Skip to main content
Log in

Tissue Distribution of [14C]Sucrose Octasulfate following Oral Administration to Rats

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. Aluminum sucrose octasulfate (SOS) is used clinically to prevent ulcers. Under physiologic conditions, the sodium salt of this drug can be formed. Our objective was to determine whether sodium SOS was absorbed when administered orally. In addition to furthering our understanding of aluminum SOS, this study also aimed to clarify how other polyanionic drugs, such as heparin and low-molecular-weight heparins, are absorbed.

Methods. [14C]-labeled and cold sodium SOS (60 mg/kg) were given to rats by stomach tube. Radioactivity was counted in gut tissue, gut washes, and nongut tissue (i.e., lung, liver, kidney, spleen, endothelial, and plasma samples) at 3 min, 6 min, 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 4 h, and 24 h, and in urine and feces accumulated over 4 h and 24 h.

Results. Peak radioactivity was found in the tissue and washes of the stomach, ileum, and colon at 6 min, 60 min, and 4 h, respectively, showing progression through the gut. Gut recovery accounted for 84% of the dose at 6 min but only 12% of the dose at 24 h, including counts from feces. Radioactivity was recovered from nongut tissue (averaging 8.6% of the dose) and accumulated urine (18% of the dose at 24 h). When total body distribution was considered, the recovery of radioactivity was greater for the endothelium than for plasma (peak percentage of the dose was 65% at 15 min, 20% at 3 min, 5% from 20 to 240 min for the vena cava, aortic endothelium, and plasma, respectively).

Conclusions. Results indicate that sodium SOS is absorbed, agreeing with previous studies demonstrating the oral absorption of other sulfated polyanions. Endothelial concentrations must be considered when assessing the pharmacokinetics of these compounds. The measured plasma drug concentrations reflect the much greater amounts of drug residing with the endothelium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. J. L. DePriest. Stress ulcer prophylaxis: Do critically ill patients need it? Postgrad. Med. 98:159–168 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. A. Ziller and J. C. Netchvolodoff. Uncomplicated peptic ulcer disease: An overview of formation and treatment principles. Postgrad. Med. 93:126–140 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Folkman, S. Szabo, M. Stovroff, P. Mcneil, W. Li, and Y. Shing. Duodenal ulcer: Discovery of a new mechanism and development of angiogenic therapy that accelerates healing. Ann. Surg. 214:414–425 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Szabo, P. Vattay, E. Scarbrough, and J. Folkman. Role of vascular factors, including angiogenesis, in the mechanisms of action of sucralfate. Am. J. Med. 91:158S–160S (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  5. O. Iqbal, S. Aziz, D. Hoppenstead, S. Ahmad, J. Walenga, M. Bakhos, and J. Fareed. Emerging anticoagulant and thrombolytic drugs. Emerging Drugs 6:111–135 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. J. Lorentsen, C. W. Hendrix, J. M. Collins, D. M. Kornhauser, B. G. Petty, R. W. Klecker, C. Flexner, R. H. Eckel, and P. S. Lietman. Dextran sulfate is poorly absorbed after oral administration. Ann. Intern. Med. 111:561–566 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. A. Faaij, N. Srivastava, J. M. van-Griensven, R. C. Schoemaker, C. Kluft, J. Burggraaf, and A. F. Cohen. The oral bioavailability of pentosan polysulphate sodium in healthy volunteers. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 54:929–935 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. Salartash, M. Lepore, M. D. Gonze, B. A. Leone, R. Baughman, S. W. Charles, J. C. Bowen, and S. R. Money. Treatment of experimentally induced caval thrombosis with oral low molecular weight heparin and delivery agent in a porcine model of deep venous thrombosis. Ann. Surg. 231:789–794 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. B. Jaques, L. M. Hiebert, and S. M. Wice. Evidence from endothelium of gastric absorption of heparin and of dextran sulfates 8000. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 117:122–130 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. M. Hiebert, S. M. Wice, T. Ping, D. Herr, and V. Laux. Antithrombotic efficacy in a rat model of the low molecular weight heparin, reviparin sodium, administered by the oral route. Thromb. Haemost. 85:114–118 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. A. Ofosu. Pharmacological actions of sulodexide. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 24:127–138 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. C. Nickel, B. Johnston, J. Downey, J. Barkin, P. Pommerville, M. Gregoire, and E. Ramsey. Pentosan polysulfate therapy for chronic nonbacterial prostatitis (chronic pelvic pain syndrome category IIIA): A prospective multicenter clinical trial. Urology 56:413–417 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. M. Hiebert, S. M. Wice, L. B. Jaques, K. E. Williams, and J. M. Conly. Orally administered dextran sulfate is absorbed in HIVpositive individuals. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 133:161–170 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. M. Hiebert, S. M. Wice, N. M. McDuffie, and L. B. Jaques. The heparin target organ-the endothelium: Studies in a rat model. Q. J. Med. 86:341–348 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. M. Hiebert, S. M. Wice, T. Ping, R. E. Hileman, I. Capila, and R. J. Linhardt. Tissue distribution and antithrombotic activity of unlabeled or 14C-labeled porcine intestinal mucosal heparin following administration to rats by the oral route. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 78:307–320 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. M. Hiebert and L. B. Jaques. Heparin uptake on endothelium. Artery. 2:26–37 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. B. Jaques, S. M. Wice, and L. M. Hiebert. Determination of absolute amounts of heparin and of dextran sulfate in plasma in microgram quantities. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 115:422–432 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. A. Keele and E. Neil. Samson Wright's Applied Physiology, Oxford University Press, London, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. L. Altman and D. S. Ditmer. Biology Data Book Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, Washington, DC, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L. M. Hiebert, S. M. Wice, and L. B. Jaques. Antithrombotic activity of oral unfractionated heparin. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 28:26–29 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Lunetta and T. Salanitri. Lowering of plasma viscosity by the oral administration of the glycosaminoglycan sulodexide in patients with peripheral vascular disease. J. Intern. Med. Res. 20:45–53 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. O. Canapp, R. M. McLaughlin, J. J. Hoskinson, J. K. Roush, and M. D. Butine. Scintigraphic evaluation of dogs with acute synovitis after treatment with glucosamine hydrochloride and chondroitin sulfate. Am. J. Vet. Res. 60:1552–1557 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. Bucsi and G. Poor. Efficacy and tolerability of oral chondrotin sulfate as a symtomatic slow-acting drug for osteoarthritis (SYSADOA) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 6:31–36 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  24. L. M. Hiebert, T. Ping, and S. M. Wice. Antithrombotic activity of orally administered low molecular weight heparin (logiparin) in a rat model. Haemostasis 30:196–203 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda M. Hiebert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hiebert, L.M., Wice, S.M., Ping, T. et al. Tissue Distribution of [14C]Sucrose Octasulfate following Oral Administration to Rats. Pharm Res 19, 838–844 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016161001013

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016161001013

Navigation