Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-scale landscape and seascape patterns associated with marbled murrelet nesting areas on the U.S. west coast

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Habitat for wide-ranging species should be addressed at multiple scales to fully understand factors that limit populations. The marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus), a threatened seabird, forages on the ocean and nests inland in large trees. We developed statistical relationships between murrelet use (occupancy and abundance) and habitat variables quantified across many spatial scales (statewide to local) and two time periods in California and southern Oregon, USA. We also addressed (1) if old-growth forest fragmentation was negatively associated with murrelet use, and (2) if some nesting areas are more important than others due to their proximity to high quality marine habitat. Most landscapes used for nesting were restricted to low elevation areas with frequent fog. Birds were most abundant in unfragmented old-growth forests located within a matrix of mature second-growth forest. Murrelets were less likely to occupy old-growth habitat if it was isolated (> 5 km) from other nesting murrelets. We found a time lag in response to fragmentation, where at least a few years were required before birds abandoned fragmented forests. Compared to landscapes with little tono murrelet use, landscapes with many murrelets were closer to the ocean's bays, river mouths, sandy shores, submarine canyons, and marine waters with consistently high primary productivity. Within local landscapes (≤ 800ha), inland factors limited bird abundance, but at the broadest landscape scale studied (3200 ha), proximity to marine habitat was most limiting. Management should focus on protecting or creating large, contiguous old-growth forest stands, especially in low-elevation areas near productive marine habitat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agee J.K. 1993. Fire ecology of Pacific Northwest forests. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atzet T.R. and Wheeler D.L. 1982. Historical and ecological perspectives on fire activity in the Klamath Geological Province of the Rogue River and Siskiyou National Forests. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report R6-Range-102-1982., Corvallis, OR, USA.

  • Burnham K.P. and Anderson D.R. 1998. Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkett E.E. 1995. Marbled murrelet food habits and prey ecology. In: Ralph C.J., Hunt G.L., Raphael M.G. and Piatt J.F. (eds), Ecology and Conservation of the Marbled Murrelet. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-152, Albany, CA, USA, pp. 247-254.

  • CTTF (California Timberland Task Force) 1993. The report of the California Timberland Task Force. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Strategic Planning Program, Sacramento, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J., Franklin J.F. and Spies T.A. 1993. Contrasting microclimates among clearcut, edge, and interior old-growth Douglas-fir forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 63: 219-237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark R.G. and Shutler D. 1999. Avian habitat selection: pattern from process in nest-site use by ducks? Ecology 80: 272-281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cody M.L. 1973. Coexistence, coevolution and convergent evolution in seabird communities. Ecology 54: 31-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congalton R.G., Green K. and Teply J. 1993. Mapping old-growth forests on national forest and park lands in the Pacific Northwest from remotely sensed data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 59: 529-535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N.A.C. 1993. Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly C., Nelson R.P. and Phillips D.L. 1994. A statistical-topographic model for mapping climatological precipitation over mountainous terrain. Journal of Applied Meteorology 33: 140-158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel T.W. 1942. Comparative Transpiration Rates of Several Western Conifers under Controlled Conditions. Ph.D., University of California, Berkeley, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillingham C.P., Miller R.C. and Webb L.O. 1995. Marbled murrelet distribution in the Siskiyou National Forest of southwestern Oregon. Northwestern Naturalist 76: 33-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Divoky G.J. and Horton M. 1995. Breeding and natal dispersal, nest habitat loss and implications for marbled murrelet populations. In: Ralph C.J., Hunt G.L., Raphael M.G. and Piatt J.F. (eds), Ecology and Conservation of the Marbled Murrelet. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-152, Albany, CA, USA, pp. 83-87.

  • Franklin J.G. and Dyrness C.T. 1973. Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-8., Portland, OR, USA.

  • Freilich J.E., Burnham K.P., Collins C.M. and Garry C.A. 2000. Factors affecting population assessments of desert tortoises. Conservation Biology 14: 1479-1489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganter B. and Cooke F. 1998. Colonial nesters in a deteriorating habitat: site fidelity and colony dynamics of lesser snow geese. Auk 115: 642-652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenier J.J. and Nelson S.K. 1995. Relationship of marbled murrelets with habitat characteristics at inland sites in California. In: Ralph C.J., Hunt G.L., Raphael M.G. and Piatt J.F. (eds), Ecology and Conservation of the Marbled Murrelet. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-152, Albany, CA, USA, pp. 191-204.

  • Haig S.M., Mehlman D.W. and Oring L.W. 1998. Avian movements and wetland connectivity in landscape conservation. Conservation Biology 12: 749-758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer T.E. 1995. Inland habitat associations of marbled murrelets in western Washington. In: Ralph C.J., Hunt G.L., Raphael M.G. and Piatt J.F. (eds), Ecology and Conservation of the Marbled Murrelet. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-152, Albany, CA, USA, pp. 163-176.

  • Hamer T.E. and Nelson S.K. 1995. Characteristics of marbled murrelet nest trees and nesting stands. In: Ralph C.J., Hunt G.L., Raphael M.G. and Piatt J.F. (eds), Ecology and Conservation of the Marbled Murrelet. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-152, Albany, CA, USA, pp. 69-82.

  • Hansen A.J., Spies T.A., Swanson F.J. and Ohmann J.L. 1991. Conserving biodiversity in managed forests. BioScience 41: 382-392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer D.W. and Lemeshow S. 1989. Applied Logistic Regression. Wiley, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt G.L. 1995. Oceanographic processes and marine productivity in waters offshore of marbled murrelet breeding habitat. In: Ralph C.J., Hunt G.L., Raphael M.G. and Piatt J.F. (eds), Ecology and Conservation of the Marbled Murrelet. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-152, Albany, CA, USA, pp. 219-222.

