Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Lakatosian Framework to Analyze Situations of Cognitive Conflict and Controversy in Students' Understanding of Heat Energy and Temperature

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study is to analyze secondary school students' interactions (conflicts, controversies, and arguments) as they participate in an intact classroom activity designed to facilitate their understanding of heat energy and temperature. The study is based on 32 ninth-grade students in a public school in Londrina, Brazil. Results obtained show that the differentiation between heat energy and temperature constitutes considerable difficulties for the students, and can be considered as part of the “hard-core” of their understanding (Lakatos, 1970, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 91–196). Student interactions (video taped) were classified into an Alternative Model, Transitional Model, and Scientific Model, depending on the degree to which they reflected a progressive transition in their “hard-core.” Students generally resisted a change in their conceptual understanding. Some students were able to question the “hard-core” of their beliefs and construct a Transitory Model. Some students experienced a further progressive transition by constructing a Scientific Model, based on the understanding that “Temperature only measures the energy of agitation.” Methodology used also provided a glimpse of how a particular student grappled with the conflicts in order to facilitate progressive transition in understanding. It is concluded that given the opportunity to discuss, reflect, consider alternative/conflicting situations, students can construct models that increase progressively in their heuristic/explanatory power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adey, P., and Shayer, M. (1994). Really Raising Standards: Cognitive Intervention and Academic Achievement, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, M., and Millar, R. (1996). Learning the scientific 'story': A case study in the teaching and learning of elementary thermodynamics. Science Education 80: 249-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidell,T. (1988). Vygotsky, Piaget and the dialectic of development. Human Development 31: 329-348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S. G. (1976). The Kind of Motion We Call Heat: A History of the Kinetic Theory of Gases in the 19th Century (Book 1), North-Holland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual Change in Childhood, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro, R. S., and Pessoa de Carvalho, A. M. (1995). The historic approach in teaching: Analysis of an experience. Science and Education 4: 87-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (1991). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In Giere, R. (Ed.), Cognitive Models of Science: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, University of Minnesota Press, Minnesota, pp. 129-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C. A., and Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research 63: 1-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R., and Sutcliffe, N. B. (1991). What children's temperature predictions reveal of their understanding of temperature. British Journal of Educational Psychology 61: 300-309.

    Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In Forman, G., and Pufall, P. B. (Eds.), Constructivism in the Computer Age, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 49-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, A., Jungwirth, E., and Eliovitch, R. (1990). Applying the 'cognitive conflict' strategy for conceptual change-some implications, difficulties and problems. Science Education 74: 555-569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., and Mercer, N. (1987). Common Knowledge: The Development of Understanding in the Classroom, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A., and Infeld, L. (1971). The Evolution of Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. (original work published in 1938)

