Skip to main content

A Dualistic Model of Harmony and its Implications for Conflict Management in Asia

Asia Pacific Journal of Management volume 19, pages 201–220 (2002)Cite this article

Abstract

Conflict avoidance is common in East Asia, and the Confucian notion of harmony is often invoked to explain this tendency. We review the classical Confucian doctrines and found no encouragement of conflict avoidance in Confucian teachings. Quite the contrary, the Confucian notion of harmony embodies disagreement and open debates. Thus, we argue that harmony as conflict avoidance is not a main feature of classical Confucianism, but a characteristic of the secular version that is associated with cultural collectivism. We then review several theories that are based on the notion of harmony, and show that they are compatible with a dualistic model of harmony, which posits an instrumental as well as a value motive in harmony-seeking behavior. In the instrumental perspective, harmony is viewed as a means to a typically materialistic end, whereas in the value perspective, harmony is deemed an end in its own right. Conflict avoidance is primarily driven by the instrumental motive. These two motives are then crossed to form four types of harmony-seeking behaviors. This typology is discussed in terms of its implications for future research and its applications in conflict management.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Asch, S. (1956). “Studies of Independence and Conformity: A Minority of One Against Unanimous Majority. ” Psychological Monographs 70, 1-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balatbat-Echauz, L. (1998). “Conflict Management in the Philippines. ” In K. Leung and D. Tjosvold (eds.), Conflict Management in the Asia Pacific: Assumptions and Approaches in Diverse Cultures. John Wiley & Sons: Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton S. and B. Setiadi. (1998). “Mediation and Conflict Management in Indonesia. ” In K. Leung and D. Tjosvold (eds.), Conflict Management in the Asia Pacific: Assumptions and Approaches in Diverse Cultures. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons Pvt. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R.R. and J.S. Mouton. (1964). The Managerial Grid. Houston, TX: Gulf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R.R. and J.S. Mouton. (1970). “The Fifth Achievement. ” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 6, 413-426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boisot, M. and J. Child. (1988). “The Iron Law of Fiefs: Bureaucratic Failure and the Problem of Governance in the Chinese Economic Reforms. ” Administrative Science Quarterly 33, 507-527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brake T., D.M. Walker, and T. Walker. (1995). Doing Business Internationally: The Guide to Cross-Cultural Success. New York: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, J.M. (2001). “Negotiating Globally. ” San Francesco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, J.A. and A.C. Koh. (1988). “Negotiations in the People's Republic of China: An Empirical Study of American and Chinese Negotiators' Perceptions and Practices. ” Journal of Global Marketing 2(1).

