Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reconsidering the Connection between Capacity and Governance

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High levels of sub-national policy experimentation and public cynicism about politics and government, combined with significant challenges and opportunities for governance capacity such as regionalism, globalization, and technological change call for a reconsideration of the state of capacity and the capacity of the state. Crucial questions surrounding this re-assessment include: What is the difference between government and governance? Who governs in theory and in reality? How does governance now work? Can governance and capacity keep pace with change? Reconsideration of these and related questions yields the conclusion that governance and capacity are intimately connected and that innovative, simultaneous blending of public management and civic capacities is needed to build trust and govern effectively under new and challenging conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett, Katharine, and Richard Greene. (2001). “Grading the States 2001: A Management Report Card.” Governing 14(5), p. 20, 108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broder, David S. (2000). Democracy Derailed: Initiative Campaigns and the Power of Money. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaskin, Robert J. et al. (2001). Building Community Capacity. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cisneros, Henry G. (1996). Higher Ground: Faith Communities and Community Building. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crupi, James. (1993). As quoted in Neal Peirce, Curtis Johnson, and John Hall (eds.), Citistates: How Urban America Can Prosper in a Competitive World. Washington, D.C.: Seven Locks Press, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, William R. (1992). “Strategic Intercommunity Governance Networks.” National Civic Review 81(4), p. 403-412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donahue, John D. (1997). Disunited States. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federalism Research Group. (1997). State Capacity Study: Field Research Report Form. Albany: State University of New York, Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossett, James W., Malcolm Goggin, and Carol Weissert. (2000). “Managing Medicaid Managed Care: Are States Becoming Prudent Purchasers?” Health Affairs 19(4), pp. 36-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, John W. (1990). On Leadership. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodzins, Morton. (2000). “The Federal System.” From the Report of the President's Commission on National Goals, the American Assembly, 1960, reprinted in Laurence J. O'Toole, Jr. (ed.) American Intergovernmental Relations, 3rd ed. Washington D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, David. (1993). The Fifties. New York, Villard Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, John Stuart. (1986). “Retrenchment in Phoenix, Arizona.” In George E. Peterson and Carol W. Lewis (eds.), Reagan and the Cities. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, John Stuart, and Melinda Snook Hollinshead. (2000). Connecting Public Policy and Management: The Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Experiment. Case Studies in Medicaid Managed Care. Albany: The Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, John Stuart et al. (2001). Devolving Governance While Developing Capacity: The Unusual and Somewhat Surprizing Story of Medicaid Expansion in Arizona, 2001. Report prepared for the Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, Albany, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, William (2001). “Valley Residents an Alienated, Unhappy Lot.” Arizona Republic, March1, p. A-1.

  • Joint Agency Negotiation Team on Consolidation (JANTOC). (2001). Putting the Puzzle Together: Regional Governance Possibilities. San Diego: JANTOC, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettl, Donald F. (2000). “The Transformation of Governance: Globalization, Devolution, and the Role of Government.” Public Administration Review 60(6), pp. 488-497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kresl, Peter Carl. (1993). As quoted in Peirce, Johnson, and Hall (eds.), Citistates: How Urban America Can Prosper in a Competitive World. Washington, D.C.: Seven Locks Press, p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalbandian, John. (1999). “Facilitating Community, Enabling Democracy: New Roles for Local Government Managers.” Public Administration Review 59(3), pp. 187-198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, Richard P. (2000). So You Want to Be in Government: A Handbook for Appointed Officials in America's Governments. Albany: Rockefeller Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, Richard P., and Thomas Gais. (1999). Implementing the Personal Responsibility Act of 1996: A First Look. Albany: Rockefeller Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, Richard P., and Thomas Gais. (2000). The Implementation of the Personal Responsibility Act of 1996: Commonalities, Variations, and the Challenge of Complexity. Albany: Rockefeller Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, Dorothy. (1974). Jetport: The Boston Airport Controversy. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Toole, Laurence J. (2000). American Intergovernmental Relations: Foundations, Perspectives, and Issues. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partnership for Civic Change.(2001).Ready Willing and Able -Citizens Working for Change.Charlottesville:Pew Charitable Trust.[Online ]Available at http://www.pew-partnership.org/pubs/rwa/full_report/highlights.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Neal R., Curtis W. Johnson, and John Stuart Hall. (1993). Citistates: How Urban America Can Prosper in a Competitive World. Washington, D.C.: Seven Locks Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, (1996). “New Forms of Civic Associations Can Heal Country's Bruised Psyche,” Arizona Republic Feb. 4, p. H5.

  • Putnam, Robert D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosell, Steven. (1999). Renewing Governance: Governing by Learning in the Information Age. Ontario: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, Elmer E. (1960). The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, Alexis de. (1899). Democracy in America. Translated by Henry Reeve; with a critical and biographical introduction by John Bigelow. New York: D. Appleton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (1995). Census of Governments. Washington, D.C.: Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Census Bureau, Economic Planning and Coordination.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, David. (2001). As described in Joint Agency Negotiation Team on Consolidation (JANTOC) (ed.), Putting the Puzzle Together: Regional Governance Possibilities. San Diego: JANTOC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankelovich, Daniel. (1991). Coming to Public Judgment: Making Democracy Work in a Complex World. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. www.dictionary.com

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hall, J.S. Reconsidering the Connection between Capacity and Governance. Public Organization Review 2, 23–43 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016071303640

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016071303640

Navigation