Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An integrative approach for the conservation and management of South Africa's floristic diversity at the provincial level

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a party to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), South Africais obliged to ensure that CBD objectives are met. Fundamental to the concept ofbiodiversity are the different levels of biological organization ranging fromlandscapes to genes. Historically, biodiversity conservation has predominantlyfocussed on species, while southern African nature reserves were generally notestablished with biodiversity criteria under consideration. This paper describesan integrative approach to conserving and managing all levels of biodiversity inGauteng, the smallest province in South Africa. Utilizing land cover andvegetation maps for the province, higher level biodiversity considerations willincorporate principles of landscape ecology together with gap analysis anditerative techniques, while lower level biodiversity considerations will involvethe assessment of the status and distribution of Red Data plant species in theprovince. As the final output, a map will be created within a GeographicInformation System depicting priority conservation areas with associated broadmanagement recommendations. A landscape mosaic with simple management guidelinesfor landowners will attempt to facilitate the conservation of landscapeprocesses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bond W.J., Vlok J. and Viviers M. 1984.Variation in seedling recruitment of Cape Proteaceae after fire. Journal of Ecology 72: 209-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocks K.D. and Baird I.A. 1989. Using mathematical programming to address the multiple reserve selection problem: an example from the Eyre Peninsula, South Australia. Biological Conservation 49: 113-130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowling R.M. and Hilton-Taylor C. 1994. Patterns of plant diversity and endemism in southern Africa: an overview. In: Huntley B.J. (ed.), Botanical Diversity in Southern Africa. Strelitzia 1. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, South Africa, pp. 31-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism 1997. White Paper on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of South Africa' Biological Diversity.

  • Development Bank of Southern Africa 1995.South Africa' nine provinces: a human development profile. Development Information Paper 28. Development Information Group: Centre for Policy, Information and Evaluation.

