Skip to main content
Log in

Anionic Gels as Vehicles for Electrically-Modulated Drug Delivery. I. Solvent and Drug Transport Phenomena

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the in vitro behavior of anionic gels as formulation matrices for electrically-modulated drug delivery. Agarose and combinations of agarose with other anionic polymers (carbomer 934P; xanthan gum) were selected and tested to evaluate their potential for drug delivery.

Methods. Electrical current was applied by an automatic crossover power supply to minimize the current fluctuation. Hydrocortisone was selected as the model drug in order to minimize electrostatic interference with drug transport. Syneresis and drug migration were evaluated as a function of current application time and the intensity of electrical current.

Results. The data show that electrical current strength and gellant content can affect both the syneresis and drug migration. A linear correlation was found between hydrocortisone loss and mass loss via the exudate. Moreover, in agarose-carbomer 934P gel systems, cumulative gel mass loss is a linear function of time at low intensities of electrical current (e.g., 0.5 mA and 1 mA). However, hydrocortisone distribution, after electrical application, is relatively asymmetric in those agarose-carbomer 934P gels (and in agarose-xanthan gum gels) in contrast to gel matrices containing only agarose.

Conclusions. In this study, the use of carbomer 934P in conjunction with agarose enables the formulator to achieve zero-order release with electrical application. Increased anisotropicity of a gel system due to the application of electrical current could alter the effectiveness of a drug delivery system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. J. E. Riviere, B. Sage, and P. L. Williams. J. Pharm. Sci. 80:615–620 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. B. Bommannan, L. Leung, and R. O. Potts. Proceed. Intern. Symp. Control. Rel. Bioact. Mater. 20:90–91 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. P. Schwendeman, V. Labhasetwar, and R. J. Levy. Pharm. Res. 12:790–795 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Glikfeld, C. Cullander, R. S. Hinz, and R. H. Guy. Pharm. Res. 5:443–446 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. G. Green, R. S. Hinz, A. Kim, F. C. Szoka, Jr., and R. H. Guy. Pharm. Res. 8:1121–1127 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Neumann, A. E. Sowers, and C. A. Jordan, Eds., Electroporation and Electrofusion in Cell Biology. Plenum, New York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. R. Prausnitz, V. G. Bose, R. Langer, and J. C. Weaver, Proceed. Intern. Symp. Control. Rel. Bioact. Mater. 19:232–233 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. K. Banga and Y. W. Chien. Pharm. Res. 10:697–702 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y. B. Bannon, J. Corish, and O. I. Corrigan. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 13:2617–2630 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Groning. Int. J. Pharm. 36:37–40 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. B. Phipps, R. Haak, S. Chao, S. K. Gupta, and J. R. Gyory. Proceed. Intern. Symp. Control. Rel. Bioact. Mater. 21:320–321 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Sawahata, M. Hara, H. Yasunaga, and Y. Osada. J. Control. Release 14:253–262 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. H. Yuk, S. H. Cho, and H. B. Lee. Pharm. Res. 9:955–957 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Kishi, M. Hara, K. Sawahata, and Y. Osada. In DeRossi et al. (ed.), Polymer Gels, Plenum Press, New York, 1991, pp:205–216.

    Google Scholar 

  15. T. Kurauchi, T. Shiga, Y. Hirose, and A. Okada. In DeRossi et al. (ed.), Polymer Gels, Plenum Press, New York, 1991, pp:237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Serres, M. Baudys, and S. W. Kim. Pharm. Res. 13:196–201 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. Tanaka, I. Nishio, S.-T. Sun, and S. Ueno-Nishio. Science 218:467–469 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Tomer, D. Dimitrijevic, and A. T. Florence. Proceed. Intern. Symp. Control. Rel. Bioact. Mater. 21:648–649 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  19. T. Tanaka. Gels. Sci. Amer. 244:124–138 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. J. Pikal. Pharm. Res. 7:118–126 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. M. Sims, W. I. Higuchi, and V. Srinivasan. Pharm. Res. 9:1402–1409 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hsu, CS., Block, L.H. Anionic Gels as Vehicles for Electrically-Modulated Drug Delivery. I. Solvent and Drug Transport Phenomena. Pharm Res 13, 1865–1870 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016045427545

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016045427545

Navigation