Skip to main content

Anything Goes: or, How the Accommodation of Europe's Universities to European Integration Integrates an Inspiring Number of Contradictions

Abstract

This article analyses the implications for the integration of highereducation in Europe as presented by the Bologna process. It examinesthe evidence presented in official documents which claim a wide-spreadconsensus for this initiative. The article analyses the particular ideological commitment built into the Bologna process in the light ofits four objectives Mobility, Employability, Competitiveness andAttractiveness. It questions whether that consensus, largely taken for granted at the higher levels of political discussion, is fullyreflected in `le pays réel' – at the chalk face. It argues that the main test of the Bologna `principles' will come when talk gives wayto implementation, both at the level of first degrees and in the areaof research training.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  • Amaral, A. & Magalhoes, A. (2001). On Markets, Autonomy and Regulation: The Janus Head Revisited, Higher Education Policy 14(1), 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attali Report (1998). Pour un Modèle Européen d'Enseignement Supérieur: Rapport de la Commission Présidé par Jacques Attali, Le Monde (July).

  • Bauer, M., Askling, B., Marton, S. & Marton, F. (2000). Transforming Universities.London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerych, L. & Sabatier, P. (1985). Great Expectations: Implementing Reform in European Higher Education. Stoke on Trent, UK: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.R. (1995). Places of Inquiry. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conseil de l'Europe (2000). Recommandation No R (2000) 8 du Comité des Ministres aux Etats Membres sur la Mission de Recherche de l'Université, Strasbourg, Conseil de l'Europe (download from cm.coe.int/ta/rec/2000/f2000r8.htm).

  • Haug, G. & Tauch, C. (2001). 'Trends in learning structures in Higher Education (ii)' Follow-up report prepared for the Salamanca and Prague Conferences of March/May 2001 (xerox), April 2001 slnd.

  • Meek, V.L., Goedegebuure, L., Kivinen, O. & Rinne, R. (eds) (1996). The Mockers and the Mocked: Comparative Perspectives on Differentiation, Convergence and Diversity in Higher Education. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (2001a). The European Dimension in Higher Education: An Excursion into the Modern Use of Historical Analogues. In J. Huisman, Maassen & G. Neave (eds), Higher Education and the Nation State. Oxford: Elsevier Pergamon, 13–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (2001b). Universidad y Communidad: 'Relaciones peligrosas?' Encrucijadas: Revista de la Universidad de Buenos Aires, No. 12, October, 8–21.

  • Neave, G. (2002). 'On Stakeholders, Cheshire Cats and Seers: Changing Visions of the University', Inaugural Lecture, Enschede, March 2002, Universiteit Twente.

  • Neave, G. & van Vught, F. (1992). Prometheus Bound: Changing Relationship between Government and Higher Education in Western Europe. Oxford: Pergamon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, L. (2001). Higher Education and European Regionalism, Pedagogy, Culture and Society 9(2), 133–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1998). World Statistical Outlook on Higher Education 1980–1995 [Working Document]. Paris: UNESCO, p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • 'Towards the European Higher Education Area' Communiqué of the Meeting of European Ministers in charge of higher education in Prague on May 19th 2001, slnd [xerox].

  • Van der Wende, M. (1999). The 'Bologna Declaration' enhancing transparency and competitiveness of European Higher Education. Paper to 4th Annual Conference of the Global Alliance for Transnational Education, [xerox] October.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neave, G. Anything Goes: or, How the Accommodation of Europe's Universities to European Integration Integrates an Inspiring Number of Contradictions. Tertiary Education and Management 8, 181–197 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016369306930

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016369306930

Keywords

  • Education Research
  • European Integration
  • Research Training
  • Political Discussion
  • Official Document