Skip to main content
Log in

Vermiculture and waste management: study of action of earthworms Elsinia foetida, Eudrilus euginae and Perionyx excavatus on biodegradation of some community wastes in India and Australia

  • Published:
Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The practice of vermiculture is at least a century old but it is now being revived worldwide with diverse ecological objectives such as waste management, soil detoxification and regeneration and sustainable agriculture. Earthworms act in the soil as aerators, grinders, crushers, chemical degraders and biological stimulators. They secrete enzymes, proteases, lipases, amylases, cellulases and chitinases which bring about rapid biochemical conversion of the cellulosic and the proteinaceous materials in the variety of organic wastes which originate from homes, gardens, dairies and farms. The process is odour free because earthworms release coelomic fluids in the decaying waste biomass which has anti-bacterial properties which kills pathogens. The species used in India were Indian blue (Perionyx excavatus), African night crawler (Eudrilus euginae) and the Tiger worm (Elsinia foetida). E. foetida was used in Australia. E. euginae was found to have higher feeding, growth and biodegradation capacity compared to other two species.

Earthworm action was shown to enhance natural biodegradation and decomposition of wastes (60–80 percent under optimum conditions), thus significantly reducing the composting time by several weeks. Within 5 to 6 weeks, 95–100 percent degradation of all cellulosic materials was achieved. Even hard fruit and egg shells and bones can be degraded, although these may take longer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Agarwal, S. (1999) Vermiculture biotechnology for ecological degradation of kitchen wastes and growth of vegetable crops on thebiodegraded waste products (Vermicompost). PhD Thesis, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asadi, R. and Carretero, E. (2000)Biodegradation of kitchen wastes by earthworms Elsinia foetida. Project report, School of Environmental Engineering, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhawalkar, V. and Bhawalkar, U. (1994) Vermiculture Biotechnology. Pune, India: Pub. of BhawalkarEarthworm Research Institute (BERI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccanti, B. and Masciandaro G. (1999) Researchers study vermicomposting of municipal and paper millsludges. Biocycle Magazine, June.

  • Collier, J. (1978) Use of earthworms in sludge lagoons. In Utilization of Soil Organisms in SludgeManagement (R. Hartenstein, ed.), pp. 133–137. Virginia.

  • Dash, M.C. (1978) Role of earthworms in the decomposer system. InGlimpses of Ecology (J.S. Singh and B. Gopal, eds.), pp. 399–406. New Delhi: India International Scientific Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. (1971) Laboratory studies on the uptake of dieldrin and DDT by earthworms. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 3, 221–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C.A. (1988) Breakdown of animal, vegetable and industrial organic wastes by earthworms; In Earthworms in Waste and Environmental Management (C.A. Edwards and E.P. Neuhauser, eds.). The Hague, Netherlands: SPB Academic Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson, J. (2000) The worm' turn. Waste Management Magazine, August.

  • Graff, O. (1981) Preliminary experiment ofvermicomposting of different waste materials using Eudrilus euginae Kingberg. In Proceedings of the workshop on ‘Role of Earthworms in the Stabilization of Organic Residues’ (M. Appelhof, ed.), pp. 179–191. Michigan: Malanazoo Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunathilagraj, K. (1996)Earthworm: An Introduction. Coimbatore: Indian Council of Agricultural Research Training Program; Tamil Nadu Agriculture University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunathilagraj, K. and Ramesh, P.T. (1996) Degradation of coir wastes and tapoica peels by earthworms. In Training Program inVermiculture. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunathilagraj, K. and Ravignanam, T. (1996)Vermicomposting of sericultural wastes. Madras Agricultural Journal pp. 455–457.

  • Hand, P. (1988) Earthworm Biotechnology. InResources and Application of Biotechnology: The New Wave (Greenshields, R. ed.). MacMillan Press Ltd. US.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartenstein, R. and Bisesi, M.S. (1989) Use of earthworm biotechnology for the management of effluents from intensively housed livestock. Outlook Agriculture 18, 72–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, M.P. (1983) Heavy metals uptake in earthworms. Earthworm Ecology. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, R. (1991) Vermiculture: Scope for New Biotechnology. Calcutta: Zoological Survey of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, R., Bano, K. and Krishnamoorthy, R.V. (1982) Potential of Perionyx excavatus in utilization of organic wastes. Pedo-Biologia 23, 419–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, R., Seenappa, S.N. and Rao, J. (1993) Sugar Factory Refuse for the Production of Vermicompost and Worm Biomass. V InternationalSymposium on Earthworms, Ohio University.

  • Lotzof, M. (2000) Vermiculture: an Australian technology success story. Waste ManagementMagazine, February.

  • Pierre, V., Phillip, R., Margnerite, L. and Pierrette, C. (1982) Anti-bacterial activity of the haemolytic system from theearthworms Elsinia foetida andrei. Invertebrate Pathology 40, 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, J. (1997) Management of municipal urban wastes: someinnovative strategies. PhD Thesis, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seenappa, S.N. and Kale, R. (1993) Efficiency of earthwormEudrilus euginae in converting the solid wastes from the aromatic oil extraction units into vermicompost. Journal of IAEM 22, 267–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seenappa, S.N., Rao, J. and Kale, R. (1995) Conversion of distillery wastes into organic manure by earthworm Eudrilus euginae. Journal ofIAEM 22(3), 244–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senapati, B.K. (1992) Vermitechnology as an option for recycling of cellulose waste in India. In NewTrends in Biotechnology (Subba Rao, N.S., Balgopalan, C. and Raman Krishna, S.V., eds.), pp. 347–358. Oxford and IBH Pub. Co. Pvt. Ltd.

  • Sinha, R.K. (1996) Vermiculture biotechnology for waste management and sustainable agriculture. In Environmental Crisis and Human' atRisk (R.K. Sinha, ed.), pp. 233–240. India: INA Shree Publication.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sinha, R.K., Herat, S., Agarwal, S. et al. Vermiculture and waste management: study of action of earthworms Elsinia foetida, Eudrilus euginae and Perionyx excavatus on biodegradation of some community wastes in India and Australia. The Environmentalist 22, 261–268 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016583929723

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016583929723

Navigation