Ecotoxicology

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 213–231 | Cite as

Nineteenth Century Mercury: Hazard to Wading Birds and Cormorants of the Carson River, Nevada

  • Charles J. Henny
  • Elwood F. Hill
  • David J. Hoffman
  • Marilyn G. Spalding
  • Robert A. Grove

Abstract

Contemporary mercury interest relates to atmospheric deposition, contaminated fish stocks and exposed fish-eating wildlife. The focus is on methylmercury (MeHg) even though most contamination is of inorganic (IoHg) origin. However, IoHg is readily methylated in aquatic systems to become more hazardous to vertebrates. In response to a classic episode of historical (1859–1890) IoHg contamination, we studied fish-eating birds nesting along the lower Carson River, Nevada. Adult double-crested cormorants (Phalacrocorax auritus), snowy egrets (Egretta thula) and black-crowned night-herons (Nycticorax nycticorax) contained very high concentrations of total mercury (THg) in their livers (geo. means 134.8μg/g wet weight (ww), 43.7 and 13.5, respectively) and kidneys (69.4, 11.1 and 6.1, respectively). Apparently tolerance of these concentrations was possible due to a threshold-dependent demethylation coupled with sequestration of resultant IoHg. Demethylation and sequestration processes also appeared to have reduced the amount of MeHg redistributed to eggs. However, the relatively short time spent by adults in the contaminated area before egg laying was also a factor in lower than expected concentrations of mercury in eggs. Most eggs (100% MeHg) had concentrations below 0.80μg/g ww, the putative threshold concentration where reproductive problems may be expected; there was no conclusive evidence of mercury-related depressed hatchability. After hatching, the young birds were fed diets by their parents averaging 0.36–1.18μgMeHg/g ww through fledging. During this four to six week period, accumulated mercury concentrations in the organs of the fledglings were much lower than found in adults, but evidence was detected of toxicity to their immune (spleen, thymus, bursa), detoxicating (liver, kidneys) and nervous systems. Several indications of oxidative stress were also noted in the fledglings and were most apparent in young cormorants containing highest concentrations of mercury. This stress was evidenced by increased thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances, low activities of enzymes related to glutathione metabolism and low levels of reduced thiols, plus an increase in the ratio of oxidized to reduced glutathione. At lower concentrations of mercury, as was found in young egrets, we observed elevated activities of protective hepatic enzymes, which could help reduce oxidative stress. Immune deficiencies and neurological impairment of fledglings may affect survivability when confronted with the stresses of learning to forage and the ability to complete their first migration.