  • Jodice P.G.R. and Collopy M.W. 2000. Activity patterns of marbled murrelets in Douglas-Fir old-growth forests of the Oregon Coast Range. Condor 102: 275-285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labisky R.F., Miller K.E. and Hartless C.S. 1999. Effect of Hurricane Andrew on survival and movements of white-tailed deer in the Everglades. Journal of Wildlife Management 63: 872-879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leptich D.J. and Gilbert J.R. 1989. Summer home range and habitat use by moose in northern Maine (USA). Journal of Wildlife Management 53: 880-885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manley I.A. and Nelson S.K. 1999. Habitat characteristics associated with nest success and predation at marbled murrelet nest trees. Pacific Seabirds 26: 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marvin G.A. 2001. Age, growth, and long-term site fidelity in the terrestrial plethodontid salamander, Plethodon kentucki. Copeia: 108-117.

  • Marzluff J.M. and Restani M. 1999. The effects of forest fragmentation on avian nest predation. In: Rochelle J.A., Lehmann L.A. and Wisniewski J. (eds), Forest Fragmentation: Wildlife and Management Implications. Brill Academic Publishing, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp. 155-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K. and Marks B.J. 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351., Portland, OR, USA.

  • Meyer C.B. and Miller S.L. 2002. Marbled murrelet use of fragmented landscapes for nesting in southern Oregon. Conservation Biology (in press).

  • Meyer C.B. 1999. Marbled murrelet use of landscapes and seascapes during the breeding season in California and southern Oregon. Ph.D., University of Wyoming, Laramie, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller G.S., Beissinger S.R., Carter H.R., Csuti B., Hamer T.E. and Perry D.A. 1997. Recovery plan for the threatened marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) in Washington, Oregon, and California. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller S.L. and Ralph C.J. 1995. Relationships of marbled murrelets with habitat and vegetation characteristics at inland sites in California. In: Ralph C.J., Hunt G.L., Raphael M.G. and Piatt J.F. (eds), Ecology and Conservation of the Marbled Murrelet. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-152, Albany, CA, USA, pp. 205-215.

  • Mladenoff D.J., White M.A. and Pastor J. 1993. Comparing spatial pattern in unaltered old-growth and disturbed forest landscapes. Ecological Applications 3: 294-306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson S.K. and Hamer T.H. 1995a. Nesting biology and behavior of the marbled murrelet. In: Ralph C.J., Hunt G.L., Raphael M.G. and Piatt J.F. (eds), Ecology and Conservation of the Marbled Murrelet. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-152, Albany, CA, USA, pp. 57-67.

  • Nelson S.K. and Hamer T.H. 1995b. Nest success and the effects of predation on marbled murrelets. In: Ralph C.J., Hunt G.L., Raphael M.G. and Piatt J.F. (eds), Ecology and Conservation of the Marbled Murrelet. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-152, Albany, CA, USA, pp. 89-97.

  • Neter J., Wasserman W. and Kutner M.H. 1989. Applied Linear Regression Models. Richard D. Irwin, Bunridge, IL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton P.W.C. 1994. The effect of edge on avian nest success: how strong is the evidence? Conservation Biology 8: 17-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearcy W.G. and Schoener A. 1987. Changes in the marine biota coincident with the 1982-83 El Niño in the northeastern subarctic Pacific Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research 92: 14417-14428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam R.H. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. American Naturalist 132: 652-661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralph C.J. and Miller S.L. 1995. Offshore population estimates of marbled murrelets in California. In: Ralph C.J., Hunt G.L., Raphael M.G. and Piatt J.F. (eds), Ecology and Conservation of the Marbled Murrelet. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-152, Albany, CA, USA, pp. 353-360.

  • Ralph C.J., Nelson S.K., Shaughnessy M.M. and Miller S.L. 1993. Methods for surveying for marbled murrelets in forests. Oregon Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA, Technical paper # 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael M.G., Young J.A. and Galleher B.M. 1995. A landscapelevel analysis of marbled murrelet habitat in western Washington. In: Ralph C.J., Hunt G.L., Raphael M.G. and Piatt J.F. (eds), Ecology and Conservation of the Marbled Murrelet. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-152, Albany, CA, USA, pp. 177-189.

  • SAS Institute 1990. SAS/STAT user's guide, release 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenherr J.R. 1991. Blue whales feeding on high concentrations of euphausiids around Monterey Submarine Canyon. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69: 583-594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somers R.H. 1962. A new asymmetric measure of association for ordinal variables. American Sociological Review 27: 799-811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong C.S. 1995. Distribution of marbled murrelets along the Oregon coast in 1992. Northwestern Naturalist 76: 99-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varoujean D.H. and Williams W.A. 1995. Abundance and distribution of marbled murrelets in Oregon and Washington based on aerial surveys. In: Ralph C.J., Hunt G.L., Raphael M.G. and Piatt J.F. (eds), Ecology and Conservation of the Marbled Murrelet. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-152, Albany, CA, USA, pp. 337-338.

  • Van Horne B. 1983. Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. Journal of Wildlife Management 47: 893-901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens J.A., Adicott J.F., Case T.J. and Diamond J. 1986. Overview: the importance of spatial and temporal scale in ecological investigations. In: Diamond J.T. and Case T.J. (eds), Community Ecology. Harper & Row, New York, NY, USA, pp. 145-153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinke P.J. 1977. The redwood forest and associated north coast forests. In: Barbour M.G. and Major J. (eds), Terrestrial Vegetation of California. Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA, pp. 679-698.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyer, C.B., Miller, S.L. & Ralph, C.J. Multi-scale landscape and seascape patterns associated with marbled murrelet nesting areas on the U.S. west coast. Landscape Ecology 17, 95–115 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016574928706

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016574928706

Navigation