Abstract
The classical approach to medical decision making can be limited by the underlying theories. The evolutionary computation is a different concept, which can find many different solutions of the problem. In medicine, this is useful because of different expectations the decision system must face. We implemented a tool for genetic induction of vector decision trees, which are a good choice for a medical decision model because of their simplicity and transparency. The vector decision tree gives multiple classifications in one single pass. Evolutionary development of such trees achieved good results when the results were statistically compared to those of other classical methods. For medical interpretation however a cooperation with doctors is needed to verify the model build.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Kokol, P., Hleb, Š., Podgorelec, V., and Zorman, M., Some ideas about intelligent medical system design, 12th IEEE Symp. Comput.-Based Med. Syst., IEEE Computer Society, Stamford, CT, pp. 48-52, 1999.
Exclusive ore. Retrieved from http:nnwww.xor.com
Podgorelec, V., and Kokol, P., Self-adapting evolutionary decision support model. Proc. 1999 IEEE Int. Symp. Ind. Electron. ISIE'99, IEEE Press, NY, pp. 1484-1489, 1999.
Kokol, P., et al., Participative design, decision trees, automatic learning and medical decision making, Medical Informatics Europe '96, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, Vol. 34, pp. A501-A505, Amsterdam, 1996.
Quinlan, J. R., Decision trees and instance based classifiers, Artif. Intellig. Robot. 521-535, 1997.
Holland, J., Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, The University of Michigan Press, 1975.
Koza, J. R., Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.
Koza, J., Genetic Programming II: Automatic Discovery of Reusable Programs, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994.
Takagi, H., Introduction to fuzzy systems, neural networks, and genetic algorithms. In Ruan, D. (ed.), Intelligent Hybrid Systems, Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA, pp. 3-34, 1997.
Bäck, T., Evolutionary Algorithms in Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press, London, 1996.
Goldberg, D. E., Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989.
Banzhaf, W., Nordin, P., Keller, R. E., and Francone, F. D., Genetic Programming-An Introduction, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1998.
Kokol, P., Podgorelec, V., and Malčič, I., Diagnostic process optimization with evolutionary programming. Proc. 11th IEEE Symp. Comput.-Based Med. Syst. CBMS'98, Lubbock, TX, pp. 62-67, June 1998.
Ohguri, H., Ogawa, K., Maeda, T., Maeda, A., and Maruyama, I., Cancer-associated retinopathy induced by both anti-recoverin and anti-hsc70 antibodies in vivo. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 40(13):3160-3167, 1999.
Andreassi, L., et al., Digital dermoscopy analysis for the differentiation of atypical nevi and early melanoma: A new quantitative simeology. Arch Dermatol. 135(12):1459-1465, 1999.
Fischer, W., and Lamm, D., Experience with radical surgery for tumor persistence or recurrence after primary irradiation of cervix neoplasms. Zentralbl. Gynakol. 97(20):1255-1259, 1975.
RuleQuest. Retrieved from http:nnwww.rulequest.com
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Šprogar, M., Lenič, M. & Alayon, S. Evolution in Medical Decision Making. Journal of Medical Systems 26, 479–489 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016413418549
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016413418549