Skip to main content

Genetic Analysis and Estimation of Genetic Diversity in East-European Breeds of Windhounds (Canis familiaris L.) Based on the Data of Genomic Studies Using RAPD Markers

Abstract

The method of polymerase chain reaction with a set of arbitrary primers (RAPD–PCR) was used to describe genetic variation and to estimate genetic diversity in East-European windhounds, Russian Borzoi and Russian Chortai. For comparison, windhounds of two West-European breeds (Whippet and Greyhound) and single dogs of other breed types (shepherd, terriers, mastiffs, and bird dogs) were examined. For all dog groups, their closest related species, the wolf Canis lupus, was used as an outgroup. Variation of RAPD markers was studied at several hierarchic levels: intra- and interfamily (for individual families of Russian Psovyi and Chortai windhounds), intra- and interbreed (for ten dog breeds), and interspecific (C. familiaris–C. lupus). In total, 57 dogs and 4 wolves were studied. Using RAPD–PCR with three primers, 93 DNA fragments with a length of 150–1500 bp were detected in several Windhound families with known filiation. These fragments were found to be inherited as dominant markers and to be applicable for estimation of genetic differences between parents and their offspring and for comparison of individuals and families with different level of inbreeding. A high level of intra- and interbreed diversity was found in Russian Borzoi and Russian Chortai. In these dogs, genetic similarity indices varied in a range of 72.2 to 93.4% (parents–offspring) and 68.0 to 94.5 (sibs). Based on the patterns of RAPD markers obtained using six primers, a dendrogram of genetic similarity between the wolf and different dog breeds was constructed, and indices of intragroup diversity were calculated. All studied breeds grouped into two clusters, windhounds (Borzoi-like dogs) and other dog breeds. Russian windhounds represent a very heterogeneous group, in which the Russian Borzoi is closer to Greyhound than the Russian Chortai. All studied wolves constituted a separate cluster. Significant differences were found between the wolf and dogs by the number of RAPD markers (92.8 and 86.1, respectively) and by the indices of genetic diversity (54.3 and 64.8%, respectively). The reason for the high intraspecific variation of dogs (including Russian windhounds) and the prospects of using the studied group of markers for genetic analysis and differentiation in C. familiaris are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.

    Graphodatsky, A.S., Zhelezova, A.I., Knyazev, S.P., et al.,Genetika sobaki (Genetics of the Dog), Novosi-birsk: Novosibirsk State Univ., 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Mellersh, C.S., Langston, A.A., Acland, G.M., et al., A Linkage Map of the Canine Genome, Genomics, 1997, vol. 46, pp. 326-336.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ostrander, E.A., Iong, P.M., Rine, I., and Duyk, D., Construction of Small-Insert Genomic DNA Libraries Highly Enriched for Microsatellite Repeat Sequences,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1992, vol. 89, pp. 3419-3423.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ivanov, S.V., Potapov, V.A., Filipenko, E.A., and Romashchenko, A.G., Heterogeneity of the Canidae Bsp-Repeats Family: Discovery of the EcoRI Subfamily, Genetika (Moscow), 1991, vol. 27, pp. 973-982.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Okumura, N., Ishiguro, N., Nakano, M., et al., Intra-and Interbreed Genetic Variations of Mitochondrial DNA Major Non-Coding Regions in Japanese Native Dog Breeds (Canis familiaris), Anim. Genet., 1996, vol. 27, pp. 397-405.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Savolainen, P., Arvestad, L., and Lundeberg, J., mtDNA Tandem Repeats in Domestic Dogs and Wolves: Mutation Mechanism Studied by Analysis of the Sequence of Imperfect Repeats, Mol. Biol. Evol., 2000, vol. 17, pp. 474-488.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Francisco, L.V., Langston, A.A., Mellers, C.S., et al., A Class of Highly Polymorphic Tetranucleotide Repeats for Canine for Canine Genetic Mapping, Mamm. Genome, 1996, vol. 7, pp. 359-362.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ostrander, E.A. and Giniger, E., Semper Fidelis: What Man's Best Friend Can Teach Us about Human Biology and Disease, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 1997, vol. 61, pp. 475-480.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Olivier, M., Meehl, M.A., and Lust, G., Random Ampli-fied Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Sequences as Markers for Canine Genetic Studies, J. Hered., 1999, vol. 90, pp. 78-82.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Rothuizen, J. and Van Wolferen, M., Randomly Ampli-fied DNA Polymorphisms in Dogs Are Reproducible and Display Mendelian Transmission, Anim. Genet., 1997, vol. 25, pp. 13-18.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wang, X., Miller, A.B., Lepine, A.I., et al., Analysis of Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) for Identifying Genetic Markers Associated with Canine Hip Dysplasia,J. Hered., 1999, vol. 90, pp. 99-103.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lorenz, K., Man Meets Dog, London: Methuen, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bogolyubskii, S.N., Proiskhozhdenie i preobrazovanie domashnikh zhivotnykh (The Origin and Transformation of Domestic Animals), Moscow: Sovetskaya Nauka, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sokolov, V.E., Shubkina, A.V., and Bukvareva, E.P.,Sobaki mira (Dogs of the World), Moscow: Astrel', 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Shubkina, A.V., Russian Barsoi in the Early Third Millenium, Okhota, 2001, nos. 3-4, pp. 54-60.

