Abstract
Concepts of preservation, conservation, and development shaped in large part the debate about U.S. environmental policy at the end of the 19th century. Forest use was often the focal point of controversy. Throughout the 20th century, Americans continued debating forest use, but by the late 20th century, the assumption that 19th century beliefs prevailed had begun to create a barrier to understanding changing perspectives. This paper begins by discussing one of these new perspectives, sustainable development, which has gained international prominence since the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development after being mentioned in the 1986 World Commission on Environment and Development's Our Common Future. Following the introduction to sustainable development, this paper briefly presents the results of a 1989 study using Q methodology, which identified the emergence of sustainable development as one of several beliefs in a more complex framework of perspectives on forest use than had been assumed. In addition to sustainable development, this new framework included beliefs in nature as a community to be respected, a place for personal growth, a means for demonstrating self-reliance, and a rallying point for grassroots activism. This paper examines sustainable development in the context of these other belief types and concludes by cautioning policymakers to consider these additional policy arguments and define the policy agenda more fully.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold, D. O. (1970). 'Dimensional sampling: An approach for studying a small number of cases,' American Sociologist 5: 147–150.
Bellah, R. N., R. Madsen, W. M. Sullivan, A. Swidler and S. M. Tipton (1985). Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. NewYork: Harper & Row.
Block, J. ( 1956). 'A comparison of forced and unforced Q-sorting procedures,' Educational and PsychologicalMeasurement 16: 481–493.
Block, J.( 1961). The Q-Sort Method in Personality Assessment and Psychiatric Research. Spring-field, IL: Charles C.Th omas (Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press (1978 reprint).
Boulding, K. E. (1965). 'Earth as a space ship,' Kenneth E. Boulding Papers, Archives (Box #38), University of Colorado at Boulder Libraries, Boulder, Colorado (http://csf.colorado.edu/authors/ Boulding.Kenneth/spaceship-earth.html).
Brouwer, M. ( 1992/1993). 'Validity: Q vs.R,' Operant Subjectivity 16: 1–17.
Brown, S. R. (1980). Political Subjectivity: Applications of QMethodology in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Cobb, R. W. and C. D. Elder (1983). Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda Building. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Coke, J. G. and S. R. Brown (1976). 'Public attitudes about land use policy and their impact on state policy-makers,' Publius 6: 97–134.
Cronon, W., ed. (1995). Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Dunlap, R. E. (2000). 'Americans have positive image of the environmental movement,' Poll Analyses, April 18, 2000, The Gallup Organization (http://www.gallup.conVpoll/releases/ Pr000418.asp).
Earth Charter USA (2000). The Earth Charter Initiative/Earth Charter USA. Washington, DC: Earth Charter USA (http://www.earthcharterusa.org).
Environmental News Service (October 11, 2000).'Conservation Congress sets lofty goal: No more species loss,' Environmental News Service (http://ens.lycos.com/ens/oct2000/2000L-10-11-11.html), 11 October 2000: 1.
Fairweather, J. R. (1981). 'Reliability and validity of Q-method results: Some empirical evidence,' Operant Subjectivity 5 (1): 2–16.
Fisher, Sir R.A. (1960). The Design of Experiments, 7th ed. NewYork: Hafner (London: Oliver and Boyd (1942)).
Gargan, J. J. and S. R. Brown (1993). '''What is to be done?'' Anticipating the future and mobilizing prudence,' Policy Sciences 26: 347–359.
Hair, J. F. Jr., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and B. J. Grablowsky (1979). Multivariate Data Analysis, 1984 ed. NewYork: Macmillan Publishing Co.
Hays, S. P. (1959). Conservation and the Gospel of Eficiency: The Progressive Conservation Movement 1890-1920. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U. Press (Atheneum, 1980).
Hays, S. P. (1992). 'Environmental philosophies,' Science 258: 1822–1823.
Holdrege, C. and S. Talbott (2001). 'Sowing technology: the ecological argument against genetic engineering down on the farm,' Sierra 86 (4): 34–39.
Hooker, A. M. (1992). Beliefs and Values Regarding Society and Nature: A Framework for Listening in Forest and Environmental Policy (doctoral dissertation). New Haven, CT: Yale University.