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, G. L. (1979). Children's conceptions of heat and temperature. Science Education 63: 221-230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, G. L. (1980). Children's viewpoints of heat: A second look. Science Education 64: 323-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eylon, B., and Linn, M. C. (1988). Learning and instruction: An examination of four research perspectives in science education. Review of Educational Research 58: 251-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Harper, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furth, H. G. (1981). Piaget and Knowledge: Theoretical Foundations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassman, M. (1994). All things being equal: The two roads of Piaget and Vygotsky. Developmental Review 14: 186-214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. G., Grayson, D. J., and Treagust, D. F. (1999). Investigating a grade 11 students' evolving conceptions of heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36: 55-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, P. W., and Hewson, M. G. (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science 13: 1-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, A. C. (1996). Development of science concepts within a Vygotskian framework. Science Education 80: 35-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. K., and Howe, A. C. (1978). The use of cognitive conflict to promote conservation acquisition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 15: 239-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesidou, S., and Duit, R. (1993). Students' conceptions of the second law of thermodynamics-An interpretative study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30: 85-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaburÚ, C. E. (1996). La crítica en la enseñanza de las ciencias: Constructivismo y contradiccíon. Enseñanza de las Ciencias 14: 93-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaburÚ, C. E., and Carvalho, A. M. P. (1995). Uma descriçao da forma do pensamento dos alunos em sala de aula. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física 17: 243-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Lakatos, I., and Musgrave, A. (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 91-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1971). History of science and its rational reconstructions. In Buck, R. C., and Cohen, R. S. (Eds.). Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science (vol. VIII), Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 91-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1974).The role of crucial experiments in science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 4: 309-325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. E. (1988). The acquisition of biological knowledge during childhood: Cognitive conflict or tabula rasa? Journal of Research in Science Teaching 25: 185-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, E. L., and Linn, M. C. (1994). Heat energy and temperature concepts of adolescents, adults, and experts: Implications for curricular improvements. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 31: 657-677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lythcott, J., and Duschl, R. (1990). Qualitative research: From methods to conclusions. Science Education 74: 445-460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskill, R., and Pedrosa de Jesus, H. (1997). Pupils' questions, alternative Frameworks and the design of science teaching. International Journal of Science Education 19: 781-799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, T. (1971). Piaget: Cognitive conflict and the motivation of thought. In Mischel, T. (Ed.), Cognitive Development and Epistemology, Academic Press, New York, pp. 311-355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, F. E. (1994). Conceptual change or conceptual profile? Science and Education 4: 267-285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M. (1995a). Chemical equilibrium and Newton's third law of motion: Ontogeny/phylogeny revisited. Interchange 26: 19-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M. (1995b). Cognitive conflict as a teaching strategy in solving chemistry problems:Adialectic-constructivist perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32: 959-970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M. (1995c). Progressive transitions from algorithmic to conceptual understanding in student ability to solve chemistry problems. A Lakatosian interpretation. Science Education 79: 19-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M. (1998). A Lakatosian conceptual change teaching strategy based on student ability to build models with varying degrees of conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium. Science and Education 7: 107-127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M. (2000). A framework to understand students' differentiation between heat energy and temperature and its educational implications. Interchange 31: 1-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, J., and Novick, S. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional Science 11: 183-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, J. (1976). A view of cognition from a formalist's perspective. In Riegel, K. F., and Meacham, J. A. (Eds.), The Developing Individual in a Changing World, Vol. 1, Mouton, The Hague, pp. 89-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1980). Adaptation and Intelligence, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. J, Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., and Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education 66: 211-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psillos, S. (1994). A philosophical study of the transition from the caloric theory of heat to thermodynamics: Resisting the pessimistic meta-induction. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 25: 159-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogan, J. M. (1988). Development of a conceptual framework of heat. Science Education 72: 103-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, J. A., and Dawson, C. J. (1983). Laboratory counterexamples and the growth of understanding in science. European Journal of Science Education 5: 203-215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, J. A., and Dawson, C. J. (1983). Equilibration, conflict and instruction: A new class-oriented perspective. European Journal of Science Education 7: 331-344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shayer, M., and Wylam, H. (1981). The development of the concepts of heat and temperature in 10-13 year-olds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 18: 419-434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. (1994). The rise and fall of constructivism. Studies in Science Education 23: 1-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavy, R., and Berkowitz, I. (1980). Cognitive conflict as a basis for teaching quantitative aspects of the concept of temperature. Science Education 64: 679-692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, S. (Ed.) (1988). Ontogeny, Phylogeny, and Historical Development, Ablex, Norwood, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strike, K. A., and Posner, G. J. (1985). A conceptual change view of learning and understanding. In West, L. H. T., and Pines, A. L. (Eds.), Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 211-231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strike, K. A., and Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In Duschl, R. A., and Hamilton, R. J. (Eds.), Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory in Practice, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, pp. 147-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villani, A. (1992). Conceptual change in science and science education. Science Education 76: 233-237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villani, A., Barolli, E., Cabral, T. C. B., Fagundes, M. B., and Yamazaki, S. (1997). Filosofia da ciência e psicanálise: Analogias para o ensino de ciências. Cadernos Catarinense de Ensino de Física 14: 37-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Learning as a constructive activity. In Janvier, C. (Ed.), Problems of Representation in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 3-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S., and Brewer, W. F. (1987). Theories of knowledge restructuring in development. Review of Educational Research 57: 51-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiser, M. (1988). The differentiation of heat and temperature: History of science and novice-expert shift. In Strauss, S. (Ed.), Ontogeny, Phylogeny, and the Historical Development, Ablex, Norwood, NJ, pp. 28-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiser, M., and Carey, S. (1983). When heat and temperature were one. In Gentner, D., and Stevens, A. L. (Eds.), Mental Models, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 267-297.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Brazil

    Carlos Eduardo Laburú

  2. Department of Chemistry, Universidad de Oriente, Apartado Postal 90, Cumaná, Estado Sucre, Venezuela, 6101A

    Mansoor Niaz

Authors
  1. Carlos Eduardo Laburú
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mansoor Niaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mansoor Niaz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laburú, C.E., Niaz, M. A Lakatosian Framework to Analyze Situations of Cognitive Conflict and Controversy in Students' Understanding of Heat Energy and Temperature. Journal of Science Education and Technology 11, 211–219 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016064301034

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016064301034

Search

Navigation