Skip to main content
Log in

Role of Phytohormones in Sex Differentiation in Plants

  • Published:
Russian Journal of Plant Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of phytohormones in sex expression in plants is briefly surveyed. The interaction of hereditary and environmental factors in sex expression is considered. A major role of gibberellins and cytokinins in the regulation of sex expression in dioecious and monoecious flowering plants and in some muscoids is demonstrated. The evidence for the effect of other phytohormones and physiologically active compounds on sex expression in plants is examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Frenkel, R. and Galun, E., Pollination Mechanisms: Reproduction and Plant Breeding, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grant, S., Houben, A., Vyskot, B., Siroky, J., Pan, W.H., Macas, J., and Saedler, H., Genetics of Sex Determination in Flowering Plants, Dev. Genet., 1994, vol. 15, pp. 214–230.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Matsunaga, S. and Kawano, S., Sex Determination by Sex Chromosomes in Dioecious Plants, Plant Biol., 2001, vol. 3, pp. 481–488.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chailakhyan, M.Kh. and Khryanin, V.N., Pol rastenii i ego gormonal'naya regulyatsiya, Moscow: Nauka, 1982. Translated under the title Sexuality of Plants and Its Hormonal Regulation, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Korpelainen, H., Labile Sex Expression in Plants, Biol. Rev. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 1998, vol. 73, pp. 157–180.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Čulafi, L., Photoperiodic and Hormonal Control of Flowering and Sex Determination of Monoecious and Dioecious Plants Grown in vivo and in vitro, Fiziol. Rast. (Moscow), 1999, vol. 46, pp. 648–660 (Russ. J. Plant Physiol., Engl. Transl.).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chailakhyan, M.Kh., Gormonal'naya teoriya razvitiya rastenii (Hormonal Theory of Plant Development), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bol'shoi entsiklopedicheskii slovar': “Biologiya” (Grand Encyclopedic Dictionary, “Biology”), Gilyarov, M.S., Ed., Moscow: Bol'shaya Rossiiskaya Entsiklopediya, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heslop-Harrison, J., Sex Expression in Flowering Plant, Meristem and Differentiation, Brookhaven Symp. Biol., 1963, vol. 16, pp. 109–125.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sabinin, D.A., Mineral'noe pitanie rastenii (Mineral Nutrition of Plant), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bavrina, T.V., Čulafi, L., and Chailakhyan, M.Kh., The Effect of Long Day and Phytohormones on the Flowering and the Sex Expression of Dioecious Rumex actosella L. Plant, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1991, vol. 317, pp. 1510–1514.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bessler, B., Changes in Habit and Sex Expression in Tuberous Begonia Hybrids by Use of GA(3) and Benzylaminopurine, Gartenbauwissenschaft., 1996, vol. 61, pp. 205–210.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yin, T.J. and Quinn, J.A., Tests of a Mechanistic Model of One Hormone Regulating Both Sexes in Cucumis sativus (Cucurbitaceae), Am. J. Bot., 1995, vol. 82, pp. 1537–1546.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boissay, E., Delaigue, M., Sallaud, C., and Esnault, R., Predominant Expression of a Peroxidase Gene in Staminate Flowers of Mercurialis annua, Physiol. Plant., 1996, vol. 96, pp. 251–257.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Irish, E.E., Regulation of Sex Determination in Maize, BioEssays, 1996, vol. 18, pp. 363–369.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yin, T.J. and Quinn, J.A., Tests of a Mechanistic Model of One Hormone Regulating Both Sexes in Buchloe dactiloides (Poaceae), Am. J. Bot., 1995, vol. 82, pp. 745–751.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dekock, M., Theron, K.I., Swart, P., Weiler, E.W., and Bellstedt, D.U., Cytokinins in the Xylem Sap of the Dioecious Fynbos Shrub Leucadendron rubrum (Burm) F. Seasonal Fluctuations and Their Possible Interaction with Morphological Characteristics as Expressed in the 2 Sexes, New Phytol., 1994, vol. 127, pp. 749–759.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miginiac, E., Some Aspects of Regulation of Flowering: Role of Correlative Factors in Photoperiodic Plants, Bot. Mag. Tokyo, 1978, Spec. Iss., pp. 159–173.

  19. Minina, E.G., Biologicheskii osnovy tsveteniya i plodonosheniya duba (Biological Basics of Flowering and Fruit Formation in Oak Plants), Tr. Inst. Lesa, Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1954, no. 17, pp. 5–97.