Hooker, A. M. (1994). 'The international law of forests,' Natural Resources Journal 1994 (Fall): 823–877.
Hooker, A. M. (2001). 'Beliefs regarding society and nature: A framework for listening in forest and environmental policy,' Operant Subjectivity 24 (4): 159–177.
Institute for Sustainable Development (2000). 'Global Dialogue Highlights: Monday, 19 June 2000,' Sustainable Developments (http://www.iisd.ca/sd/gd/sdvol38numl.htinl) 38 (1): 2.
Keynes, J. M. (1921). A Treatise on Probability. London: Macmillan.
Kinsey, D and Ladd, E. C. and K. Bowman (1996). 'Public opinion on the environment,' Resources (Resources for the Future) Summer: 5–7.
Lasswell, H. D. (1931).'The measurement of public opinion,' American Political Science Review 25: 311–365.
Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. New York: Oxford University Press.
Marsh, G. P. (1864). Man and Nature: Or, Physical Geography as Modified by Human Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1965 reprint).
Miller, C. ed. (1997). American Forests: Nature, Culture, and Politics. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2001). Strategic Plan 2000.Washington, DC (http://www.nasa.gov).
National Audubon Society (1996). Creating a Culture of Conservation: Strategic Plan 1996. New York.
Natural Resources Defense Council (2001). 'Briefings: Biotech Foods-Organic Growth,' The Amicus Journal 23 (2): 9.
Pinchot, G. (1947). Breaking New Ground. San Diego, CA: Harcourt, Brace, and Co. (Washington, DC: Island Press (1987 reprint)).
President's Council on Sustainable Development (1996). Sustainable America: A New Consensus for Prosperity, Opportunity, and a Healthy Environment for the Future. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents.
Protasel, G. J. (1980). Forest Policy Institutions and Organizations: Project Module I. Vancouver, WA: Forest Policy Project, University of Washington (copy on file with author).
Rokeach, M. (1979). Understanding HumanValues: Individual and Societal. NewYork: Free Press.
Rokeach, M. (1983). RokeachValue Survey Form G. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Scarfo, R. A. (1987). 'Stewardship: The profession's grand delusion-understanding the historical grounding of stewardship defines some ethical issues for landscape architects,' Landscape Architecture 77 (3): 46–50.
Scarfo, R. A. (1988). 'Stewardship and the profession of landscape architecture,' Landscape Journal 7 (1): 60–68.
Sitarz, D., ed. (1993). Agenda Twenty One:The Earth Summit Strategy to Save Our Planet. Carbondale, IL: Nova Publishing Co.
Sokal, R. R. and Ph. H. A. Sneath (1963). Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman and Co.
Stanley, J. L., ed. (1973). The Illustrated Walden with Photographs from the Gleason Collection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Stephenson, W. (1935). 'Technique of factor analysis,' Nature 136: 297.
Stephenson, W. (1953). The Study of Behavior.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stephenson, W. (1964). 'Application of Q-method to the measurement of public opinion,' Psychological Record 14: 265–273.
Stone, C.D. (1987). Earth and Other Ethics: The Case for Moral Pluralism. New York: Harper and Row.
Tahoe Center for a Sustainable Future, 2000.Sustainable Development: Public Opinion Survey, http://www.ceres.ca.gov/tcsf/sd survey.html, July 29, 2001.
Thompson, G. C. (1886). Public Opinion and Lord Beaconsfield, reprinted as 'The Evaluation of Public Opinion,' in B. Berelson and M. Janowitz, eds. (1966). Reader in Public Opinion and Communication, (2nd ed.). NewYork: The Free Press, pp. 7–12.
van Eeten, M. (2001). 'Recasting intractable policy issues: The wider implications of The Netherlands civil aviation controversy,' Journal of Policy Analysis andManagement 20 (3): 391–414.
Walt Disney World (2001). 'Epcot: Spaceship Earth,' http://pages.prodigy.com/WaltDisney World/search.htm.
Webler, T., S. Tuler and R. Krueger (2001). 'What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public,' Environmental Management 27 (3): 435–450.
Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future. London: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clarke, A.H. Understanding sustainable development in the context of other emergent environmental perspectives. Policy Sciences 35, 69–90 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016067819764
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016067819764