Skip to main content
Log in

The Effect of Single and Dual Sales Targets on Sales Call Selection: Quota versus Quota and Bonus Plan

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ross (1991) demonstrated that a salesperson's quota acts as a reference point (target or goal) and influences sales call selection. Ross, however, focused only on the effect of a single reference point. The use of multiple goals is quite common in the sales environment, for example in the quota plus bonus compensation structure and in the use of incentive plans. Our study compares and contrasts call selection when a single goal (quota) is given versus when dual targets are assigned (a quota plus bonus level). Consistent with our hypotheses, we find that call selection patterns are influenced by the number of targets assigned to the salesperson.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Erez, Miriam and Frederick H. Kanfer. (1983). ''The Role of Goal Acceptance in Goal Setting and Task Performance,'' Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 454–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erez, Miriam and Isaac Zidon. (1984). ''Effect of Goal Acceptance on the Relationship of Goal Difficulty to Performance,'' Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, Norman T. (1982a). ''Actions in Relation to Expected Consequences: An Overview of a Research Program,'' in Norman T. Feather (ed.), Expectations and Actions: Expectancy-Value Models in Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 53–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, Norman T. (1982b). ''Expectancy-value approaches: Present Status and Future Directions,'' in Expectations and Actions: Expectancy-Value Models in Psychology. Editor, Norman T. Feather, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Futrell, Charles M. (1999). Fundamentals of Selling: Customers For Life, 6th ed., Boston, MS, Irwin McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, Howard. (1982). ''Goal Levels and Task Performance: A Compelling Replication of some Compelling Results,'' Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 245–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, Kissan, and Manohar U. Kalwani. (1998). ''The Role of Bonus Pay in Salesforce Compensation Plans,'' Industrial Marketing Management, 27, 147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. (1979). ''Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk,'' Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, Gary P., and Gary A. Yukl. (1975). ''A Review of Research on the Application of Goal Setting in Organizations,'' Academy of Management Journal, 18(4), 824–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughhunn, Dan J., John W. Payne, and Roy Crum. (1980). ''Managerial Risk Preferences for Below Target Returns,'' Management Science, 26, 1238–1249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, Kurt, Tamara Dembo, Leon Festinger, and Pauline S. Sears. (1944). ''Level of Aspiration,'' in Personality and the Behavior Disorders, Vol. 1, Editor, J. Hunt, NY: The Ronald Press Co. 333–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, Lola L. (1987). ''Between Hope and Fear: The Psychology of Risk,'' in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Editor, Leonard Berkowitz, San Diego, CA: Academy Press Inc. 20, 255–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A. (1968). ''Toward a Theory of Task Motivation and Incentive,'' Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3, 157–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., and Gary P. Latham. (1984). Goal Setting: A Motivational Technique that Works! Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., and Gary P. Latham. (1990). A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCrimmon, Kenneth R., and Donald A. Wehrung. (1986). Taking Risks: The Management of Uncertainty. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James G. (1988). ''Variable risk preferences and adaptive aspirations,'' Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 9(1), 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James G., and Zur Shapira. (1987). ''Managerial Perspectives on Risk and Risk Taking,'' Management Science, 33, 1404–1417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, Michele. (1996). ''Global Gamble,'' Sales & Marketing Management, 148(7), (July), 64–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowen, John C. and Greg W. Marshall. (1992). ''The Effects of Gain/Loss Frames on Product Management Risk-Taking: A Replication and Extension,'' American Marketing Association Winter Educators' Conference Proceedings, 3, 189–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowen, John C., R. Dennis Middlemist, and David Luther. (1981). ''Joint Effects of Assigned Goal Level and Incentive Structure on Task Performance: A Laboratory Study,'' Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(5), 598–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, James C., and Daniel R. Ilgen. (1984). ''Goal Setting: A theoretical analysis of a motivational technology,'' in Research in Organizational Behavior, Editors, B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings, JAI, Greenwich: CT, 6, 95–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, John W., Dan J. Laughhunn, and Roy Crum. (1980). ''Translation of Gambles and Aspiration Level Effects in Risky Choice Behavior,'' Management Science, 26(10), 1039–1060.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, John W., Dan J. Laughhunn, and Roy Crum. (1981). ''Further Tests of Aspiration Level Effects in Risky Choice Behavior,'' Management Science, 27(8), 953–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmusson, Erika. (1997). This is Not an Incentive,'' Sales & Marketing Management, 149(11), (October), 123–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, William T. Jr. (1991). ''Performance Against Quota and the Call Selection Decision,'' Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (August), 296–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoemaker, Paul J. H. (1982). ''The Expected Utility Model: It's Variants, Purposes, Evidence, and Limitations,'' Journal of Economic Literature, 20, 529–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, Sidney. (1957). ''Level of aspiration and decision making,'' Psychological Review, 64(4), 253–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, Richard and Eric Johnson (1990). ''Gambling With the House Money and Trying to Break Even: The Effect of Prior Outcomes on Risky Choice,'' Management Science, 36(6), 643–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, Victor H. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mcfarland, R.G., Challagalla, G.N. & Zenor, M.J. The Effect of Single and Dual Sales Targets on Sales Call Selection: Quota versus Quota and Bonus Plan. Marketing Letters 13, 107–120 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016041802460

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016041802460

Navigation