Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effect of Moisture on the Mechanical and Powder Flow Properties of Microcrystalline Cellulose

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. This study determined the effects of moisture on the mechanical and powder flow properties of microcrystalline cellulose.

Methods. A variety of mechanical properties were determined as a function of solid fraction at moisture levels ranging from 0 to 12.2% and included: compaction pressure required to form a compact, dynamic indentation hardness, quasi-static indentation hardness, tensile strength, best case and worst case Bonding Index, Brittle Fracture Index, Strain Index, Compressibility Index and shear cell index.

Results. Significant changes were observed as the moisture level of microcrystalline cellulose increased. The compaction pressure required to produce a compact at a solid fraction of 0.6 decreased with increasing moisture content. The permanent deformation pressure and tensile strength of compacts were observed to be relatively independent of moisture content below about 5% moisture and then decrease as the moisture content increased further. The “best case” Bonding Index was also observed to be independent of moisture content below 5% and then increase with increasing moisture. The Brittle Fracture Index and “worst case” Bonding Index, however, did not appear to be affected by changes in moisture content. Powder flow was shown to decrease with increasing moisture content.

Conclusions. These mechanical property data are consistent with the hypothesis that water acts as a plasticizer and influences the mechanical properties of microcrystalline cellulose. At moisture levels above about 5%, the material exhibits significant changes consistent with a transition from the glassy state to the rubbery state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

REFERENCES

  1. F. Khan, N. Pilpel, and S. Ingram. The effect of moisture on the density, compaction and tensile strength of microcrystalline cellulose. Powder Tech. 54:161–164 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Malamataris, P. Goidas, and A. Dimitriou. Moisture sorption and tensile strength of some tableted direct compression excipients. Int. J. Pharm. 68:51–60 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. W. Radebaugh, S. R. Babu, and J. N. Bondi. Characterization of viscoelastic properties of compacted pharmaceutical powders by a novel nondestructive technique. Int. J. Pharm. 57:95–105 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. A. Oksanen and G. Zografi. The Relationship Between the Glass Transition Temperature and Water Vapor Absorption by Poly(vinylpyrrolidone). Pharm. Res. 7:654–657 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Zografi and M. J. Kontny. The interactions of water with cellulose-and starch-derived pharmaceutical excipients. Pharm. Res. 3:187–194 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. USP XXII/NF XVII; United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc. p. 1916 (1990).

  7. S. Balog and E. N. Hiestand. Tablet press. US Patent 4,880,373. (1989).

  8. E. N. Hiestand and D. P. Smith. Indices of tableting performance. Powder Tech. 38:145–159 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. N. Hiestand and D. P. Smith. Tablet Bond II. Experimental check of model. Int. J. Pharm. 67:231–246 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. N. Hiestand, J. E. Wells, C. B. Peot, and J. F. Ochs. Physical processes of tableting. J. Pharm. Sci. 66:510–519 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. N. Hiestand, J. M. Bane, and E. P. Strzelinski. Impact test for hardness of compressed powder compacts. J. Pharm. Sci. 60:758–763 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. N. Hiestand and S. Balog. Hardness impact tester. U.S. Patent 4,885,933. (1989).

  13. E. N. Hiestand, S. Balog, and D. D. Gleason. Slow strain rate shear strength tester for compact. US Patent 4,957,003. (1990).

  14. D. D. Gleason, L. R. Carter, and T. P. Frey. Multifunction tablet tester. U.S. Patent 5140861. (1992).

  15. E. N. Hiestand. The basis for practical applications of the tableting indices. Pharm. Tech. 13:54–ff (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. N. Hiestand and D. P. Smith. Tablet bond I: A theoretical model. Int. J. Pharm. 67:217–229 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. L. Carr. Evaluating flow properties of solids. Chem. Eng. 72:163–168 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. H. Nash, G. G. Leiter, and A. P. Johnson. Effects of antiagglomerant agents on physical properties of finely divided solids. I&EC Prod. Res. & Dev. 4:140–145 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. N. Hiestand and C. J. Wilcox. Shear cell measurements of powders: Proposed procedures for elucidating the mechanistic behavior of powder beds in shear. J. Pharm. Sc. 57:1421–1427 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. N. Hiestand, S. C. Valvani, C. B. Peot, E. P. Strzelinski, and J. F. Glasscock. Shear cell measurements of powders: Determination of yield loci. J. Pharm. Sci. 62:1513–1517 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. D. Ashton, D. C. Cheng, R. Farley, and F. H. H. Valentin. Some investigations into the strength and flow properties of powders. Rheol. Acta. 4:206–218 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  22. G. Zografi and M. J. Kontny. The interactions of water with cellulose and starch derived pharmaceutical excipients. Pharm. Res. 3:187–194 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  23. C. A. Oksanen and G. Zografi. Molecular mobility in mixtures of absorbed water and poly(vinylpyrrolidone). Pharm. Res. 10:791–799 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Gordon and J. S. Taylor. Ideal co-polymers and the second order transitions of synthetic rubbers. 1. Non-crystalline copolymers. J. Appl. Chem. 2:493–500 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  25. B. C. Hancock and G. Zografi. The relationship between the glass transition temperature and the water content of amorphous pharmaceutical solids. Pharm. Res. 11:471–477 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  26. D. Faroongsarng and G. E. Peck. The swelling and water uptake of tablets III: Moisture sorption behavior of tablet disintegrants. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 20:779–798 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. G. Hollenbeck, G. E. Peck, and D. O. Kildsig. Application of immersional calorimetry to investigation of solid-liquid interactions: microcrystalline cellulose-water system. J. Pharm. Sci. 67:1599–1606 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Y. Nakai, E. Fukuoka, S. Nakajima, and K. Yamamoto. Crystallinity and physical characteristics of microcrystalline cellulose. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 25:96–110 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  29. B. Hancock and G. Zografi. The use of solution theories for predicting water vapor sorption by amorphous pharmaceutical solids: A test of the Flory-Huggins and Vrentas models. Pharm. Res. 10:1262–1267 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  30. R. L. Carr. Evaluating flow properties of solids. Chem. Eng. 72:163–168 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  31. G. E. Amidon. Solving Flow and Compaction Problems. Land O'Lakes Conference. University of Wisconsin (1989).

  32. G. E. Amidon. Physical and Mechanical Property Characteristics of Pharmaceutical Materials. 1990 Arden House Conference, Harriman, NY. (1991).

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Michael E. Houghton

    Present address: Solvay Animal Health Inc., Mendota Heights, Minnesota

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Drug Delivery R&D, the Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49001

    Gregory E. Amidon

Authors
  1. Gregory E. Amidon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael E. Houghton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amidon, G.E., Houghton, M.E. The Effect of Moisture on the Mechanical and Powder Flow Properties of Microcrystalline Cellulose. Pharm Res 12, 923–929 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016233725612

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016233725612

Search

Navigation