Skip to main content
Log in

Surprising Constituents

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discusses the nature of apparently surprising phenomena found in Japanese. Two or more elements of a sentence, excluding the verb, can appear rather freely in the focus position of Japanese cleft constructions. These elements cannot possibly be considered to form a base-generated constituent and hence the existence of such "surprising constituents" poses an interesting problem for syntactic theory. It is shown that an approach that appeals to overt verb raising to account for surprising constituents is inadequate for a number of reasons. An alternative approach is proposed in which surprising constituents are formed by "oblique movement" (movement of an element to another element that does not dominate it). Consequences of this proposal are explored for related theoretical and empirical domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abe, Jun (1999) “On Directionality of Movement: A Case of Japanese Right Dislocation,” ms., Nagoya University.

  • Abe, Jun and Hiroto Hoshi (1997) “Gapping and P-stranding,” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6, 101–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akmajian, Adrian, Susan M. Steele and Thomas Wasow (1979) “The Category AUX in Universal Grammar,” Linguistic Inquiry 10, 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoyagi, Hiroshi (2000) “On Verbal Inflection in Japanese,” Paper presented at a symposium held during the Eighteenth National Conference of the English Linguistic Society of Japan.

  • Besten, Hans den and Gert Webelhuth (1987) “Adjunction and Remnant Topicalization in the Germanic SOV-Languages,” Paper presented at GLOW, Venice, 1987.

  • Besten, Hans den and Gert Webelhuth (1990) “Stranding,” in Günther Grewendorf and Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), Scrambling and Barriers, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Greg (1987) “Same and Different: Some Consequences for Syntax and Semantics,” Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 531–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (1993) “A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory,” in Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (1995) The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delahunty, Gerald P. (1981) Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of English Cleft Sentences, PhD dissertation, University of California, Irvine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, Molly (1997) “Yiddish VP Order and the Typology of Object Movement in Germanic,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15, 369–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emonds, Joseph (1976) A Transformational Approach to English Syntax: Root, Structure-Preserving, and Local Transformations, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiengo, Robert (1977) “On Trace Theory,” Linguistic Inquiry 8, 35–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukui, Naoki (1997) “Attract and the A-over-A Principle,” in UCI Working Papers in Linguistics 3, Irvine Linguistics Students Association, University of California, Irvine, pp. 51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukui, Naoki and Yuji Takano (1998) “Symmetry in Syntax: Merge and Demerge,” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7, 27–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewendorf, Günther (2001) “Multiple Wh-Fronting,” Linguistic Inquiry 32, 87–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider, Hubert (1990) “Topicalization and Other Puzzles of German Syntax,” in Günther Grewendorf and Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), Scrambling and Barriers, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoji, Hajime (1985) Logical Form Constraints and Configurational Structures in Japanese, PhD dissertation, University of Washington.

  • Hoji, Hajime (1987) “Japanese Clefts and Chain Binding/Reconstruction Effects,” Paper presented at WCCFL VI.

  • Johnson, Kyle (1996) “In Search of the English Middle Field,” ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamio, Akio and Margaret Thomas (1994) “Some Functional Constraints on Clefts with Multiple Foci,” Paper presented at a symposium held during the Twelfth National Conference of the English Linguistic Society.

  • Kayne, Richard (1994) The Antisymmetry of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kikuchi, Akira (1987) “Comparative Deletion in Japanese,” ms., Yamagata University.

  • Kim, Jeong-Seok (1998) “A Minimalist Theory of S-Structure Saving Effects in Japanese and Korean,” Proceedings of the Fourteenth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics'97, CLC Publications, Cornell University, pp. 82–93.

  • Kitahara, Hisatsugu (1997) Elementary Operations and Optimal Derivations, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koizumi, Masatoshi (2000) “String Vacuous Overt Verb Raising,” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9, 227–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuno, Susumu (1978) “Japanese: A Characteristic OV Language,” in W. Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic Typology, University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuwabara, Kazuki (1996) “Multiple Wh-phrases in Elliptical Clauses and Some Aspects of Clefts with Multiple Foci,” in Masatoshi Koizumi, Masayuki Oishi, and Uli Sauerland (eds.), Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics 2, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 29, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Richard (1988) “On the Double Object Construction,” Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, Howard and Mamoru Saito (1992) Move α, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, Anoop (1990) The A/A-bar Distinction and Movement Theory, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • May, Robert (1977) The Grammar of Quantification, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Müller, Gereon (1996) “A Constraint on Remnant Movement,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14, 355–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima, Heizo (1994) “Bunretubun-no Goyooteki Toogoteki Zyooken: Tazyuu Syootenbuno Tyuusin-ni Site [Pragmatic and Syntactic Conditions on Cleft Sentences: With Special Focus on Sentences with Multiple Foci],” Paper presented at a symposium held during the Twelfth National Conference of the English Linguistic Society.