  20. Tompsett, P.B., Studies of Growth and Flowering in Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.: 2. Initiation and Development of Male, Female and Vegetative Buds, Ann. Bot., 1978, vol. 42, pp. 889–900.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sidorskii, A.G., Reorientation of Sexual Differentiation as Affected by Physiologically Active Substances, Usp. Sovrem. Biol., 1978, vol. 85, pp. 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zaplatin, B.P. and Khryanin, V.N., A Dependence of Maize Plant Development on the Cytokinin and Gibberellin Introduction in Different Zones of the Stem, Tez. 2-go s ”ezda VOFR (Proc. 2nd Meet. Vses Soc. Plant Physiol.), Pushchino: Nauchn. Tsentr Akad. Nauk, 1992, p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Muromtsev, G.S. and Khryanin, V.N., Some Antigibberellin Effects of Chlorocholine Chloride, S.-kh. Biol., 1974, vol. 9, pp. 57–60.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Khryanin, V.N., Chlorocholine Chloride and Gibberellin Effect on the Changes in Plant Sexuality, Dokl. Vses. Akad. S-kh. Nauk im. V.I. Lenina, 1978, no. 3, pp. 18–21.

  25. Banks, J.A., Gametophyte Development in Ferns, Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 1999, vol. 50, p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pankratov, S.Yu. and Khryanin, V.N., The Role of Cytokinin and Gibberellin in the Processes of Growth, Development, and Sex Expression of Polytrichum commune Plant, Tez. IV s”ezda VOFR (Proc. 4th Meet. Russ. Soc. Plant Physiol., Ch. 2), Pushchino: Nauchn. Tsentr Ross. Akad. Nauk, 1999, pp. 660–661.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Heslop-Harrison, J., Auxin and Sexuality in Cannabis sativa, Physiol. Plant., 1956, vol. 9, pp. 588–597.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Takasi, S. and Hideo, I., Factors Responsible for the Sex Expression of the Cucumber Plant: 14. Auxin and Gibberellin Content in the Stem Apex and the Sex Pattern of Flowers, Tohoku J. Agr. Res., 1964, vol. 14, pp. 227–239.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Čulafič, L. and Neskovič, M., Indole Auxins in Spinach Plants Grown in Long and Short Days, Biol. Plant., 1974, vol. 16, pp. 359–365.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Goroshkevich, S.N. and Menyailo, L.N., Phytohormonal Gradients as a Factor Controlling the Differentiation of Cedar Pine Crowns into Generative Stories, Fiziol. Rast. (Moscow), 1996, vol. 43, pp. 208–212 (Russ. J. Plant Physiol., Engl. Transl.).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Folke, S.H. and Delph, L.F., Environmental and Physiological Effects on Pistillate Flower Production in Silene noctiflora L., Int. J. Plant Sci., 1997, vol. 158, pp. 501–509.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kahana, A., Siberstein, L., Kessler, N., Goldstein, R.S., and Perltreves, R., Expression of ACC Oxidase Genes Differs among Sex Genotypes and Sex Phases in Cucumber, Plant Mol. Biol., 1999, vol. 41, pp. 517–528.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Krupnick, G.A., Brown, K.W., and Stephenson, A.G., The Influence of Fruit on the Regulation of Internal Ethylene Concentrations and Sex Expression in Cucurbita texana, Int. J. Plant Sci., 1999, vol. 160, pp. 321–330.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Krupnick, G.A., Avila, G., Brown, K.M., and Stephenson, A.G., Effects of Herbivory on Internal Ethylene Production and Sex Expression in Cucurbita texana, Funct. Ecol., 2000, vol. 14, pp. 215–225.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Avilasakar, G., Krupnick, G.A., and Stephenson, A.G., Growth and Resource-Allocation in Cucurbita pepo ssp. texana. Effects of Fruit Removal, Int. J. Plant Sci., 2001, vol. 162, pp. 1089–1095.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Fuchs, Y. and Lieberman, M., Effects of Kinetin, IAA and Gibberellic Acid on Ethylene Production and Interactions in Growth of Seedlings, Plant. Physiol., 1968, vol. 43, pp. 2029–2036.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Torrey, J.G., Zobel, J.G., and Zobel, R., Root Growth and Morphogenesis, The Physiology of Garden Pea, Sutclife, J.F. and Pate, J.S., Eds., New York: Academic, 1977, vol. 12, pp. 119–152.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Abdel-Gaward, H.A. and Ketellapper, H.J., Regulation of Growth, Flowering and Senescence of Spinach Plants: 2. Effects of 2-Chlorethylphosphonic Acid (Ethrel) and Abscisic Acid, Plant Physiol., 1969, vol. 44, pp. 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rudich, J. and Halevy, A.H., Involvement of Abscisic Acid in the Regulation of Sex Expression in the Cucumber, Plant Cell Physiol., 1974, vol. 15, pp. 635–637.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Banks, J.A., Hickok, L., and Webb, M.A., The Programming of Sexual Phenotype in the Homosporous Fern Ceratopteris richadii, Int. J. Plant. Sci., 1993, vol. 154, pp. 522–534.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mohan Ram, H.Y. and Jaiswal, V.S., Induction of Male Flowers of Female Plants of Cannabis sativa by Gibberellin and Its Inhibition by Abscisic Acid, Planta, 1972, vol. 105, pp. 263–266.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Britikov, E.A., Biologicheskaya rol' prolina ((Biological Role of Proline), Moscow: Nauka, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Martin, C., Quelques aspects biochimique de floraison, Selec. Franc., 1977, vol. 23, pp. 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rajagopal, V. and Anderson, A.S., Does Abscisic Acid Influence Proline Accumulation in Stressed Leaves, Planta, 1978, vol. 143, pp. 85–88.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hedden, P. and Phillips, A.L., Gibberellin Metabolism: New Insights Revealed by the Genes, Trends Plant Sci., 2000, vol. 5, pp. 523–530.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Westergaard, M., The Mechanism of Sex Determination in Dioecious Flowering Plants, Adv. Genet., 1958, vol. 9, pp. 217–281.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Negrutiu, I., Vyskot, B., Barbacar, N., Georgiev, S., and Moneger, F., Dioecious Plants: A Key to the Early Events of Sex Chromosome Evolution, Plant Physiol., 2001, vol. 127, pp. 1418–1424.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mittwoch, U., Genetics of Sex Differentiation, New York: Academic, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Grishko, N.N., Problems of Sexuality in Hemp Plants, Tr. Vses. Nauchn. Issled. Inst. Konopli (Kiev), 1935, vol. 8, pp. 197–241.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Khryanin, V.N. and Chailakhyan, M.Kh., Long-Day Dependent Sexuality of Hemp and Spinach, Dokl. Akad. Nauk ArmSSR, 1977, vol. 55, pp. 186–191.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Khryanin, V.N. and Milyaeva, E.L., Gibberellin Effect on the Differentiation of Hemp Stem Apices, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1977, vol. 234, pp. 982–984.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Love, A. and Love, D., Experimental Sex Reversal in Plants, Svensk Bot. Tidskr., 1940, vol. 34, pp. 248–254.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Pokrovskii, B.P., Sex Hormones, Biokhimiya gormonov i gormonal'noi regulyatsii (Biochemistry of Hormones and Hormonal Regulation), Yudaev, N.A., Ed., Moscow: Nauka, 1976, pp. 246–299.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Kopcewicz, J. and Chrominski, A., Estrogens in 2-Chloroethylphosphonic Acid Induced Femaleness of Cucurbita pepo L, Experientia, 1972, vol. 28, pp. 603–604.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Maier, C.G.A., Chapman, K.D., and Smith, D.W., Phytoestrogens and Floral Development in Dioecious Maclura pomifera (Raf.) Schneid. and Morus rubra L. (Moraceae), Plant Sci., 1997, vol. 130, pp. 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Paseshnichenko, V.A. and Guseva, A.R., Biosynthesis and Physiological Role of Phytohormones, Usp. Biol. Khim., 1974, vol. 14, pp. 254–277.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Heftmann, E., Steroid Biochemistry, New York: Academic, 1970. Translated under the title Biokhimiya steroidov, Moscow: Mir, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Khryanin, V.N. and Chailakhyan, M.Kh., The Effect of Growth Regulators on the Development of Hemp Embryo in the in vitro Culture, Fiziol. Biokhim. Kul't. Rast., 1988, vol. 20, pp. 341–344.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Chailakhyan, M.Kh., Regulyatsiya tsveteniya vysshikh rastenii (Control of the Higher Plant Flowering), Moscow: Nauka, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zaplatin, B.P. and Khryanin, V.N., The Model of Integral Influence of Phytohormones on the Sex Expression in Cucumber Plants, Regulyatory rosta i razvitiya rastenii v biotekhnologiyakh (Growth Regulators and Plant Development in Biotechnology), Moscow: Mosk. S-kh Akad., 2001, pp. 29–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khryanin, V.N. Role of Phytohormones in Sex Differentiation in Plants. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 49, 545–551 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016328513153

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016328513153

Navigation