Skip to main content
Log in

The Stability and Solubility of Progabide and Its Related Metabolic Derivatives

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stability–pH profile of the γ-aminobutyric acid prodrug, Progabide, was found to be bell shaped, with maximum stability occurring at pH 6 to 7 with a t 1/2 of 126 min. Of its metabolic derivatives, the deamidated product PGA degraded in a similar fashion to Progabide, whereas the hydrolytic degradation product SL79.182 was, as expected, a stable compound. Progabide behaved as a typical weak base, with its solubility increasing with a decrease in pH. SL79.182 behaved as a typical phenolic weak acid, with its solubility increasing with an increase in pH. Both compounds displayed low intrinsic solubilities of 14.5 × 10−5 M for Progabide and 33.4 × 10−6 M for SL79.182. An increase in temperature resulted in an increase in the solubility but a decrease in the stability of Progabide. The data obtained indicate that the gastric pH and gastric emptying rate will have a profound effect on the oral bioavailability of Progabide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. A. Sinkula. In E. B. Roche (ed.), Design of Biopharmaceutical Properties Through Prodrugs and Analogs, American Pharmeutical Association, Washington, D.C., 1977, pp. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Bartholini, B. Scatton, B. Zivkovic, and K. G. Lloyd. In P. Krogsgaard-Larsen, J. Scheel-Krager, and H. Kofod (eds.), GABA-Neurotransmitters, Munksgaard, Copenhagen, 1979, pp. 326–339.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. P. Kaplan, B. M. Raizon, M. Desarmenien, P. Feltz, P. M. Headley, P. Worms, K. G. Lloyd, and G. Bartholini. J. Med. Chem. 23:702–704 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. F. Farraj, S. S. Davis, G. D. Parr, and H. N. E. Stevens. Pharm. Res. 4:28–32 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. F. Farraj, S. S. Davis, G. D. Parr, and H. N. E. Stevens. Submitted for publication (1987).

  6. R. M. C. Dawson, D. C. Elliott, W. H. Elliott, and K. M. Jones. Data for Biochemical Research, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986, pp. 417–448.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Maupas, S. Letellier, M. B. Fleury, and B. Mompon. Analysis 12:122–128 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. G. Pope. Drug Cosmet. Ind. 127:48–66, 110–116 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. Ferrandes, A. Durand, P. Padovani, J. T. Burke, D. Garrigou, J. Fraisse-Andre, P. Hermann, and J. Allen. In G. Bartholini, L. Bossi, K. G. Lloyd, and P. L. Morselli (eds.), Epilepsy and GABA Receptor Agonists, L.E.R.S. Monograph Series, Vol. 3, Raven Press, New York, 1985, pp. 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. F. Farraj, S. S. Davis, G. D. Parr, and H. N. E. Stevens. Int. J. Pharm., in press (1988).

  11. S. Miyazaki, H. Inoue, T. Nadai, T. Arita, and M. Nakano. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 27, 1441:1447 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Z. T. Chowhan. J. Pharm. Sci. 67:1257–1260 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. A. Krebs and J. C. Speakman. J. Chem. Soc. 593–595 (1945).

  14. S. Niazi. Textbook of Biopharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. E. Ballard. J. Pharm. Sci. 63:1345–1358 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. A. Lauffer. Entropy Driven Processes in Biology, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  17. K. Embil and G. Torosian. J. Pharm. Sci. 71:191–193 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farraj, N.F., Davis, S.S., Parr, G.D. et al. The Stability and Solubility of Progabide and Its Related Metabolic Derivatives. Pharm Res 5, 226–231 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015941729400

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015941729400

Navigation