Skip to main content
Log in

An In Vitro Model to Evaluate Muscle Damage Following Intramuscular Injections

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An isolated rat muscle preparation was developed to screen for muscle damage (myotoxic potential) following intramuscular injections. Myotoxicity is evaluated by the total cumulative efflux of the enzyme creatine kinase from the extensor digitorum longus muscle into the incubation medium over a 2-hr period or by the slope of the cumulative creatine kinase efflux curve. The system allows for rapid screening of compounds and/or formulations regarding their myotoxic potential and is not sensitive to fluctuations of in vivo creatine kinase levels caused by animal handling or patient conditions. A good rank-order correlation was obtained between this in vitro technique and the in vivo myotoxicity of a number of pharmaceutical formulations, as indicated by circulating creatine kinase levels and histological observations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. D. J. Greenblatt and M. D. Allen. JAMA 240:542–544 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. R. Alper. Arch. Intern. Med. 138:1705–1710 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  3. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey—1975, National Center for Health Statistics, