Skip to main content
Log in

The pH-Dependence in the Partitioning Behaviour of (RS)-[3H]Propranolol Between MDCK Cell Lipid Vesicles and Buffer

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. The pH-dependent partitioning of (RS)-[3H]propranolol between unilamellar vesicles of MDCK cell lipids and buffer was determined.

Methods. Partitioning studies were performed by means of equilibrium dialysis at 37°C between pH 7 and 11 at a molar propranolol/lipid ratio in the membrane of 10−6.

Results. The partition-pH diagram was bell-shaped. The highest apparent partition coefficient was 1797 at pH 9.7, the lowest was 805 at pH 6.9. Curve fitting with a combination of Henderson-Hasselbalch equations revealed an inflection point at the apparent pKa of proprano-lol, i.e. 9.7, and two additional pKa values at pH 7.7 and 10.0. The first one corresponds to the pKa of free fatty acids (FFA) within lipid bilayers and the other one to the pKa of phosphatidylethanolamine (PhE). The true partition coefficients (P) of the neutral as well as the ionised solute were fitted for each ionisation status of the membrane. The highest P, i.e. 2123, was calculated for neutral propranolol in the membrane with deprotonated FFA and protonated PhE.

Conclusions. The partitioning behaviour of (RS)-[3H]propranolol in a complex membrane/buffer system can be described when considering ionisation changes of drug and lipids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. H. Miyoshi, H. Maeda, N. Tokutake, and T. Fujita. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 60:4357–4362 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. J. Alcorn, R. J. Simpson, D. E. Leahy, and T. J. Peters. Biochem. Pharmacol. 45:1775–1782 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. P. Austin, A. M. Davis, and C. N. Manners. J. Pharm. Sci. 84:1180–1183 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. M. Pauletti, and H. Wunderli-Allenspach. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 1:273–282 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Folch, M. Lees, and H. S. Stanley. J. Biol. Chem. 226:497–509 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. W. Christie. J. Chromatogr. 361:396–399 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. C. M. Stewart. Anal. Biochem. 104: 10–14 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. C. MacDonald, and A. D. Bangham. J. Membrane Biol. 7:29–53 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. C. Tsui, D. M., Ojcius, and W. L. Hubbell. Biophys. J. 49:459–468 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Lieckfeldt, J. Villalaín, J. Gómez-Fernández, and G. Lee. Pharm. Res. 12:1614–1617 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. A. Berden, R. W. Barker, and G. K. Radda. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 375:186–208 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  12. U. Hellwich, and R. Schubert. Biochem. Pharmacol. 49:511–517 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. F. Flewelling, and W. L. Hubbell. Biophys. J. 49:531–540 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  14. St. Krämer. pH-Dependent partition behaviour of 3H-(RS)-propranolol in various liposome/buffer systems. Dissertation ETH Zürich, Switzerland #11428 (1996).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krämer, S.D., Wunderli-Allenspach, H. The pH-Dependence in the Partitioning Behaviour of (RS)-[3H]Propranolol Between MDCK Cell Lipid Vesicles and Buffer. Pharm Res 13, 1851–1855 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016089209798

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016089209798

Navigation