Skip to main content
Log in

EPR Adoption and Dual Record Maintenance in the U.S.: Assessing Variation in Medical Systems Infrastructure

  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growing adoption of evidence-based medicine in the United States is acting to cause fundamental changes in the delivery of healthcare management services. With the increasing incorporation of electronic patient records (EPRs) into the day-to-day practice of medicine, it necessitates greater dependence on adequate functioning of such resources, as they become more frequently used as a clinical complement in the practice of medicine. Assessing the patterns of adoption of EPRs is likewise of increasing importance, with the recent imposition of uniform government data collection and management requirements. The medium of data storage and maintenance within many organizations is a critical factor in the ultimate delivery of service, with a like need for an integrated, designated medium for the management of data becoming paramount. This study examines, on a nationwide basis, variation in reported adoption of EPRs within U.S. healthcare organizations, and the related maintenance of dual electronic/paper record systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Mikkelsen, G., and Aasly, J., Concordance of information in parallel electronic and paper based patient records. Int. J. Med. Inf. 63(3):123-131, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jones, R., Pearson, J., McGregor, S., Cawsey, A., Barrett, A., Craig, N., Atkinson, J., Gilmour, W., and McEwen, J., Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for patients. BMJ 319(7219):1241-1247, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.L. 104-19. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, 1996.

  4. Computer-Based Patient Record Institute (CPRI). Description of the Computer-Based Patient Record and Computer-Based Patient Record System, Schaumburg, IL, 1995.

  5. Inmon, W., Building the Data Warehouse, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. May, A., European health policy: Anglo-Swedish lessons. Br. J. Health Care Manag. 6(11):511-514, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Detmer, D., Richard, D., and Steen, E., The Computer-Based Patient Record: An EssentialTechnology for Healthcare, Rev. edn., National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. ASTM. E1384: Content and Structure of the Computer-Based Patient Record, West Conshohocken, PA, 1996.

  9. Lorence, D. P., Benchmarking professional practice issues: A preview. J. AHIMA 69(10):53-56, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Seely-Brown, J., The Social Life of Information, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel P. Lorence.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lorence, D.P., Spink, A. & Richards, M.C. EPR Adoption and Dual Record Maintenance in the U.S.: Assessing Variation in Medical Systems Infrastructure. Journal of Medical Systems 26, 357–367 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016453130844

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016453130844

Navigation