Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bird diversity and selection of protected areas in a large neotropical forest tract

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The unbroken primary rain forest currently covering the interior ofFrench Guiana still offers a unique opportunity to establish a network of largeprotected areas. Bird species richness was surveyed within 20 study areasspreadover the country to assess the relative abundance and frequency of occurrenceofforest interior and natural gap taxa (391 species, excluding raptors andnon-resident birds). Richness, rarity, restricted range, hot spot andconservation value algorithms were used to rank sites in decreasing orders ofimportance and draw sets of survey sites likely to maximize bird diversity. Inmost sets from different methodological approaches, the southern regionconsistently emerged as a priority area for conservation, with the centralmountain range contributing some specialized taxa and the northern regionincorporating additional species, mostly from marginal habitats and moretypicalof the nearby coastal zone. Estimates of areas likely to preserve an almostcomplete sample of the regional biodiversity amounted to about 1–2millionhectares, either in one large area (national park) or divided into 2–3reserves overlapping regional hot spots. However, representation of all speciesand habitats in a protected area system is not an assurance of long-termviability when minimum viable population sizes and demographic patterns arelittle known, and when the risks and impacts of persistent human disturbancessuch as mining, logging and hunting are growing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Able K.P. and Noon B.R. 1976. Avian community structure along elevational gradients in the north eastern United States. Oecologia 26: 275–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmford A. 1998. On hot spots and the use of indicators for reserve selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedward M., Pressey R.L. and Keith D.A. 1992. A new approach for selecting fully representative reserve networks: addressing efficiency, reserve design and land suitability with an iterative analysis. Biological Conservation 62: 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belbin L. 1993. Environmental representativeness: regional partitioning and reserve selection. Biological Conservation 66: 223–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdlife International 2000. Threatened Birds of theWorld. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain and Birdlife International, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blancanaux P. 1981. Essai sur le milieu naturel de la Guyane Française. Travaux et Documents de l'ORSTOM, Cayenne, 126 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • CNRS-ORSTOM 1979. Atlas des departements franc¸ais d'Outre-Mer, Vol. IV, La Guyane. CNRSORSTOM, Bordeaux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curnutt J., Lockwood J., Luh H.K., Nott P. and Russell G. 1994. Hot spots and species diversity. Nature 367: 326–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels R.J., Hedge M., Joshi N.V. and Gadgil M. 1991. Assigning conservation value: a case study from India. Conservation Biology 5: 464–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Granville J.J. 1979. Végétation Atlas des départements franc¸ais d'Outre-Mer, Vol. IV, La Guyane. CNRS-ORSTOM, Bordeaux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond J.M. 1978. Critical areas for maintaining viable populations of species. In: Holgate M.W. and Woodman M.D. (eds), The Breakdown and Restoration of Ecosystems. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith D.P. and Walker P.A. 1996. How do indicator groups provide information about the relative biodiversity of different sets of areas? On hot spots, complementarity and pattern-based approaches. Biodiversity Letters 3: 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flather C.H., Wilson K.R., Dean D.J. and McComb W.C. 1997. Identifying gaps in conservation networks: of indicators and uncertainty in geographic-based analyses. Ecological Applications 7: 531–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin I.R. 1980. Evolutionary change in small populations. In: Soulé M.E. and Wilcox B.A. (eds), Conservation Biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston K.J. 1996. Biodiversity congruence. Progress in Physics and Geography 20: 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston K.J., Blackburn T.M., Greenwood J.J., Gregory R.D., Quinn R.M. and Lawton J.H. 2000. Abundance–occupancy relationships. Journal of Applied Ecology 37: 39–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guissan A. and Zimmermann N.E. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135: 147–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff M. 1991. Liste des milieux, habitats et formations végétales de Guyane Collection Patrimoines Naturels. Série Patrimoine Ecologique 5: 1–24. Sécrétariat Faune et Flore, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard P.C., Viskanic P., Davenport T.R.B., Kigenyi F.W., Baltzer M., Dickinson C.J. et al. 1998. Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda. Nature 394: 472–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard P.C., Davenport T.R., Kigenyi F.W., Viskanic P., Baltzer M.C., Dickinson G.J. et al. 2000. Protected area planning in the tropics. Uganda's national system of nature reserves. Conservation Biology 14: 858–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw M., Williams P.H. and Mace G.M. 1994. Conservation of Afrotropical antelopes: consequences and efficiency of using different sites selection methods and diversity criteria. Biodiversity and Conservation 3: 354–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiester A.R., Scott J.M., Csuti B., Butterfield B., Sahr K. and White D. 1996. Conservation prioritization using GAP data. Conservation Biology 10: 127–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick J.B. 1983. An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example in Tasmania. Biological Conservation 25: 127–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard A.T. 1995. The problems with multi-species conservation: do hot spots, ideal reserves and existing reserves coincide? South African Journal of Zoology 30: 145–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules C.R. and Nicholls A.O. 1987. Assessing the conservation value of remnant habitat islands: small patches on the western Eyre Peninsula, South Australia. In: Saunders D.A., Arnold G.W., Burbidge A. and Hopkins A.J. (eds), Nature Conservation: The Role of Remnants of Native Vegetation. Surrey Beatty, Chipping Norton, Australia, pp. 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules C.R. and Usher M.B. 1981. Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: a review. Biological Conservation 21: 79–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules C.R., Nicholls A.O. and Pressey R.L. 1988. Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity. Biological Conservation 43: 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer de Schauensee R. and Phelps W.H. 1978. A Guide to the Birds of Venezuela. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls A.O. and Margules C.R. 1993. An upgraded reserve selection algorithm. Biological Conservation 64: 164–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss R.F. 1990. Indicators for measuring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conservation Biology 4: 355–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast J.R. and Eversham B.C. 1997. Species richness covariance in higher taxa: empirical tests of the biodiversity indicator concept. Ecography 20: 210–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey R.L., Humphries C.J., Margules C.R., Vane-Wright R.I. and Williams P.H. 1993. Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 124–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz D.R., Cairns S. and Dillon T. 1986. Seven forms of rarity and their frequency in the flora of the British Isles. In: Soulé M.E. (ed.), Conservation Biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 182–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid W.V. 1998. Biodiversity hot spots. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 275–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyers B., van Jaarsveld A.S. and Krüger M. 1999. Complementarity as a biodiversity indicator strategy. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, Series B 267: 505–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgely R.S. and Tudor G. 1989–1994. The Birds of South America,Vols. I and II. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues A.S., Cerdeira J.O. and Gaston K.J. 2000. Flexibility, efficiency, and accountability: adapting reserve selection algorithms to more complex conservation problems. Ecography 23: 565–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryti R. 1992. Effects of the focal taxon of the selection of nature reserves. Ecological Applications 2: 404–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saethersdal M., Line J.M. and Birks H.J.B. 1993. How to maximise biological diversity in nature reserve selection: vascular plants and breeding birds in deciduous woodlands, western Norway. Biological Conservation 66: 131–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz M.W. 1999. Choosing the appropriate scale of reserves for conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 83–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott J.M., Davis F., Csuti B., Noss F., Butterfield B., Groves C. et al. 1993. Gap analysis: a geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife Monographs 123. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer C.L. 1990. Nature Reserves. Island Theory and Conservation Practice. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer M.L. 1987. Minimum viable populations: coping with uncertainty. In: Soulé M. (ed.), Viable Populations for Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton A.R. 1995. Biodiversity at the molecular genetic level: experiences from disparate microorganisms. In: Hawksworth D.L. (ed.), Biodiversity. Measurement and estimation. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh J. and Andresen E. 1998. The composition of Amazonian forests: patterns at local and regional scales. Journal of Tropical Ecology 14: 645–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiollay J.M. 1985. Raptor community structure of a primary rain forest in French Guiana and effect of human hunting pressure. Raptor Research 18: 117–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiollay J.M. 1994. Structure, density and rarity in an amazonian forest bird community. Journal of Tropical Ecology 10: 449–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiollay J.M. 2002. Large scale bird distribution and diversity patterns across a tropical forest landscape (French Guiana). Journal of Tropical Ecology (in press).