  • Fiedler P.L. 1987. Life history and population dynamics of rare and common Mariposa lilies (Calochortus pursh: Liliaceae). Journal of Ecology 75: 977-995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith J. and Sagar G.R. 1981. Biological causes of local rarity in Carlina vulgaris. In: Synge H. (ed.), The Biological Aspects of Rare Plant Conservation. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp. 389-400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntley B.J. and Matos E.M. 1994. Botanical diversity and its conservation in Angola. In: Huntley B.J. (ed.), Botanical Diversity in Southern Africa. Strelitzia 1. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, South Africa, pp. 53-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN 2000. IUCN Red List Categories. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings M.D. 1995. Gap analysis today: a confluence of biology, ecology, and geography for management of biological resources. Wildlife Society Bulletin 23: 658-662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan W.R., Peters R.L. and Allen E.B. 1988. Ecological restoration as a strategy for conserving biological diversity. Environmental Management 12: 55-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick J.B. 1983. An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biological Conservation 25: 127-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont B.B., Connell S.W. and Bergl S.M. 1991. Seed bank and population dynamics of Banksia cuneata: the role of time, fire, and moisture. Botanical Gazette 152: 114-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont B.B., Klinkhamer P.G.L. and Witkowski E.T.F. 1993. Population fragmentation may reduce fertility to zero in Banksia goodii-a demonstration of the Allee effect. Oecologia 94: 446-450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low A.B. and Rebelo A.G. 1996. Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Pretoria, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggs G.L., Kolberg H.H. and Hines C.J.H. 1994. Botanical diversity in Namibia-an overview. In: Huntley B.J. (ed.), Botanical Diversity in Southern Africa. Strelitzia 1. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, South Africa, pp. 93-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules C.R. 1989. Introduction to some Australian developments in conservation evaluation. Biological Conservation 50: 1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules C.R., Nicholls A.O. and Pressey R.L. 1988. Selecting networks of reserves to maximize biological diversity. Biological Conservation 43: 63-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabhan G.P. 1995. The dangers of reductionism in biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology 9: 479-481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Njuguna S. 1994. International conventions. In: Huntley B.J. (ed.), Botanical Diversity in Southern Africa. Strelitzia 1. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, South Africa, pp. 387-392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss R.F. 1983. A regional landscape approach to maintain diversity. BioScience 33: 700-706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss R.F. 1987. From plant communities to landscapes in conservation inventories: a look at the nature conservancy. Biological Conservation 41: 11-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connell M.A. and Noss R.F. 1992. Private land management for biodiversity conservation. Environmental Management 16: 435-450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik B.M. and Manning E. 1993. Assessing the limitations on the growth of endangered planpopulations. I. Experimental demography of Erysimum capitatum ssp. Angustatum and Oenothera deltoides ssp. Howellii. Biological Conservation 65: 257-265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik B.M., Nickrent D.L. and Howald A.M. 1993. The recovery of an endangered plant. I. Creating a new population of Amsinckia grandiflora. Conservation Biology 7: 510-526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfab M.F. and Witkowski E.T.F. 1999a. Contrasting effects of herbivory on plant size and reproductive performance in two populations of the critically endangered species, Euphorbia clivicola R.A. Dyer. Plant Ecology 145: 317-325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfab M.F. and Witkowski E.T.F. 1999b. Fire survival in the critically endangered succulent, Euphorbia clivicola R.A. Dyer-fire-avoider or fire-tolerant? African Journal of Ecology 37: 249-257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D., Stachow U., Takacs D.A., Brubaker H.W., Dumas A.R., Meaney J.J. et al. 1992. Conserving biological diversity in agricultural / forestry systems. BioScience 42: 354-362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey R.L. and Nicholls A.O. 1989a. Efficiency in conservation evaluation: scoring versus iterative approaches. Biological Conservation 50: 199-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey R.L. and Nicholls A.O. 1989b. Application of a numerical algorithm to the selection of reserves in semi-arid New South Wales. Biological Conservation 50: 263-278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston G.R., Siegfried W.R. and Wynberg R.P. 1995. Attitudes and policies of the directors of South African nature conservation departments toward the protection of biological diversity. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 25: 77-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raal P.A. 1988. Ecology and population biology of Euphorbia perangusta (Euphorbiaceae) in the Transvaal, South Africa. Bothalia 18: 105-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo A.G. 1994. Iterative selection procedures: centres of endemism and optimal placement of reserves. In: Huntley B.J. (ed.), Botanical Diversity in Southern Africa. Strelitzia 1. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, South Africa, pp. 231-257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sætersdal M. and Birks H.J.B. 1993. Assessing the representativeness of nature reserves using multivariate analysis: vascular plants and breeding birds in deciduous forests,Western Norway. Biological Conservation 65: 121-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sætersdal M., Line J.M. and Birks H.J.B. 1993. How to maximize biological diversity in nature reserve selection: vascular plants and breeding birds in deciduous woodlands,Western Norway. Biological Conservation 66: 131-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott J.M., Ables E.D., Edwards T.C., Eng R.L., Gavin T.A., Harris L.D. et al. 1995. Conservation of biological diversity: perspectives and the future for the wildlife profession. Wildlife Society Bulletin 23: 646-657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott J.M., Csuti B., Jacobi J.D. and Estes J.E. 1987. Species richness: a geographic approach to protecting future biological diversity. BioScience 37: 782-788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott J.M., Davis F., Csuti B., Noss R., Butterfield B., Groves C. et al. 1993. Gap analysis: a geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife Monographs 123: 1-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talukdar S. 1983. The conservation of Aloe polyphylla endemic to Lesotho. Bothalia 14: 985-989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson M.W. 1997. CSIR/ARC National Land-Cover Database Project. Data User' Manual. Phase 1 Data. ARC/CSIR, Pretoria, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timberlake J.R. and Müller T. 1994. Identifying and describing areas for vegetation conservation in Zimbabwe. In: Huntley B.J. (ed.), Botanical Diversity in Southern Africa. Strelitzia 1. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, South Africa, pp. 125-139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wester L. 1994. Weed management and the habitat protection of rare species: a case study of the endemic Hawaiian fern Marsilea villosa. Biological Conservation 68: 1-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westfall R.H., Van Staden J.M., Panagos M.D., Breytenbach P.J.J. and Greeff A. 1996. Scale-Related Vegetation Sampling. Agricultural Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills R.T. 1993. The ecological impact of Phytophthora cinnamomi in the Stirling Range National Park, Western Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology 18: 145-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkowski E.T.F., Knowles L. and Liston R.J. 1997. Threatened plants in the Northern Province of South Africa: case studies and future approaches. In: Hale P. (ed.), Conservation Outside Nature Reserves. Surrey Beatty, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 446-451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkowski E.T.F., Lamont B.B. and Obbens F.J. 1994. Commercial picking of Banksia hookeriana in the wild reduces subsequent shoot, flower and seed production. Journal of Applied Ecology 31: 508-520.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gauteng Directorate of Nature Conservation, Johannesburg, South Africa

    M.F. Pfab

Authors
  1. M.F. Pfab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pfab, M. An integrative approach for the conservation and management of South Africa's floristic diversity at the provincial level. Biodiversity and Conservation 11, 1195–1204 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016045420951

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016045420951

Search

Navigation