Skip to main content
Log in

Parent and Professional Agreement on Cognitive Level of Children with Autism

  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the extent of agreement between parents and professional evaluators regarding the cognitive level of children with autism. We sought to determine the degree of parent and standardized test agreement about the child's cognitive level for children at different levels of cognitive functioning. Information regarding parental view of cognitive levels was collected from the questionnaires used during the initial evaluation. These levels were compared with age equivalencies obtained by professionals from standardized intellectual measures. Significant difference between parental perception and professional assessment of the child's cognitive level was found. In addition, there was significant correlation between the level of agreement and cognitive functioning; agreement increased as the level of cognitive functioning increased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abrams, E. Z., & Goodman, J. F. (1998). Diagnosing developmental problems in children: parents and professionals negotiate bad news. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 23(2) 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achenbach, T. M., McConoughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987). Childhood/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpen, G. D., & Boll, T. J. (1972). Developmental profile manual. Aspen, CO: Psychological Development Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association Ethics Committee. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597–1611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D. B., Jr. (1996). Assessing infants and preschoolers with special needs. New Jersey: Prentice-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayley, N. (1969). Manual for the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. New York: Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glascoe, F. P. (1994). It's not what it seems: the relationship between parents’ concerns and children with global delays. Clinical Pediatrics, 30, 292–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, D. E. (1995). Lay conceptions of autism: parents’ explanatory models. Medical Anthropology, 16(2), 99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenbaum, P. E., Dedrick, R. F., Prange, M. E., & Friedman, R. M. (1994). Parent, teacher, and child ratings of problem behaviors of youngsters with serious emotional disturbances. Psychological Assessment, 6(2), 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, H. H., Miller, A., & Armstrong, R. W. (1994). Parent-professional agreement on diagnosis and recommendations for children with developmental disorders. Children's Health Care, 23(2), 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeMay, D. W., Griffin, P. M., & Sanford, A. R. (1977). Learning accomplishment profile, diagnostic edition manual. Winston-Salem, NC: Kaplan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, G. (1984). The validity of the Receptive-Expressive Language Scale with mentally retarded children. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 9, 86–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosetti, L. M. (1996). Communication intervention, birth to three. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholper, E., & Reichler, R. J. (1972). How well do parents understand their own psychotic child? Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 2(4), 387–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, D., Hall, J., & Thomas, P. J. (1984). Multisource assessment of young handicapped children: a comparison. Exceptional Children, 4, 336–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, R. (1988). Involvement of parents in early childhood assessment. In T. D. Wachs & R. Sheehan (Eds.) Assessment of young, developmentally disabled children. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigafoos, J., & Pennell, D. (1995). Parent and teacher assessment of receptive and expressive language in preschool children with developmental disorders. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 12, 329–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, W. L., & Hogan, K. L. (1993). A structured parent interview for identifying young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23(4), 639–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, W. L., & Rosenbaum, J. L. (1988). A comparison of teacher and parent views of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18(3), 404–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szatmari, P., Archer, L., Fisman, S., & Streiner, D. L. (1994). Parent and teacher agreement in the assessment of pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(6), 703–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, E. P., & Sattler, J. M. (1986). Guide for administering and scoring the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, 4th ed. Chicago, IL: Riverside Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. A. (1983). Physical disability: a psychological approach. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diane M. Geiger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geiger, D.M., Smith, D.T. & Creaghead, N.A. Parent and Professional Agreement on Cognitive Level of Children with Autism. J Autism Dev Disord 32, 307–312 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016382819186

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016382819186

Navigation