  • Underhill L.G. 1994. Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithms. Biological Conservation 70: 85–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright R.I., Humphries C.J. and Williams P.H. 1991. What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice. Biological Conservation 55: 235–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M. 1988. Relationship of species number to area, distance and other variables. In: Myers A.M. and Giller P.S. (eds), Analytical Biogeography. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 91–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H. and Araujo M.B. 2000. Using probability of persistence to identify important areas for biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, Series B 267: 1959–1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H. and Gaston K.J. 1994. Measuring more of biodiversity: can higher taxon richness predict wholesale species richness? Biological Conservation 67: 211–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H. and Gaston K.J. 1998. Biodiversity indicators: graphical techniques, smoothing and searching for what makes relationship work. Ecography 21: 551–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H., Gibbons D., Margules C., Rebelo A., Humphries C. and Pressey R. 1996. A comparison of richness hot spots, rarity hot spots and complementary areas for conserving diversity of British birds. Conservation Biology 10: 155–174.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire d'Ecologie, E.N.S., 46 rue d'Ulm, 75230, Paris Cedex 05, France

    Jean-Marc Thiollay

Authors
  1. Jean-Marc Thiollay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thiollay, JM. Bird diversity and selection of protected areas in a large neotropical forest tract. Biodiversity and Conservation 11, 1377–1395 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016269813160

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016269813160

Search

Navigation