  • Carnevale, P.J. and K. Leung. (2001). “Cultural Dimensions of Negotiation. ” In M.A. Hogg and R.S. Tindale (eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes, Massachusetts: Blackwell, pp. 482-496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G.M. (2001). “Towards Transcultural Understanding: A Harmony Theory of Chinese Communication. ” In V.H. Milhouse, M.K. Asante, and P.O. Nwosu (eds.), Transculture: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Cross-Cultural Relations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 55-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G.M. (2002). “The Impact of Harmony on Chinese Conflict Management. ” In G.M. Chen and R. Ma (eds.), Chinese Conflict Management and Resolution, Westport, CONN: Ablex, pp. 3-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G.M. and J. Chung. (1994). “The Impact of Confucianism on Organizational Communication. ” Communication Quarterly 42, 93-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G.M. andW.J. Starosta. (1996). “Intercultural Communication Competence: A Synthesis. ” Communication Yearbook 19, 353-383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. and W. Pan. (1993). Understanding the Process of Doing Business in China, Taiwan and Hong Kong. Lewistown, NY: The Edward Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, F.M., S.F. Cheung, K. Leung, C. Ward, and F. Leong. (2002). The English Version of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Cho, Y.H. and H.H. Park. (1998). “Conflict Management in Korea: The Wisdom of Dynamic Collectivism. ” In K. Leung and D. Tjosvold (eds.), Conflict Management in the Asia Pacific: Assumptions and Approaches in Diverse Cultures. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confucius. (1983). The Analects (Lun Yu), Translated by D.C. Lau, Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Early, P.C. (1997). Face, Harmony, and Social Structure: An Analysis of Organizational Behavior Across Cultures. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. (1988).AModern Chinese-English Dictionary. Editorial Division (eds.). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackley, C.A. and Q. Dong. (2001). “American Public Relations Networking Encounters China's Guanxi. ” Public Relations Quarterly 46(2), 16-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. (1969). Conflict Management Survey. Rochester, NY: Technometrics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, L.L. (1999). Interpersonal Harmony and Conflict: Indigenous Theories and Research. Taipei: Gui Guan (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K.K. (1987). “Face and Favor: The Chinese Power Game. ” American Journal of Sociology 92, 944-974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K.K. (1997-1998). “Guanxi and Mientze: Conflict Resolution in Chinese Society. ” Intercultural Communication Studies VII 1, 17-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, B.J. (1979). “APreliminary Model of Particularistics in Chinese Political Alliances: 'Renqing' and 'Guanxi' in a Rural Taiwanese Township. ” Chinese Quarterly 78, 237-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. (1972). Victims of Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkbride, P., S. Tang, and R.Westwood. (1991). “Chinese Conflict Preferences and Negotiating Behavior: Cultural and Psychological Influences. ” Organization Studies 12, 365-386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozan, M.K. (1997). “Culture and Conflict Management: A Theoretical Framework. ” The International Journal of Conflict Management 8, 338-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, T.J., J.C. Hwang, and B.C. Deng. (2000). “Perception and Management of Conflict: A Comparison of Taiwanese and US Business Employees. ” Intercultural Communication Studies 9, 1-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, E.S., T.P. Rholen, and P.G. Steinhoff. (1984). “Conflict: An Approach to the Study of Japan. ” In E. Krasuu, T. Rohlen, and P. Steinhoff (eds.), Conflict in Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, V.S.Y, M.H. Bond, and T.M. Singelis. (1997). “Pancultural Explanations for Life Satisfaction: Adding Relationship Harmony to Self-Esteem. ” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73, 1038-1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebra, T.S. (1984). “Nonconfrontational Strategies for Management of Interpersonal Conflicts. ” In Ellis Krasuu, Thomas Rohlen, and Patricia Steinhoff (eds.), Conflict in Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.O. and R.G. Rogan. (1991). “A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Organizational Conflict Management Behaviors. ” The International Journal of Conflict Management 2, 181-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, J. (1991). The Chinese Classics: With a Translation, Critical and Exegetical Notes, Prelegomena, and Copious Indexes by James Legge. Taipei: SMC Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K. (1988). “Some Determinants of Conflict Avoidance. ” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 19, 125-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K. (1996). “The Role of Harmony in Conflict Avoidance. ” Paper presented at 50th Anniversary Conference of the Korean Psychological Association, Seoul.

  • Leung, K. (1997). “Negotiation and Reward Allocations Across Cultures. ” In P.C. Earley and M. Erez (eds.), New Perspectives on International Industrial-Organizational Psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K., S.K. Su, and M.W. Morris. (2001). “Justice in the Culturally DiverseWorkplace: The Problems of Over and Under Emphasis of Cultural Differences. ” In S. Gilliland, D. Steiner, and D. Skarlicki (eds.), Research in Social Issues in Management, Vol. 1. Information Age Publishing.

