Abstract
This article emphasizes the importance of formative assessment in the teaching and learning process and the role technology can play in advancing assessment practices. It describes work undertaken by attendees of the CILT workshop, highlighting key issues that were discussed and areas for further development including how to address important equity concerns.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
REFERENCES
Baker, E. (1998). Understanding Educational Quality: Where Validity Meets Technology (William H. Angoff Memorial Lecture Series), Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ. Retrieved from <http://www.ets.org/research/pic/angoff5>
Bauer,M. (2000). Demonstration of a scaffolded learning environment developed for AP Statistics. Electronic demonstration at CILT2000, Assessment Breakout session.Washington, DC.
Becker, H., Ravitz, J., and Wong, Y. (1999). Teacher and Teacher-Directed Student Use of Computers and Software (Report #3. Teaching, Learning and Computing: 1998), Center for Research in Information Technology in Organizations, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA. Retrieved from <http://www.crito.uci.edu/TLC>
Black, P., and William, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box. Phi Delta Kappan, pp. 139-148. Retrieved Oct. 1998 from http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/kbla9810,htm CEO Forum School Technology and Readiness Report (2001). Year 4. The CEO forum report on education and technology. Retrieved June 2001 from http:// 206.61.101.89/downloads/report4.pdf
Culp, K., Honey, M., and Spielvogel, R. (2000). Local relevance and generalizability: Linking evaluation to school improvement. In Haertel, G., and Means, B. (Eds.), Stronger Designs for Research on Educational Uses of Technology: Conclusions and Implications, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA. Retrieved from http://www.sri.com/policy/designkt/ found.html
Duschl, R. A., and Ellenbogen, K. (2001). Making explicit what we know and how we know. Nurturing and assessing epistemic reasoning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle,WA, April 2001.
Haertel, G., and Means, B. (2000). Stronger Designs for Research on Educational Uses of Technology: Conclusions and Implications, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA. Retrieved from http://www.sri.com/policy/designkt/found.html
Hickey,D.T. (2001). Dimensions of collaboration and participation. Grant from the Center for Interactive Learning Technology's Seed Grant Program.
Irvin, K. (2000). Assessment of metacognitive skill within a scaffolded learning environment. Electronic demonstration at CILT2000, Assessment Breakout session,Washington, DC.
Means, B., Penuel, B., and Quellmalz, E. (2000). Developing Assessments for Tomorrow's Classrooms (Secretary's Conference on Educational Technology), U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/Technology/techconf/2000/means paper.html
Minstrell, J. (2000). CILT Synergy Project: Applying the theory of “Knowledge Facets” and the Diagnoser Software to issues of understanding water quality from the perspective of ecosystems. In Bransford, J. (chair), CILT Spotlight Symposium: Successful Collaborations and Their Benefits for the Field. Symposium for The Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April 2000. Retrieved April 2000 from <http://cilt.berkeley.edu/aera/aera00spotlight.html>
Quellmalz, E., Penuel, B., and Zalles, D. (2000). Building a foundation for educational technology research: Prototype assessment development. In Haertel, G., and Means, B. (Eds.), Stronger Designs for Research on Educational Uses of Technology: Conclusions and Implications, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA. Retrieved from <http://www.sri.com/policy/designkt/found.html>
Quellmalz, E., and Schank, P. (1998). Performance assessment links in science (PALS): On-line, interactive resources. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Diego, CA, April 1998. Retrieved from <http://www.pals.sri.com/papers/aera98/index.html>
Roschelle, J., and Pea, R. D. (1999). Trajectories from today's WWW to a powerful educational infrastructure. Educational Researcher 8: 22-25.
Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills (SCANS) (1991). What Work Requires of Schools: A SCANS Report for America 2000, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC.
Stiggins, R. (1997). Student-Centered Classroom Assessment, 2nd ed., Merril, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Tanimoto, S. (2000). Supporting assessment-intensive pedagogy: The design of INFACT-the interactive networked facet-based assessment capture tool. Presentation at CILT2000 Annual Conference, Assessment Breakout Sessions, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://kn.cilt.org/cilt2000/abstracts/2101.html
Trilling, B., and Hood, P. (1999). Learning, technology, and education reform in the knowledge age or “we're wired, webbed, and windowed, now what?” Educational Technology 39: 5-18.
Yarnall, L., Penuel, W., Ravitz, J., Murray, G., and Broom, M. (2001). Portable assessment authoring: Using handheld technology to assess collaborative inquiry. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, Seattle,WA, April 2001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ravitz, J. CILT2000: Using Technology to Support Ongoing Formative Assessment in the Classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology 11, 293–296 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016032821506
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016032821506