Abstract
The exercise of administrative discretion is inevitable in complex policy-making and law enforcement, including immigration policy generally and the Elian Gonzalez case specifically. Clearly, discretion is in tension with democratic notions of political accountability, the rule of law, and constitutional separation of powers. Yet the Elian case suggests that although discretion poses a threat to democracy it also contributes to a democratic public administration. Furthermore, because discretion is exercised in a sea of safeguards its dangers can be reconciled to its necessity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brodkin, Evelyn Z. (1987). “Policy Politics: If We Can't Govern, Can We Manage?” Political Science Quarterly 102(4), 571-587.
Bryner, Gary C. (1987). Bureaucratic Discretion. New York: Pergamon Press.
Burke, John P. (1996). “Administrative Discretion and Responsibility: Another Look at Moral Agency and Democratic Politics.” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association annual meeting, (August 29).
Chapman, Richard A. (2000A). “Introduction.” In Ethics in Public Service for the New Millennium. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 1-8.
Chapman, Richard A. (2000B). “Ethics in Public Service for the New Millennium.” In Ethics in Public Service for the New Millennium. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 217-231.
Chevron, USA, Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 82-1005 (1984).
Coffey, Kendall, et al. (2000). “Petition for Writ of Certiorari,” in the Supreme Court of the United States, October Term, 1999, Gonzalez v. Reno, No. 99-2079, June 26.
Dalrymple v. Reno, 00-1773-CIV-Moore, (S.D. Fla. 2001).
Davis, Kenneth Culp. (1969, 1980 edn). Discretionary Justice. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, Publishers.
Duffy, Michael. (2000). “The Raid in Replay.” Time 8, 38-40.
Eig, Larry M. (2000). “The Case of Elian Gonzalez: Legal Basics,” CRS Report for Congress, RS20450. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
Epstein, Gail. (2000). “Police: Tear Gas Used as Protests Become Hostile.” The Miami Herald 8, 1B.
Fineman, Mark. (2000). “Elian Case Turns INS Policy Inside Out.” The Los Angeles Times 7, 16A.
Galligan, D.J. (1986). “Senses of Discretion.” In Discretionary Powers: A Legal Study of Official Discretion. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 1ff.
Gonzalez v. Reno, 86 F. Supp. 2d 1167, 00-206-CIV-Moore, (S.D. Fla. 2000).
Gonzalez v. Reno, 212 F. 3rd 1338, 00-11424, (11th Circuit June 1, 2000).
Gonzalez v. Reno, 00-3621-CIV-Moreno, (S.D. Fla. 2001).
Goodsell, Charles T. (1990). “Public Administration and the Public Interest.” In Gary Wamsley and others (eds.), Refounding Public Administration. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, pp. 96-113.
Handler, Joel F. (1992). “Discretion: Power, Quiescence, and Trust.” In Keith Hawkins (ed.), The Uses of Discretion. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 331-360.
Hawkins, Keith. (1992). “The Use of Legal Discretion: perspectives from Law and Social Science.” In The Uses of Discretion. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 11-46.
Immigration and Nationality Act. U.S. Code. Vol 8, secs. 1101 et. seq. (1952).
INS v. Aguirre-Aguirre, 526 U.S. 415, 97-1754, (1999).
Immigration and Naturalization Service, “Memorandum for Doris Meissner,” (January 3, 2000), by Bo Cooper.
Immigration and Naturalization Service, Operation Reunion After Action Report, published June 7, 2000 in the Miami Herald Internet Edition.
Kende, Mark S. (2000). “A Misguided Statutory Interpretation Theory: The Elian Gonzalez Cuban Asylum Case.” International Law Journal 18(2) (Fall), 201-214.
Lipsky, Michael. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Lowi, Theodore J. (1979). The End of Liberalism, 2nd ed. New York: Norton.
Mashaw, Jerry. (1994). “Prodelegation: Why Administrators Should Make Political Decisions.” In Peter H. Schuck (ed.), Foundations of Administrative Law. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 177-183.
Nieves, Gail Epstein. (2000). “Police: Tear Gas Used as Protests Become Hostile.” The Miami Herald 8, 1B.
Pearson, Michael A. (2000A). Letter to Lazaro Gonzalez (April 12), posted April 24, 2000 in the Miami Herald Internet Edition.
Pearson, Michael A. (2000B). Letter to Lazaro Gonzalez (April 14), posted April 24, 2000 in the Miami Herald Internet Edition.
Pratchett, Lawrence. (2000). “The Inherently Unethical Nature of Public Service Ethics.” In Richard A. Chapman (ed.), Ethics in Public Service for the New Millennium. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 111-126.
Rodriguez, Mary A. (2000). Application and Affidavit for Search Warrant, (April 21, 2000), posted April 24, 2000 in the Miami Herald Internet Edition.
Ramirez v. Reno, 01-02190-CIV-Gold, (S.D. Fla. 2001).
Reisman, Marcia M. (2000). “Where to Decide the 'Best Interests' of Elian Gonzalez: The Law of Abduction and International Custody Disputes.” Inter-American Law Review 31(2), 323-355.
Rubin, Edward L. (1997). “Discretion and Its Discontents.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 72, 1299-1336.
Schneider, Carl E. (1992). “Discretion and Rules: A Lawyer's View.” In Keith Hawkins (ed.), The Uses of Discretion. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 47-88.
Schuck, Peter H. (1994). “Controlling Administrative Discretion,” section introduction in Foundations of Administrative Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
Shapiro, Martin. (1994). “Discretion.” In David H. Rosenbloom and Richard D. Schwartz (eds.), Handbook of Regulation and Administrative Law. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., pp. 501-517.
Warwick, Donald P. (1981). The Ethics of Administrative Discretion.” In Joel L. Fleishman, Lance Liebman, and Mark H. Moore (eds.), Public Duties: The Moral Obligations of Government Officials. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, pp. 93-127.
Wasem, Ruth Ellen. (2000). “Cuban Migration Policy and Issues,” CRS Report for Congress, RS20468. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Serivce.
Weaver, Jay. (1999). “Cuba: Boy's Return is not negotiable.” The Miami Herald 3, 3B.
Wilson, James Q. (1980). Bureaucracy. New York: Basic Books, Inc. Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dillman, D.L. The Paradox of Discretion and the Case of Elian Gonzalez. Public Organization Review 2, 165–185 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016064728926
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016064728926