# Polarizable-Vacuum (PV) Approach to General Relativity

- 186 Downloads
- 26 Citations

## Abstract

Standard pedagogy treats topics in general relativity (GR) in terms of tensor formulations in curved space-time. An alternative approach based on treating the vacuum as a polarizable medium is presented here. The polarizable vacuum (PV) approach to GR, derived from a model by Dicke and related to the “TH*εμ*” formalism used in comparative studies of gravitational theories, provides additional insight into what is meant by a curved metric. While reproducing the results predicted by GR for standard (weak-field) astrophysical conditions, for strong fields a divergence of predictions in the two formalisms (GR vs. PV) provides fertile ground for both laboratory and astrophysical tests to compare the two approaches.

## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## REFERENCES

- 1.C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler,
*Gravitation*(Freeman, San Francisco, 1973), p. 5.Google Scholar - 2.H. A. Wilson, “An electromagnetic theory of gravitation,”
*Phys. Rev.***17**, 54–59 (1921).Google Scholar - 3.R. H. Dicke, “Gravitation without a principle of equivalence,”
*Rev. Mod. Phys.***29**, 363–376 (1957). See also R. H. Dicke, “Mach's principle and equivalence,” in*Proc. of the Intern'l School of Physics “Enrico Fermi” Course XX, Evidence for Gravitational Theories*, C. Møller, ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1961), pp. 1–49.Google Scholar - 4.A. P. Lightman and D. L. Lee, “Restricted proof that the weak equivalence principle implies the Einstein equivalence principle,”
*Phys. Rev. D***8**, 364–376 (1973).Google Scholar - 5.C. M. Will, “Gravitational red-shift measurements as tests of nonmetric theories of gravity,”
*Phys. Rev. D***10**, 2330–2337 (1974).Google Scholar - 6.M. P. Haugan and C. M. Will, “Principles of equivalence, Eötvös experiments, and gravitational red-shift experiments: The free fall of electromagnetic systems to postpost-Coulombian order,”
*Phys. Rev. D***15**, 2711–2720 (1977).Google Scholar - 7.C. M. Will,
*Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics, Revised Edition*(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993), Sec. 2.6.Google Scholar - 8.A. M. Volkov, A. A. Izmest'ev, and G. V. Skrotskii, “The propagation of electromagnetic waves in a Riemannian space,”
*Sov. Phys. JETP***32**, 686–689 (1971).Google Scholar - 9.W. Heitler,
*The Quantum Theory of Radiation*, 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press, London, 1954), p. 113.Google Scholar - 10.R. A. Alpher, “Large numbers, cosmology, and Gamow,”
*Am. Sci.***61**, 52–58 (Jan.–Feb. 1973).Google Scholar - 11.
- 12.J. K. Webb, V. V. Flambaum, C. W. Churchill, M. J. Drinkwater, and J. D. Barrow, “Search for time variation of the fine structure constant,”
*Phys. Rev. Lett.***82**, 884–887 (1999).Google Scholar - 13.J. W. Brault, “Gravitational redshift of solar lines,”
*Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc.***8**, 28 (1963).Google Scholar - 14.R. V. Pound and G. A. Rebka, “Apparent weight of photons,”
*Phys. Rev. Lett.***4**, 337–341 (1960).Google Scholar - 15.R. V. Pound and J. L. Snider, “Effect of gravity on nuclear resonance,”
*Phys. Rev. Lett.***13**, 539–540 (1965).Google Scholar - 16.H. Goldstein,
*Classical Mechanics*(Addison–Wesley, Reading, MA, 1957), pp. 206–207.Google Scholar - 17.Y. Mizobuchi, “New theory of space-time and gravitation–Yilmaz's approach,”
*Hadronic J.***8**, 193–219 (1985).Google Scholar - 18.C. O. Alley, “The Yilmaz theory of gravity and its compatibility with quantum theory,” in
*Fundamental Problems in Quantum Theory: A Conference Held in Honor of Professor John A. Wheeler*, D. M. Greenberger and A. Zeilinger, eds. (Vol. 755 of the Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, New York, 1995), pp. 464–475.Google Scholar - 19.G. Schilling, “Watching the universe's second biggest bang,”
*Science***283**, 2003–2004 (1999).Google Scholar - 20.S. L. Robertson, “Bigger bursts from merging neutron stars,”
*Astrophys. J.***517**, L117–L119 (1999).Google Scholar - 21.V. W. Hughes, H. G. Robinson, and V. Beltran-Lopez, “Upper limit for the anisotropy of inertial mass from nuclear resonance experiments,”
*Phys. Rev. Lett.***4**, 342–344 (1960).Google Scholar - 22.R. W. P. Drever, “A search for anisotropy of inertial mass using a free precession technique,”
*Phil. Mag.***6**, 683–687 (1961).Google Scholar - 23.R. Collela, A. W. Overhauser, and S. A. Werner, “Observation of gravitationally induced quantum interference,”
*Phys. Rev. Lett.***34**, 1472–1474 (1975).Google Scholar - 24.H. E. Puthoff, “SETI, the velocity-of-light limitation, and the Alcubierre warp drive: An integrating overview,”
*Phys. Essays***9**, 156–158 (1996).Google Scholar - 25.R. d'E. Atkinson, “General relativity in Euclidean terms,”
*Proc. Roy. Soc.***272**, 60–78 (1962).Google Scholar