Skip to main content
Log in

Potential Improvement in Shelf Life Using the Prodrug Approach. II. A Systematic Examination of Kinetic Requirements

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The utilization time (UT) for a solution of a prodrug that is rapidly and completely converted to drug in the blood may be longer than the time for 10% loss of the initial concentration. The UT for an intravenous prodrug solution is the period during which the total prodrug and drug concentration exceeds 90% of the initial concentration. The influence of the rate of prodrug degradation (k nc), its conversion (k c) to drug, and the subsequent drug degradation (k h) on the UT of a stored solution was examined by simulating the prodrug and drug concentration–time courses. The ratio of the shelf life of a prodrug solution to that of the parent drug (UTratio) was calculated using a wide range of values for the three rate constants. Three-dimensional plots relating the UTratio to the k c, k nc, and k h values provide a basis for making a priori assessments of kinetic requirements for designing a prodrug to increase storage time. A parenteral prodrug intended to increase storage time may have a larger overall rate of loss than the parent drug, but it must have a smaller degradation rate (k nc < k h) to be successful. The UT for an oral prodrug solution depends upon the bioavailability of the prodrug relative to the drug in addition to the values for knc, k c, and k h. Two ampicillin prodrugs were used as models to calculate actual UTratio versus pH profiles. Intravenous solutions showed modest gains in the UTratio in the acid region, whereas oral solutions reached a UTratio as high as 22 by combining favorable rate constants with increased bioavailability. These actual UTratio versus pH profiles were interpreted in terms of the theory established using the simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. R. E. Notari. Biopharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 4th ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, 1987, pp. 316–338.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. E. Notari. In M. Rowland and G. Tucker (ed.), Pharmacokinetic Theory and Methodology, Pergamon Press, New York, 1986, pp. 281–309.

    Google Scholar 

  3. N.-A. T. Nguyen, L. M. Ali, and R. E. Notari. Pharm. Res. 5:288–296 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. I. Page. Acc. Chem. Res. 17:144–151 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Proctor, N. P. Gensmantel, and M. I. Page. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. II:1185–1192 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Tsuji, E. Miyamoto, T. Terasaki, and T. Yamana. J. Pharm. Sci. 68:1259–1263 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. A. Connors, G. L. Amidon, and V. J. Stella (eds.). Chemical Stability of Pharmaceuticals, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1986, pp. 41–62, 163–714.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. P. Clayton, M. Cole, S. W. Elson, and H. Ferres. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 5:670–671 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Shiobara, A. Tachibana, H. Sasaki, T. Wantanabe, and T. Sado. J. Antibiot. 27(9):665–673 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. O. Bodin, B. Ekstrom, U. Forsgren, L. P. Jalar, L. Magni, C. H. Ramsey, and B. Sjoberg. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 8:518–525 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Bergan. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 13:971–976 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Sjovall, L. Magni, and T. Beran. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 13:90–96 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nguyen, NA.T., Notari, R.E. Potential Improvement in Shelf Life Using the Prodrug Approach. II. A Systematic Examination of Kinetic Requirements. Pharm Res 5, 634–638 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015970819773

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015970819773

Navigation