Skip to main content
Log in

Applicability of the co-inoculation technique using Agrobacterium tumefaciens shooty-tumour strain 82.139 in silver birch

  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the co-inoculation technique, genetic transformation is performed using a mixture of Agrobacterium strains – shoot regeneration is induced by the wild-type strain 82.139, while the transferable genes are provided in a binary plasmid by another, non-oncogenic Agrobacterium strain. The aim of the present work was to study the applicability of co-inoculation under both in vitro and greenhouse conditions for in planta transformation in silver birch (Betula pendula Roth). In addition to the original method, several modifications of the technique including an genetically engineered 82.139 strain harbouring the binary pGUSINT were tested. The co-inoculations resulted in a gall formation frequency of 52–94% with greenhouse seedlings, and 4–63% with tissue-cultured plantlets, the shoot induction percentage varying by 0–13 in the greenhouse and 42–75 in vitro. PCR analysis verified that the majority of the regenerated material was non-transgenic, with a few individuals showing integration of the oncogenic T-DNA. According to the histochemical tests, however, some of the numerous differentiating buds and small shoots on gall tissues were transgenic, and contained the GUS reporter gene. The results show that it would have been necessary to apply selection pressure during differentiation in order to recover shoots transformed with the desired genes from the binary plasmid. The morphology and growth of all the regenerated plantlets was normal, suggesting that the oncogenic T-DNA was not expressed even though it was present. In conclusion, it was possible to obtain transgenic silver birch plantlets using the A. tumefaciens strain 82.139, but the co-inoculation method is not directly applicable as in planta transformation protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrios CN (1988) Plant Pathology. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronen T & Häggman H (1995) Differences in Agrobacterium infections in silver birch and Scots pine. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 25: 197–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Azmi A, Dewitte W, Drevet C, van Onckelen H, Landré P, Boudet AM, Jouanin L & Chriqui D (1997) Bud regeneration from Eucalyptus globulus clones and seedlings through hormonal imbalances induced by Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain 82.139. Plant Sci. 127: 81–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasileiro ACM, Leple J-C, Ounnoughi D, Michel M-F & Jouanin L (1991) An alternative approach for gene transfer in trees using wild-type Agrobacterium strains. Plant Mol. Biol. 17: 441–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasileiro ACM, Tourneur C, Leple J-C, Combes V & Jouanin L (1992) Expression of the mutant Arabidopsis thaliana acetolactate synthase gene confers chlorsulfuron resistance to transgenic poplar plants. Transgenic Res. 1: 133–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Charest PJ, Devantier Y & Lachance D (1996) Stable genetic transformation of Picea mariana (black spruce) via particle bombardment. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 32: 91–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Chee PP, Fober AK & Slightom LJ (1989) Transformation of soybean (Glycine max L.) by infecting germinating seeds with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Physiol. 91: 1212–1218

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ & Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. BRL Focus 12: 13–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Drevet C, Brasileiro ACM & Jouanin L (1994) Oncogene arrangement in a shooty strain of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Mol. Biol. 25: 83–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Deblaere R, Bytebier B, De Greve H, Deboeck F, Schell J, Van Montagu M & Leemans O (1985) Efficient octopine ti plasmid-derived vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer to plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 13: 3777–3788

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman KA & Marks MD (1987) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of germinating seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana:a non-tissue culture approach. Mol. Gen. Genet 208: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenning TM, Tymens SS, Gartland JS, Brasier CM & Gartland KMA (1996) Transformation and regeneration of English elm using wild-type Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Sci. 116: 37–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant NJ, Fenning TM & Hammatt N (1998) Regeneration and transformation of wild cherry (Prunus avium L.) and bird cherry (Prunus padus L.). In: Davey MR, Alderson PG, Lowe KC & Power JB (eds) Tree Biotechnology: Towards the Millenium (pp 249–258). Nottingham University Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Häggman HM, Aronen TS & Nikkanen TO (1997) Gene transfer by particle bombardment to Norway spruce and Scots pine pollen. Can. J. For. Res. 27: 928–935

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson RA (1987) Assaying chimeric genes in plants: the GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 5: 387–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Keinonen-Mettälä K, Pappinen A & von Weissenberg K (1998) Comparisons of the effiency of some promoters in silver birch (Betula pendula). Plant Cell Rep. 17: 356–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemmetyinen J, Keinonen-Mettälä K, Lännenpää M, von Weissenberg K & Sopanen T (1998) Activity of the CaMV35S promoter in various parts of transgenic early flowering birch clones. Plant Cell Rep. 18: 243–248

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay J, Séquin A & Lalonde M (1988) Genetic transformation of 9 in vitro clones of Alnus and Betula by Agrobacterium tumefaciencis. Plant Cell Rep. 7: 229–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel M-F, Brasileiro ACM, Depierreux C, Otten L, Delmotte F & Jouanin L (1990) Identification of different Agrobacterium strains isolated from the same forest nursery. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56: 3537–3545

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JH (1972) Experiments in Molecular Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohri T, Mukai Y & K Shinohara (1997) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Japanese white birch (Betula platyphylla var. japonica). Plant Sci. 127: 53–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Regier DA, Akiyoshi DE & Gordon MP (1989) Nucleotide sequence of the tzs gene from Agrobacterium rhizogenes strain A4. Nucleic Acids Res. 17: 8885

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezmer C, Schlichting R, Wächter R & Ullrich CI (1999) Identification and localization of transformed cells in Agrobacterium tumefaciens-induced plant tumors. Planta 209: 399–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson D, Weissinger AK, Ackley R, Glover S & Sederoff RR (1992) Genetic transformation of Norway Spruce (Picea abies (L) Karst) using somatic embryo explants by microprojectile bombardment. Plant Mol. Biol. 19: 925–935

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohini VK & Sankara Rao K (2000) Transformation of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.): a non-tissue culture based approach for generating transgenic plants. Plant Sci. 150: 41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Stomp, AM (1992) Histochemical localization of β-glucuronidase. In: Gallagher SR (ed) GUS Protocols. Using the GUS gene as a Reporter of Gene Expression (pp 103–114). Academic Press, San Diego, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepfer M & Casse-Delbart F (1987) Agrobacterium rhizogenes as a vector for transforming higher plants. Microbiol. Sci. 4: 24–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Tervonen A (1981) Experiments in vegetative propagation by cuttings of broadleaf trees at Haapastensyrjä. The Foundation for Forest Tree Breeding in Finland, Information 3/1981. ISSN 0357–7171

  • Valjakka M, Aronen T, Kangasjärvi J, Vapaavuori E & Häggman H (2000) Genetic transformation of silver birch (Betula pendula) by particle bombardment. Tree Physiol. 20: 607–613

    Google Scholar 

  • Vancanneyt G, Schmidt R, O'Connor-Sanchez A, Willmitzer L & Rocha-Sosa M (1990) Construction of an intron-containing marker gene: Splicing of the intron in transgenic plants and its use in monitoring early events in Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Mol. Gen. Genet. 220: 245–250

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hely M. Häggman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aronen, T.S., Häggman, J.H. & Häggman, H.M. Applicability of the co-inoculation technique using Agrobacterium tumefaciens shooty-tumour strain 82.139 in silver birch. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 70, 147–154 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016317904229

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016317904229

Navigation