  16. 16.

    Shubkina, A.V., In the Shadow of the Barsoi, European Barsoi, 2001 (in press).

  17. 17.

    Sneath, P.H.A. and Sokal, R.R., Numerical Taxonomy, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Stephens, J.C., Gilbert, D.A., and Yuhki, N., Estimation of Heterozygosity for Single-Probe Multilocus DNA Fingerprints, Mol. Biol. Evol., 1992, vol.9, pp. 729-743.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Rohlf, F.Y., NTSYS-PC, Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, New York, 1993.

  20. 20.

    Rogstad, S.H. and Pelikan, S., GELSTATS: A Computer Program for Population Genetics Analyses Using VNTR Multilocus Probe Data,BioTechniques, 1996, vol. 21, pp. 1128-1131.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Good, P., Permutation Tests, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Riedy, M.F., Hamilton, W.J., and Aquadro, C.F., Excess of Nonparental Bands in Offspring from Known Primate Pedigrees Assayed Using RAPD PCR, Nucleic Acids Res., 1992, vol. 20, p. 918.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gu, W., Post, C.M., Aquirre, G.D., and Ray, K., Individual DNA Bands Obtained by RAPD Analysis of Canine Genomic DNA Often Contain Multiple DNA Sequences, J. Hered., 1999, vol. 30, pp. 96-98.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Simonsen, V., Electrophoretic Studies on Blood Proteins of Domestic Dogs and Other Canidae,Hereditas (Lund, Swed.), 1976, vol. 82, pp. 7-18.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Fredholm, M. and Wintero, A.K., Variation of Short Tandem Repeats within and between Species Belonging to the Canidae Family, Anim. Genet., 1995, vol. 6, pp. 11-18.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tsuda, K., Kikkawa, Y., Yonekawa, H., and Tanabe, Y., Extensive Interbreeding Occurred among Multiple Matriarchal Ancestors during the Domestication of Dogs: Evidence from Inter-and Intraspecies Polymorphisms in the D-Loop Region of Mitochondrial DNA between Dogs and Wolves, Genes Genet. Syst., 1997, vol. 72, pp. 229-238.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wayne, R.K. and Ostrander, E.A., Origin, Genetic Diversity and Genome Structure of the Domestic Dog, BioEssays, 1999, vol. 21, pp. 247-257.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Garcia-Moreno, J., Matocq, M.D., Roy, M.S., et al., Relationships and Genetic Purity of the Endangered Mexican Wolf Based on Analysis of Microsatellite Loci, Conserv. Biol., 1996, vol. 10, pp. 376-389.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Vila, C., Maldonado, J.E., and Wayne, R.K., Phylogenetic Relationships, Evolution and Genetic Diversity of the Domestic Dog,J. Hered., 1999, vol. 90, pp. 71-77.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Vila, C., Savolainen, P., Maldonado, J.E., et al., Multiple and Ancient Origins of the Domestic Dog, Science, 1997, vol. 276, pp. 1687-1689.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zajc, I., Mellers, C.S., and Sampson, J., Variability of Canine Microsatellites within and between Different Dog Breeds, Mamm. Genome, 1997, vol. 8, pp. 182-185.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Knyazev, S.P., Tikhonov, V.N., and Tanabe, Yu., Genetic Variation and Microevolution of the Domestic Dog Canis familiaris (Carnivora): Genetic Polymorphism and Heterozygosity at the Loci of Blood Protein Systems in Domestic Dog Populations Differing in Phylogeny, Zool. Zh., 1999, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 732-739.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Knyazev, S.P., Tikhonov, V.N., Tanabe, Yu., and Moro-zov, P.S., Formation of Genetic Polymorphism in Connection with Phylogeny and Microevolution of Domestic Dog Canis familiaris L., Genetika (Moscow), 1998, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 1528-1536.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Semyenova, S.K., Vasil'ev, V.A., Morozova, E.V., et al., DNA Fingerprinting and Genetic Diversity of European Bison Bison bonasus, American Bison Bison bison and Gray Ukrainian Cattle Bos taurus, Genetika (Moscow), 2000, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 1535-1545.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Semyenova, S.K., Illarionova, N.A., Vasil'ev, V.A. et al. Genetic Analysis and Estimation of Genetic Diversity in East-European Breeds of Windhounds (Canis familiaris L.) Based on the Data of Genomic Studies Using RAPD Markers. Russian Journal of Genetics 38, 704–713 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016004320484

Download citation

Keywords

  • Genetic Diversity
  • Genetic Similarity
  • Similarity Index
  • Intraspecific Variation
  • Hierarchic Level