Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Deflazacort in Comparison to Methylprednisolone and Prednisolone

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of deflazacort after oral administration (30 mg) to healthy volunteers were determined and compared with those of 20 mg of methylprednisolone and 25 mg of prednisolone.

Methods. Methylprednisolone, prednisolone and the active metabolite of deflazacort, 21-desacetyldeflazacort, were measured in plasma using HPLC. For the assessment of pharmacodynamics, differential white blood cell counts were obtained over 24 hours. An integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model was applied to link corticosteroid concentrations to the effect on lymphocytes and granulocytes.

Results. Deflazacort is an inactive prodrug which is converted rapidly to the active metabolite 21-desacetyldeflazacort. Maximum concentrations of 21-desacetyldeflazacort averaged 116 ng/ml and were observed after 1.3 h. The average area under the curve was 280 ng/ml · h, and the terminal half-life was 1.3 h. 21-Desacetyldeflazacort was cleared significantly faster than both methylprednisolone and prednisolone. The PK-PD-model was suitable to describe time course and magnitude of the observed effects. The results were consistent with reported values for glucocorticoid receptor binding affinities for the investigated compounds.

Conclusions. Due to the short pharmacokinetic half-life of its active metabolite, pharmacodynamic effects of deflazacort are of shorter duration than those of methylprednisolone and prednisolone. The PK-PD model allows good prediction of pharmacodynamic effects based on pharmacokinetic and receptor binding data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. P. Filipponi and A. Blass. Deflazacort: A new glucocorticoid. Drugs of Today 6: 329–334 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Assandri, G. Buniva, E. Martinelli, A. Perazzi, and L. Zerilli. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of deflazacort in the rat, dog, monkey and man. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 171: 9–23 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Q. Rose and W. J. Jusko. Corticosteroid analysis in biological fluids by high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 162: 273–280 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. F. Ebling, S. J. Szefler, and W. J. Jusko. Analysis, prodrug conversion, reversible metabolism of methylprednisolone. Drug Metab. Disp. 13: 296–304 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. J. Szefler, W. F. Ebling, J. W. Georgitits, and W. J. Jusko. Methylprednisolone versus prednisolone pharmacokinetics in relation to dose in adults. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 30: 323–329 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. J. Frey. Kinetics and dynamics of prednisolone, Endocrine Reviews; 8: 453–473 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. M. Frey, F. J. Frey, N. G. Holford, F. Lozada, L. Z. Benet. Prednisolone pharmacodynamics assessed by inhibition of the mixed lymphocyte reaction. Transplantation 6: 578–584 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. E. Fisher, E. A. Ludwig, and W. J. Jusko. Pharmacoimmunodynamics of methylprednisolone: Trafficking of helper T lymphocytes. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 20: 319–331 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. A. Wald, R. M. Law, E. A. Ludwig, R. R. Sloan, E. Middleton, W. J. Jusko. Evaluation of dose-related pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prednisolone in man. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 20: 567–589 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Möllmann, P. Rohdewald, J. Barth, M. Verho, H. Derendorf. Kinetics of methylprednisolone and its hemisuccinate ester. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 37: 502–507 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Barth, M. Damoiseaux, H. Möllmann, K. H. Brandis, G. Hochhaus, and H. Derendorf. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prednisolone after intravenous and oral administration. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. Toxicol. 30: 317–324 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Möllmann, P. Rohdewald, J. Barth, M. Verho, and H. Derendorf. Pharmacokinetics and dose linearity testing of methylprednisolone phosphate. Biopharm. Drug Disp. 10: 453–464 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Tanner, F. Bochner, J. Caffin, J. Halliday, and L. Powell. Dose-dependent prednisolone kinetics. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 24: 571–578 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. Luzzani, and A. Glasser. Differential binding in vitro to glucocorticoid receptors of deflazacort and prednisolone. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 76: 427–430 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Rohdewald, H. Möllmann, K. M. Müller, and G. Hochhaus. Glucocorticoid receptors in the respiratory tract. In: Bochumer Treff 1984: Rezeptoren und nervöse Versorgung des bronchopulmonalen Systems, Verlag Gedon & Reuss, Munich, 1985, pp. 223–242.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Derendorf, H. Möllmann, M. Krieg, S. Tunn, C. Möllmann, J. Barth, and H. J. Röthig. Pharmacodynamics of methylprednisolone phosphate after single intravenous administration to healthy volunteers. Pharm. Res. 8: 263–268 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Derendorf, G. Hochhaus, H. Möllmann, J. Barth, M. Krieg, S. Tunn, and C. Möllmann. Receptor-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of corticosteroids. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 33: 115–123 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Möllmann, H., Hochhaus, G., Rohatagi, S. et al. Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Deflazacort in Comparison to Methylprednisolone and Prednisolone. Pharm Res 12, 1096–1100 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016287104656

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016287104656

Navigation