  • Leung, K. and D.W. Tjosvold. (1998). “Introduction: Conflict Management in the Asia Pacific. ” In K. Leung and D.W. Tjosvold (eds), Conflict Management in the Asia Pacific. Wiley: Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K. and P.G. Wu. (1990). “Dispute Processing: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. ” In R.W. Brislin (ed.), Applied Cross-Cultural Psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K. and P.G.Wu. (1998). “Harmony as a Double-Edge Sword in Management. ” In B.S. Cheng, K.L. Huang, and C.C. Kuo (eds.), Human Resources Management in Taiwan and China. Taiwan: Yuan Liou Publishing. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, C.P. and B.L. Dempsey. (1985). “Experiences in Training Chinese Business People to Use U.S. Management Techniques. ” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 21, 65-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M.W. and K. Leung. (2000). “Justice for All? Progress in Research on Cultural Variation in the Psychology of Distributive and Procedural Justice. ” Applied Psychology: An International Review 49, 100-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M.W., K.Y.Williams, K. Leung, D. Bhatnagar, J.F. Li, M. Kondo, J.L. Luo, and J.C. Hu. (1999). “Culture, Conflict Management Style, and Underlying Values: Accounting for Cross-National Differences in Styles of Handling Conflicts Among US, Chinese, Indian and Filipino Managers. ” Journal of International Business Studies 29, 729-748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadar, L. (1990). Harmony Ideology: Justice and Control in a Zapotec Mountain Village. Stanford, CA. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patten, C. (1998). East and West: The Last Governor of Hong Kong on Power, Freedom and the Future. London: Mcmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J.L. (1998). “Face, Harmony, and Social Structure: An Analysis of Organizational Behavior Across Cultures. ” Personnel Psychology 51, 1029-1032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohbuchi K. (1998). “Conflict Management in Japan: Cultural Values and Efficacy. ” In K. Leung and D. Tjosvold (eds.), Conflict Management in the Asia Pacific: Assumptions and Approaches in Diverse Cultures. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohbuchi, K., O. Fukushima, and J. Tedeschi. (1999). “Cultural Values in Conflict Management: Goal Orientation, Goal Attainment, and Tactical Decision. ” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 30, 51-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohbuchi, K., M. Suzuki, and Y. Hayashi. (2001). “Conflict Management and Organizational Attitudes Among Japanese: Individual and Group Goals and Justice. ” Asian Journal of Social Psychology 4, 93-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M.A. (1983). “A Measurement of Styles of Handling Interpersonal Conflict. ” Academy of Management Journal 26, 368-376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M.A. (1986). Managing Conflict in Organizations. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding, S.G. (1983). The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism. New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding, S.G. and M. Ng. (1982). “The Role of Face in Organizational Perceptions of Chinese Managers. ” Organization Studies 3, 201-219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salk, J.E. and M.Y. Brannen. (2000). “National Culture, Networks, and Individual Influence in a Multinational Management Team. ” Academy of Management Journal 43, 191-203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S.H. (1992). “Toward a Psychological Structure of Human Values. ” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53, 878-891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shwartz, S.H. (1992). “Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in Two Countries. ” In M.P. Zanna (ed.), Advances in Experimental and Social Psychology 25. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P.B. and M.H. Bond. (1994). Social Psychology Across Cultures. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, R.L., E.A. Morse, and G.T. Savage. (1995). “What are the Key Dimensions Underlying Choice of Conflict Management Strategies?” Paper Presented at the Annual Convention of the Academy of Management.

  • Thomas, K. (1976). “Conflict and Conflict Management. ” In M. Dunnette (ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organization Psychology. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ting-Toomey S. (1988). “Intercultural Conflict Styles: A Face-Negotiation Theory. ” In Y. Kim and W. Gudykunst (eds.), Theories in Intercultural Communication Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D., C. Hui, and K.S. Law. (1998). “Empowerment in the Manager-Employee Relationship in Hong Kong: Interdependence and Controversy. ” Journal of Social Psychology 138, 624-636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D., K. Leung, and D.W. Johnson. (2000). “Cooperative and Competitive Conflict in China. ” In M. Deutsch and P.T. Coleman (eds.), The Handbook of Conflict Resolution. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D., R. Nibler, and P.Wan. (2001). “Motivation for Conflict Among Chinese University Students: Effects of Others' Expertise and One's Own Confidence on Engaging in Conflict. ” Journal of Social Psychology 141, 353-365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D. and H. Sun. (2000). “Social Face in Conflict: Effects of Affronts to Person and Position in China. ” Group Dynamics 4, 259-271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A.S. and J.L. Farh. (1997). “Where Gunaxi Matters: Relational Demography and Gunaxi in the Chinese Context. ” Work and Occupations 24, 56-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T. (1988). “The Provision of a Sanctioning System in the United States and Japan. ” Social Psychology Quarterly 51, 265-271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T., K.S. Cook, and M.Watabe. (1998). “Uncertainty, Trust, and Commitment Formation in the United States and Japan. ” American Journal of Sociology 104, 165-194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T., N. Jin, and A.S. Miller. (1998). “In-Group Bias and Culture of Collectivism. ” Asian Journal of Social Psychology 1, 315-328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T. and M. Yamagishi. (1994). “Trust and Commitment in the United States and Japan. ” Motivation and Emotion 18, 9-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M.M. (1986). The Art of Social Relationships and Exchange in China. Berkerly, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, City University of Hong Kong, PRC

    Kwok Leung & Lin Lu

  2. Department of Communication, University of Arizona, USA

    Pamela Tremain Koch

Authors
  1. Kwok Leung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pamela Tremain Koch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lin Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leung, K., Koch, P.T. & Lu, L. A Dualistic Model of Harmony and its Implications for Conflict Management in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 19, 201–220 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016287501806

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016287501806

  • harmony
  • conflict management
  • value
  • instrumentality
  • confucianism
  • Asia