Community Mental Health Journal

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 287–301 | Cite as

Some Recovery Processes in Mutual-Help Groups for Persons with Mental Illness; I: Qualitative Analysis of Program Materials and Testimonies

  • Patrick W. Corrigan
  • Joseph D. Calabrese
  • Sarah E. Diwan
  • Cornelius B. Keogh
  • Lorraine Keck
  • Carol Mussey

Abstract

Outcome research is beginning to suggest that mutual-help programs lead to significant improvements in the quality of life and related factors of members who have serious mental illness. This paper is the first in a series that examines recovery processes that may account for these positive outcomes. In Study 1, a content analysis was completed on one dimension of the written program for GROW, a mutual-help program with more than 40 years of experience. Thirteen reliable recovery processes emerged from this analysis; most prominent among these was to “be reasonable” and to “decentralize from self by participating in community.” In Study 2, the recovery processes that emerged from this analysis of one aspect of GROW's written program were applied to 22 written testimonies made by Growers. Results of this analysis again showed being reasonable and decentralizing from self by participating in community were essential processes in this mutual-help program. Analysis of the personal testimonies also showed accepting one's personal value as an important element in the GROW program.

mutual-help programs recovery processes International GROW Movement content analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beard, J. H., Propst, R. N., & Malamud, T. J. (1982). The Fountain House model of psychiatric rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 5, 47–53.Google Scholar
  2. Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., & Becker, D. R. (1998). The role of social functioning in vocational rehabilitation. In K. T. Mueser & N. Tarrier et al. (Eds), Handbook of social functioning in schizophrenia (pp. 372–390). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  3. Carpinello, S. E., Knight, E. L. & Janis, L. (1991). A Qualitative study of the perceptions of the meaning of self-help, self-help group processes and outcomes by self-help group leaders, members, and significant others. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  4. Chadwick, P. D. J., Birchwood, M., & Trower, P. (1996). Cognitive therapy for delusions, voices and paranoia. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  5. Chamberlin, J., Rogers, E. S., & Ellison, M. L. (1996). Self-help programs: A description of their characteristics and their members. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal., 19, 33–42.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.Google Scholar
  7. Corrigan, P. W., Faber, D., Rashid, F., & Leary, M. (1999). The construct validity of empowerment among consumers of mental health services. Schizophrenia Research, 38, 77–84.Google Scholar
  8. Corrigan, P. W. & Garman, A. N. (1997). Some considerations for research on consumer empowerment and psychosocial interventions. Psychiatric Services, 48, 347–352.Google Scholar
  9. Corrigan, P. W. & Penn, D. L. (1997). Disease and discrimination: Two paradigms and describe severe mental illness. Journal of Mental Health, 6, 355–366.Google Scholar
  10. Davidson, L., Chinman, M., Kloos, B., Weingarten, R., Stayner, D., & Tebes, J. K. (1999). Peer support among individuals with severe mental illness: A review of the evidence. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 165–187.Google Scholar
  11. Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Fairweather, G. W., Sanders, D. H., Maynard, H., & Cressler, D. L. (1969). Community life for the mentally ill: An alternative to institutional care. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
  13. Galanter, M. (1988). Zealous self-help groups as adjuncts to psychiatric treatment: A study of Recovery, Inc. 139th Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 1248–1253.Google Scholar
  14. GROW. (1982). The program of growth to maturity. Sydney Australia: GROW Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  16. Humphreys, K. & Rappaport, J. (1994). Researching self-help/mutual aid groups and organizations: Many roads, one journey. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 3, 217–231.Google Scholar
  17. Kaufmann, C. L., Schulberg, H. C., & Schooler, N. R. (1994). Self help group participation among people with severe mental illness. Prevention in Human Services, 11, 315–331.Google Scholar
  18. Kennedy, M. (1989). Psychiatric hospitalizations of GROWers. Paper presented at the 2nd biennial conference of Community Research and Action, East Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