  • Nemoto, Naoko (1993) Chains and Case Positions: A Study from Scrambling in Japanese, PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Oka, Toshifusa (1989) “On the SPEC of IP,” ms., MIT.

  • Reinhart, Tanya (1998) “Wh-In-Situ in the Framework of the Minimalist Program,” Natural Language Semantics 6, 29–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi (1994) “Argument/Adjunct (A)symmetries,” in G. Cinque, J. Koster, J.-Y. Pollock, L. Rizzi, and R. Zanuttini (eds.), Paths Towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne, Georgetown University Press, Washington D.C., pp. 367–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Ian (1998) “Have/Be Raising, Move F, and Procrastinate,” Linguistic Inquiry 29, 113–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, John Robert (1984) “Inner Islands,” Proceedings of the 10th Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society, 258–265.

  • Sabel, Joachim (2001) “Deriving Multiple Head and Phrasal Movement: The Cluster Hypothesis,” Linguistic Inquiry 32, 532–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, Mamoru (1985) Some Asymmetries in Japanese and Their Theoretical Implications, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Saito, Mamoru (1986) “Three Notes on Syntactic Movement in Japanese,” in Takashi Imai and Mamoru Saito (eds.), Issues in Japanese Linguistics, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 301–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, Mamoru (1989) “Scrambling as Semantically Vacuous A'-movement,” in Mark R. Baltin and Anthony S. Kroch (eds.), Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 182–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, Mamoru (1992) “Long Distance Scrambling in Japanese,” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1, 69–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, Mamoru (1994) “Additional-Wh Effects and the Adjunction Site Theory,” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 3, 195–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakai, Hiromu (1998) “Feature Checking and Morphological Merger,” in David J. Silva (ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics volume 8, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauerland, Uli (1999) “Erasability and Interpretation,” Syntax 2, 161–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohn, Keun-Won (1994) “Adjunction to Argument, Free Ride and a Minimalist Program,” in Masatoshi Koizumi and Hiroyuki Ura (eds.), Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics 1, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 24, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 315–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tada, Hiroaki (1990) “Scrambling(s),” Paper presented at the Ohio State Workshop on Japanese Syntax.

  • Tada, Hiroaki (1993) A/A-bar Partition in Derivation, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Takahashi, Daiko (1994) “Sluicing in Japanese,” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 3, 265–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takano, Yuji (1994) “Unbound Traces and Indeterminacy of Derivation,” in Masaru Nakamura (ed.), Current Topics in English and Japanese, Hituzi Syobo, Tokyo, pp. 229–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takano, Yuji (1996) Movement and Parametric Variation in Syntax, PhD dissertation, University of California, Irvine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takano, Yuji (1998) “Object Shift and Scrambling,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 817–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takano, Yuji (2000) “Illicit Remnant Movement: An Argument for Feature-Driven Movement,” Linguistic Inquiry 31, 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takano, Yuji (2002) “On Vacuous Verb Raising,” ms., Kinjo Gakuin University.

  • Tateishi, Koichi (1994) The Syntax of 'subjects', CSLI Publications and Kurosio Publishers, Stanford and Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiersch, Craig (1985) “VP and Scrambling in the German Mittelfeld,” ms., Tilburg University.

  • Tsai, Wei-Tien (1994) On Economizing the Theory of A'-Dependencies, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Watanabe, Akira (1992) “Subjacency and S-Structure Movement of Wh-In-Situ,” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1, 255–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, Akira (2000a) “Absorption: Interpretability and Feature Strength,” in Kazuko Inoue (ed.), Report (4), Researching and Verifying an Advanced Theory of Human Language: Explanation of the Human Faculty for Constructing and Computing Sentences on the Basis of Lexical Conceptual Features, Graduate School of Language Sciences, Kanda University of International Studies, Chiba, pp. 253–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, Akira (2000b) “Remarks on Head Movement within VP Shell,” in Mamoru Saito, Yasuaki Abe, Hiroshi Aoyagi, Masatake Arimoto, Keiko Murasugi, and Tatsuya Suzuki (eds.), Proceedings of the Nanzan GLOW, Nanzan University, Nagoya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoerner, Edward (1995) Coordination: The Syntax of &P, PhD dissertation, University of California, Irvine.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takano, Y. Surprising Constituents. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11, 243–301 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016011311546

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016011311546

Keywords

Navigation