166.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Keyfitz, B., and Kranzer, H. (1980). A system of non-strictly hyperbolic conservation laws arising in elasticity theory. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 72, 219-241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Keyfitz, B., and Kranzer, H. (1989). A viscosity approximation to a system of conserva-tion laws with no classical Riemann solution. Nonlinear Hyperbolic Problems, Lect. Notes Math., Vol. 1402, Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg-Berlin, pp. 185-197.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kokubu, H. (1988). Homoclinic and heteroclinic bifurcations of vector fields. Japan J. Appl. Math. 5, 455-501.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Korchinski, D. (1977). Solution of a Riemann Problem for a 2 x 2 System of Conservation Laws Possessing no Classical Weak Solution, Ph.D. thesis, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lax, P. (1957). Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws II. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 10, 537-566.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, T.-P. (1974). The Riemann problem for general 2 x 2 conservation laws. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 199, 89-112.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marchesin, D., and Paes-Leme, P. J. (1983). Riemann problems for inhomogeneous hyper-bolic equations for fluids, Proc. 14th Brazil. Colloq. Math., Vol. 2, IMPA, pp. 273-299.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schaeffer, D., Schecter, S., and Shearer, M. (1993). Nonstrictly hyperbolic conservation laws with a parabolic line. J. Diff. Eqs. 103, 94-126.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schaeffer, D., and Shearer, M. (1987). The classification of 2 x 2 systems of non-strictly hyperbolic conservation laws, with application to oil recovery. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 40, 141-178.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schaeffer, D., and Shearer, M. (1987). Riemann problems for nonstrictly hyperbolic 2 x 2 systems of conservation laws. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 304, 267-306.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schecter, S. (1993). Numerical computation of saddle-node homoclinic bifurcation points. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 30, 1155-1178.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schecter, S., Marchesin, D., and Plohr, B. (1996). Structurally stable Riemann solutions. J. Diff. Eqs. 126, 303-354.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shearer, M. (1986). Nonuniqueness of admissible solutions of Riemann initial value problems for a system of conservation laws of mixed type. Arch. Rational Mech. 93, 45-59.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shearer, M., Schaeffer, D., Marchesin, D., and Paes-Leme, P. (1987). Solution of the Riemann problem for a prototype 2 x 2 system of non-strictly hyperbolic conservation laws. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 97, 299-320.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Smoller, J. (1969). On the solution of the Riemann problem with general step data for an extended class of hyperbolic systems. Mich. Math. J. 16, 201-210.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Smoller, J. (1983). Shock Waves and Reaction-Diffusion Equations, Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg-Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tan, D., Zhang, T., and Zheng, Y. (1994). Delta-shock waves as limits of vanishing viscosity for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. J. Diff. Eqs. 112, 1-32.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wendroff, B. (1972). The Riemann problem for materials with non-convex equations of state: I. Isentropic flow; II. General flow. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 38, 454-466, 640-658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schecter, S., Plohr, B.J. & Marchesin, D. Classification of Codimension-One Riemann Solutions. Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations 13, 523–588 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016634307145

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016634307145

Navigation