Skip to main content
Log in

In-Vitro Dissolution Profile Comparison: Statistics and Analysis, Model Dependent Approach

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. To develop and propose a ‘model dependent’ approach for the in-vitro dissolution profiles comparison.

Methods. Diltiazem hydrochloride tablet dissolution profiles were compared using a statistical approach based on a mathematical model. A similarity region (SR) was defined based on the intra- and inter-lot parameter variances of the final production size standard lots. Statistical distances between the test and reference lot parameter means were computed and normalized. A 90% confidence region (CR) was developed around the statistical distance. The confidence region was compared with the similarity region to assess the similarity or dis-similarity of the test and reference (REF) lot dissolution profiles. Two test lots, one with a ‘minor’ modification (mm) the other with a ‘major’ modification (MM), were evaluated.

Results. ‘Weibull’ was selected as the ‘model’ function. A comparison of the confidence regions around the statistical distance of ‘mm-REF’ and ‘MM-REF’ with the similarity region, suggested that the dissolution profiles of the ‘minor’ modification lot were similar and that of ‘major’ modification lot were dis-similar to the reference lot.

Conclusions. A ‘model dependent’ approach was shown to be useful for the inter-lot in-vitro dissolution profiles comparison.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. U.S. Pharmacopeia 23 and National Formulary 18, 1791, 1995.

  2. J. W. Moore and H. H. Flanner. Pharmaceutical Research 11:S-171 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Rescigno. Pharmaceutical Research 9/7:925–928 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. W. Moore and H. H. Flanner. Pharmaceutical Technology 20(6):64–74 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Tsong, P. M. Sathe, T. Hammerstrom and V. P. Shah. Statistical assessment of mean differences between two dissolution data sets. submitted to Drug Information Journal. (1996).

  6. L. Kervin, and J. Yuruusi. Int. J. Pharm. 92:115–122 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. Akaike. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 19:716–723 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. A. Johnson and D. W. Wichern, Applied Multivariate Analysis, Prentice-Hall Inc, New Jersey, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sathe, P.M., Tsong, Y. & Shah, V.P. In-Vitro Dissolution Profile Comparison: Statistics and Analysis, Model Dependent Approach. Pharm Res 13, 1799–1803 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016020822093

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016020822093

Navigation