mercury snowy egret black-crowned night-heron double-crested cormorant mining splenomegaly histopathology oxidative stress 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ballatori, N. (1994). Glutathione mercaptides as transport forms of metals. Adv. Pharmacol. 27, 271–98.Google Scholar
  2. Blus, L.J. (1984). DDE in birds' eggs: Comparison of two methods for estimating critical levels. Wilson Bull. 96, 268–76.Google Scholar
  3. Brumbaugh, W.G., Krabbenhoft, D.P., Helsel, D.R., Wiener, J.G. and Echols, K.R. (2001). A national pilot study of mercury contamination of aquatic ecosystems along multiple gradients: bioaccumulation in fish. Biological Science Report, USGS/BRD/BSR-2001–0009, 25pp.Google Scholar
  4. Clarkson, T. W. (1971). Epidemiological and experimental aspects of lead and mercury contamination of food. Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 9, 229–43.Google Scholar
  5. Clarkson, T. W. (1972). Recent advances in the toxicology of mercury with emphasis on alkylmercurials. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 1, 203–34.Google Scholar
  6. Clarkson, T.W. (1994). The toxicology of mercury and its compounds. C.J. Watras and J.W. Huckabee (eds) Mercury Pollution—Integration and Synthesis, pp. 631–41. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publ.Google Scholar
  7. Cooper, J.J., Thomas, R.O. and Reed, S.M. (1985). Total mercury in sediment, water and fishes in Carson River drainage, west-central Nevada. Nevada Dept. Environ. Protection, Carson City. 96pp.Google Scholar
  8. Cooper, J. J., Vigg, S., Bryce, R. W. and Jacobson, R. L. (1983). Limnology of Lahontan Reservoir, Nevada 1980–1981. Bioresources and Water Resources Centers, Desert Research Institute, Univ. Nevada, Reno Publ. No. 50021.Google Scholar
  9. Cuvin-Aralar, M. L. A. and Furness, R. W. (1991). Mercury and selenium interaction: A review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 21, 348–64.Google Scholar
  10. Frederick, P. C., Spalding, M. G., Sepulveda, M. S., Williams, G., Bouton, S., Lynch, H., Arrecis, J., Loerzel, S. and Hoffman, D. (1997). Effects of environmental mercury exposure on reproduction, health and survival of wading birds in the Florida Everglades. Final Report, Florida Dept. Environmental Protection.Google Scholar
  11. Gardner, W.S., Kendall, D.R., Odum, R.R., Windom, H.L. and Stephens, J.A. (1978). The distribution of methyl mercury in a contaminated salt marsh ecosystem. Environ. Pollut. 15, 243–51.Google Scholar
  12. Glick, B. (1986). Immunophysiology, In P.D. Sturkie (ed.) Avian Physiology, 4th edn, pp. 87–101. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Heinz, G.H. (1979). Methylmercury: reproductive and behavioral effects on three generations of mallard ducks. J. Wildl. Manage. 43, 394–401.Google Scholar
  14. Henny, C.J. and Herron, G.B. (1989). DDE, selenium, mercury, and white-faced ibis reproduction at Carson Lake, Nevada. J. Wildl. Manage. 53, 1032–45.Google Scholar
  15. Henny, C.J., Blus, L.J., Krynitsky, A.J. and Bunck, C.M. (1984). Current impact of DDE on black-crowned night-herons in the intermountain west. J. Wildl. Manage. 48, 1–13.Google Scholar
  16. Hill, E.F. (1981). Inorganic and organic mercury chloride toxicity to coturmix: sensitivity related to age and quantal assessment of physiological responses. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Maryland, College Park, 221pp.Google Scholar
  17. Hill, E.F. and Soares, J.H., Jr. (1984). Subchronic mercury exposure in coturnix and a method of hazard evaluation. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 3, 489–502.Google Scholar
  18. Hoffman, D.J. and Heinz, G.H. (1998). Effects of mercury (Hg) and selenium (Se) on glutathione metabolism and oxidative stress in mallard ducks. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17, 161–6.Google Scholar
  19. Hoffman, D.J., Spalding, M. and Frederick, P. (1997). Subchronic effects of methylmercury in great egret nestlings. Abstracts of the 18th Annual Meeting, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 16–20 November, p. 153. San Francisco, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  20. Hoffman, D.J., Pendleton, G.W., Ohlendorf, H.M. and Marn, C.M. (1998). Association of mercury and selenium with altered glutathione metabolism and oxidative stress in diving ducks from the San Francisco Bay region. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17, 167–72.Google Scholar
  21. Hoffman, R.J. (1994). Detailed study of irrigation drainage in and near wildlife management areas, west-central Nevada, 1987–90 Part C. Summary of irrigation-drainage effects on water quality, bottom sediment, and biota. USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 92–4024 C, 32pp.Google Scholar
  22. Hoffman, R.J., Hallock, R.J., Rowe, T.G., Lico, M.S., Burge, H.L. and Thompson, S.P. (1990). Reconnaissance investigation of water quality, bottom sediment, and biota associated with the irrigation drainage in and near the Stillwater Wildlife Area, Churchill County, Nevada, 1986–87. USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 89–4015.Google Scholar
  23. Kari, T. and Kauranen, P. (1978). Mercury and selenium contents of seals from fresh and brackish waters in Finland. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 19, 273–80.Google Scholar
  24. Kim, E.Y., Murakima, T., Saeki, K. and Tatsukawa, R. (1996). Mercury levels and its chemical form in tissues and organs of seabirds. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 30, 259–66.Google Scholar
  25. Klaassen, C.D., Bracken, W.M., Dudley, R.E., Goering, P.L., Hazelton, G.A. and Hjelle, J.D. (1985). Role of sulfhydryls in the hepatotoxicity of organic and metallic compounds. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 5, 806–15.Google Scholar
  26. Koeman, J.H., Peeters, W.H.M., Koudstall-Hol, C.H.M., Tjioe, P.S. and Degoeu, J.J.M. (1973). Marine selenium correlations in Marine mammals. Nature 245, 385–6.Google Scholar
  27. Kutsuna, M. (ed.) (1968). Minamata Disease. Study Group of Menamata Disease. Japan: Kumamoto University.Google Scholar