  19. Kingree, J. B. & Ruback, R. B. (1994). Understanding self-help groups. In T. J. Powell (Ed.). Understanding the self-help organization: Framework and findings (pp. 272–292). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Kurtz, L. F. (1988). Mutual aid for affective disorders: The Manic Depressive and Depressive Association. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 58, 152–155.Google Scholar
  21. Lieberman, R. P. & Snowden, L. R. (1994). Problems in assessing prevalence and membership characteristics of self-help group participants. In T. J. Powell (Ed.), Understanding the selfhelp organization: Frameworks and findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Luke, D. A, Rappaport, J., & Seidman, E. (1991). Setting phenotypes in amutual help organization: Expanding behavior setting theory. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 147–167.Google Scholar
  23. Luke, D. A., Roberts, L., & Rappaport, J. (1994). Individual, group context, and individual-group fit predictors of self-help group attendance. In T. J. Powell (Ed.), Understanding the self-help organization: Frameworks and findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Maton, K. I. (1988). Social support, organizational characteristics, psychological well-being, and group appraisal in three self-help group populations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 53–77.Google Scholar
  25. Maton, K. I., Leventhal, G. S., Madara, E. J., & Julien, M. A. (1989). Factors affecting the birth and death of mutual help groups: The role of national affiliation, professional involvement, and member focal problem. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 739–756.Google Scholar
  26. McFadden, L., Seidman, E., & Rappaport, J. (1992). A comparison of espoused theories of self-and mutual help: Implications for mental health professionals. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 23, 515–520.Google Scholar
  27. Meissen, G. J. & Warren, M. L. (1994). The self-help clearinghouse: A new development in action research for community psychology. In T. J. Powell (Ed.), Understanding the self-help organization: Frameworks and findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Mowbray, C. T. & Tan, C. (1993). Consumer-operated drop-in centers: Evaluations of operations and impact. The Journal of Mental Health Administration, 20, 8–19.Google Scholar
  30. Mueser, K. T., Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., & Resnick, S. G. (1998). Models of community care for severe mental illness: A review of research on case management. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 24, 37–74.Google Scholar
  31. Raiff, N. R. (1982). Self-help participation and quality of life: A study of the staff of Recovery, Inc. Prevention in the Human Services, 1, 79–90.Google Scholar
  32. Raiff, N. R. (1984). Some health-related outcomes of self-help participation: Recovery, Inc. as a case example of a self-help organization in mental health. In A. Gartner & F. Riessman (Eds.), The self-help revolution (pp. 189–193). New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  33. Rappaport, J. (1990). Research methods and the empowerment social agenda. In P. Tolan & C. Keys, et al. (Eds), Researching community psychology: Issues of theory and methods (pp. 51–63). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  34. Rappaport, J. (1993). Narrative studies, personal stories, and identity transformation in the mutual help context. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 29, 239–256.Google Scholar
  35. Rappaport, J., Seidman, E., Paul, T. A., McFadden, L. S., Reischl, T. M., Roberts, L. J., Salem, D. A., Stein, C.H., & Zimmerman, M.A. (1985). Collaborative research with a self-help organization. Social Policy, 15, 12–24.Google Scholar
  36. Richards, L. (1999). Introducing NVivo: A workshop handbook.Google Scholar
  37. Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
  38. Rogers, E. S., Chamberlin, J., Ellison, M. L., & Crean, T. (1997). A consumer-constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 48, 1042–1047.Google Scholar
  39. Stein, L. I., & Test, M. A. (1980). Alternative to mental hospital treatment: I. Conceptual model, treatment program, and clinical evaluation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 392–397.Google Scholar
  40. van Uchelen, C. (1989). Healing and cognitive control in cross-cultural perspective. Paper presented at the second biennial conference for Community Psychology Research and Action, East Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
  41. Young, J. & Williams, C. L. (1988). Whom do mutual-help groups help? A typology of members. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 39, 1178–1182.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick W. Corrigan
    • 1
  • Joseph D. Calabrese
    • 1
  • Sarah E. Diwan
    • 1
  • Cornelius B. Keogh
    • 2
  • Lorraine Keck
    • 2
  • Carol Mussey
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Chicago Center for Psychiatric RehabilitationTinley Park
  2. 2.International GROW MovementUSA

Personalised recommendations