Skip to main content
Log in

The Representation of the Shoah in Maus: History as Psychology

  • Published:
Res Publica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The contemporary tendency in United States culture to substitute a discourse of psychology for political and social analysis is especially evident in treatments of the Shoah. Drawing on postmodernist techniques, Art Spiegelman's“Holocaust commix”, Maus, dramatizes not historical reality but the effort of representing the memory of trauma. In the absence of symbolic authority, suffering from rivalry with his father and haunted by the real of the father's voice, the son becomes the subject of the narration. Like Maus, the Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C. and the criticism of Dominick LaCapra focus on the psychological processes of the private individual.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thormann, J. The Representation of the Shoah in Maus: History as Psychology. Res Publica 8, 123–139 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016044401839

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016044401839

Navigation