  28. Liang, L., Danilchik, P. and Huang, Z. (1994). Elimination of the dependence on experimental conditions in the determination of selenium in water, sediment, coal, and biological samples by hydride generation. Atomic Spectroscopy, July/August, pp. 151–5.Google Scholar
  29. Lodenius, M. (1994). Mercury in terrestrial ecosystems: A review, In C.J. Watras and J.W. Huckabee (eds). Mercury Pollution, Intergration and Synthesis, pp. 343–54. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Lewis Publ.Google Scholar
  30. Lucotte, M., Mucci, A., Hillaire-Marcel, C., Pichet, P. and Grondin, A. (1995). Anthropogenic mercury enrichment in remote lakes of northern Quebec (Canada). Water Air Soil Pollut. 80, 467–76.Google Scholar
  31. Newton, I. and Haas, M.B. (1988). Pollutants in merlin eggs and their effects on breeding. British Birds 81, 258–69.Google Scholar
  32. Norheim, G. and Froslie, A. (1978). The degree of methylation and organ distribution of mercury in some birds of prey in Norway. ACTA Pharmacologica et Toxicologica 54, 196–204.Google Scholar
  33. Nriagu, J.O., Pfeiffer, W.C., Malm, O., de Souza, C.M.M. and Mierle, G. (1992). Mercury pollution in Brazil. Nature 356, 389.Google Scholar
  34. Pelletier, E. (1985). Mercury-selenium interaction in aquatic organisms: A review. Marine Environ. Res. 18, 111–32.Google Scholar
  35. Pokras, M.A., Hanley, C. and Gordon, Z. (1998). Liver, mercury and methylmercury concentrations in New England common loons (Gavia immer). Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17, 202–4.Google Scholar
  36. Richins, R.T. and Risser, A.C. (1975). Total mercury in water, sediment, and selected aquatic organisms, Carson River, Nevada. Pesticides Monitoring J. 9, 44–54.Google Scholar
  37. Rice, D. and Barone, S., Jr (2000). Critical periods of vulnerability for the developing evidence from humans and animal models. Environ. Health Perspect. 108(Suppl. 3), 511–33.Google Scholar
  38. SAS Institute. (1996). SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 6.12. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
  39. Scheuhammer, A.M., Atchison, C.M., Wong, A.H.K. and Evers, D.C. (1998). Mercury exposure in breeding common loons (Gavia immer) in central Ontario, Canada. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17, 191–6.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, G.H. (1943). The history of the Comstock Lode, 1850–1920. Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, Bull. 37.Google Scholar
  41. Spalding, M.G., Bjork, R.D., Powell, G.V.N. and Sundlof, S.F. (1994). Mercury and cause of death in great white herons. J. Wildl. Manage. 58, 735–9.Google Scholar
  42. Spalding, M.G., Frederick, P.C., McGill, H.C., Bouton, S.N., Richey, L.J., Schumacher, I.M., Blackmore, C.G.M. and Harrison, J. (2000a). Histologic, neurologic, and immunologic effects of methylmercury in captive great egrets. J. Wildl. Dis. 36, 423–35.Google Scholar
  43. Spalding, M.G., Frederick, P.C., McGill, H.C., Bouton, S.N. and McDowell, L.R. (2000b). Methylmercury accumulation in tissues and effects on growth and appetite in captive great egrets. J. Wildl. Dis. 36, 411–22.Google Scholar
  44. Suda, I. and Takahashi, H. (1986). Enhanced and inhibited biotransformation of methylmercury in the rat spleen. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 82, 45–52.Google Scholar
  45. Swain, E.B., Engstrom, D.R., Brigham, M.E., Henning, T.A. and Brezonik, P.L. (1992). Increasing rates of atmospheric mercury deposition in midcontinental North America. Science 257, 784–7.Google Scholar
  46. Thompson, D.R. (1996). Mercury in birds and terrestrial mammals, In W.N. Beyer, G.H. Heinz and A.W. Redmon-Norwood (eds). Environmental Contaminants in Wildlife—Interpreting Tissue Concentrations, pp. 341–56. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publ.Google Scholar
  47. Thompson, D.R. and Furness, D.W. (1989). The chemical form of mercury stored in South Atlantic seabirds. Environ. Pollut. 60, 305–17.Google Scholar
  48. Thompson, D.R., Hamar, K.C. and Furness, R.W. (1991). Mercury accumulation in great skuas Catharacta skua of known age and sex, and its effects upon breeding and survival. J. Appl. Ecol. 28, 672–84.Google Scholar
  49. Tidball, R.R., Briggs, P.H., Stewart, K.C., Vaughn, R.B. and Welsch, E.P. (1991). Analytical data for soil and well core samples from Carson River basin, Lyon and Churchill Counties, Nevada. USGS Open-File Report 91–584, 140pp.Google Scholar
  50. Tuttle, P.L., Higgins, D.K. and Quashnick, J. (2001). Mercury characterization in Lahontan Valley wetlands, Carson River Mercury Site, Lyon and Churchill Counties, Nevada, 1999. Report 1N45, U.S. Fish and Wildl. Service, Reno NV. 32pp.Google Scholar
  51. Van Denburgh, A.S. (1973). Mercury in Carson and Truckee River Basins in Nevada. USGS Open-File Report 73–35.Google Scholar
  52. Wayne, D.M., Warwick, J.J., Lechler, P.J., Gill, G.A. and Lyons, W.B. (1996). Mercury contamination in the Carson River, Nevada; a preliminary study of the impact of mining wastes. Water Air Soil Pollut. 92, 391–408.Google Scholar
  53. Weseloh, D.V., Ewins, P.J., Struger, J., Mineau, P., Bishop, C.A., Postupalsky, S. and Ludwig, J.P. (1995). Double-crested cormorants of the Great Lakes: Changes in population size, breeding distribution and reproductive output between 1913 and 1991. Colonial Waterbirds 18(Special Publ.), 48–59.Google Scholar
  54. Zillioux, E.J., Porcella, D.B. and Benoit, J.M. (1993). Mercury cycling and effects in freshwater wetland ecosystems. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 12, 2245–64.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles J. Henny
    • 1
  • Elwood F. Hill
    • 2
  • David J. Hoffman
    • 3
  • Marilyn G. Spalding
    • 4
  • Robert A. Grove
    • 1
  1. 1.USGS-Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science CenterCorvallisUSA;
  2. 2.GardnervilleUSA
  3. 3.USGS-Patuxent Wildlife Research CenterLaurelUSA
  4. 4.College of Veterinary MedicineDepartment of Pathobiology, University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations