Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparison of the Cholinergic Activity of Selected H2-Antagonists and Sulfoxide Metabolites

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Famotidine and selected H2-antagonists were evaluated with respect to toxicity and selected pharmacological activities. When administered intraperitoneally to mice at a dose equivalent to 10 times their respective H2-antagonist ED50 values, no deaths were observed. Similarly, no alteration in brain ACh concentrations or overt pharmacological effects were noted. However, at 400 mg/kg, ranitidine produced 89% lethality, followed by cimetidine (11%) and famotidine. Only cimetidine and famotidine at this dose significantly elevated brain acetylcholine levels. These results do not correlate with the in vitro data, where ORF-17578 and ranitidine were the most potent entities with respect to acetylcholinesterase inhibition (∼1–2 × 10−6 M), followed by nizatidine > cimetidine > famotidine. The sulfoxide metabolites of ranitidine and cimetidine were approximately one-tenth as potent as their parent compounds with respect to inhibition of acetylcholinesterase. Direct muscarinic stimulation or potentiation of acetylcholine-induced contraction in ileal tissue was not observed for any of the H2-antagonists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. J. M. Thomas and G. Misiewicz. Clin. Gastroenterol. 13:501–541 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Bertaccini, G. Coruzzi, E. Poli, and M. Adams. Agents Actions 19:180–187 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. O. G. Kovacs, G. M. Van Deventer, V. Maxwell, B. Sytnik, and J. H. Walsh. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 22 (Suppl. 136):41–46 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. B. Katz, C. K. Scott, and D. A. Shriver. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 237:404–410 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. E. Hansen and S. Bertl. Arzneim. Forsch. 33:161–163 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Bertaccini and G. Coruzzi. Agents Actions 12:168–171 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. C. E. Gwee and L. S. Cheah. Life Sci. 39:383–388 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. F. Holdren and R. M. Hixson. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 68:1198–1201 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. B. Pendleton, P. G. Cook, A. Shepherd-Rose, and A. W. Mangel. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 233:64–69 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. L. Ellman, K. D. Courtney, V. Andres, Jr., and A. Featherstone. Biochem. Pharmacol. 7:88–95 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. W. Kosh and J. J. Freeman. Fed. Proc. 40:270 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  12. I. Kagevi and L. Wahlby. Lancet 1:164–165 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  13. I. Kagevi, E. Thorhallsson, and L. Wahlby. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 24:849–850 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Aono, M. Morika, K. Mizuda, H. Narusawa, and H. Uchino. Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi 81:1653 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. M. Mehta, D. D. Bhalara, and R. K. Goyal. Agents Actions 21:38–40 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. Re, M. L. Cingolani, C. Concettoni, and L. Rossini. Pharmacol. Res. Commun. 15:485–517 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Re and L. Rossini. Pharmacol. Res. Commun. 16:381–399 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. T. Brittain, D. Jack, and L. E. Martin. Lancet 1:418 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Glaxo Inc. Product Information No. 4000714.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kosh, J.W., Sowell, J.W. & Chapman, J.M. A Comparison of the Cholinergic Activity of Selected H2-Antagonists and Sulfoxide Metabolites. Pharm Res 6, 709–713 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015994607652

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015994607652

Navigation