Skip to main content
Log in

Identity-Based Conflicts: A Systemic Approach Evaluation Project

  • Published:
Negotiation Journal

Abstract

Some of the most difficult conflicts of all are those grounded in identity, which can be analyzed in both personal and societal contexts. The author's goal is to conceptualize identity-based conflict from a systems perspective. He uses ideas from psychology, social psychology, and organization theory, connecting them to concepts of “cybernetic control.” As is the case with Social Identity Theory, a major challenge for the negotiation field is to provide a better understanding of destructive forms of intergroup behavior and how belief systems allow group members to justify bad treatment of outgroup members.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Albert, S., B.E. Ashforth, and J.E. Dutton. 2000. Organizational identity and identification: Charting new waters and building bridges. Academy of Management Review 25(1): 13-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. 1985. Strategy, change, and defensive routines. Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C. A and D.A. Schon. 1978. Organizational learning. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. 1977. Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review 84: 191-215

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. 1999. The self in social psychology. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanz, M., A. Mummendey, R Mielke, and A. Klink. 1998. Responding to negative social identity: A taxonomy of identity management strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology 28: 697-729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobrow, D.G. and D.A. Norman. 1975. Some principles of memory schemata. In Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science, edited by D.G. Bobrow and A. Collins. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. 1989. On dialogue. Transcription of a meeting in Ojai, California.

  • Brown, R. 2000. Agenda 2000: Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology 30: 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R.M. 1980. Social dilemmas. American Review of Psychology 31: 169-193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erez, M. and P.C. Earley. 1993. Culture, self-identity, and work. New York. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, J.R. 1965. Defensive communication. ETC: A Review of General Semantics 22: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., S. Solomom, T. Pyszcznski, A. Rosenblatt, J. Burling, D. Lyon, L. Simon, and E. Pinel. 1999. Why do people need self-esteem? Converging evidence that self-esteem serves an anxiety-buffering function. In The self in social psychology, edited by R. Baumeister. Philadelphia. Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R.G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243-1248

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, T. 2001. Another look at identity-based conflict: The roots of conflict in the psychology of consciousness. Negotiation Journal 17(1): 35-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H.C. 1997. Negotiating national identity and self-determination in ethnic conflicts: The choice between pluralism and ethnic cleansing. Negotiation Journal 13(4): 327-341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazos, S. 1999. Judicial review of initiatives and referendums in which majorities vote on minorities democratic citizenship. Ohio State Law Journal 60(2): 399-555.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, M. 1990. The dominant communities and the cost of legitimacy. In The elusive search for peace: South Africa, Israel, Northern Ireland, edited by H. Giliomee and J. Gagiano. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, G. 1999. Making peace: The inside story of the making of the Good Friday Agreement. London. Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. 1997. Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, W.H. 1983. The dynamics and prevention of human self-destruct: The application of therapeutic intervention. In Conflict resolution technology, edited by D.W. Cole. Cleveland: Organization Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabbie, J.M. and M. Horowitz. 1969. Arousal of ingroup-outgroup bias by a chance win or loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 13: 269-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. 1974. Conflict in man-made environment. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R.J., D. Keltner, A. Ward, and L. Ross. 1995. Actual versus assumed differences in construal: Naive realism in intergroup perception and conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68(3): 404-417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. 1994. Quoted in: J.L. Casti, Complexification: Explaining a paradoxical world through the science of surprise. New York: Harper-Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P.M. 1990. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, L.F. 1994. Intractable conflicts and the role of identity. Negotiation Journal 10(4): 311-322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., ed. 1978. Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. and J.C. Turner. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In The social psychology of intergroup relations, edited by W.C. Austin and S. Worchel. Monterey, Calif.: BrooksCole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K.W. 1976. Conflict and conflict management. In Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, edited by M.D. Dunnette. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L and G. Loewenstein. 1992. Egocentric interpretations of fairness and interpersonal conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Precesses. 51: 176-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade-Benzoni, K.A., A.E. Tenbrunsel, and M.H. Bazerman. 1997. Egocentric interpretations of fairness as an obstacle to the resolution of environmental conflict. In Research on negotiation in organizations, edited by R.J. Lewicki, R.J. Bies, and B.H. Sheppard. London: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E. 1969. The social psychology of organizing. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Smyth, L.F. Identity-Based Conflicts: A Systemic Approach Evaluation Project. Negotiation Journal 18, 147–161 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016196519460

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016196519460

Keywords

Navigation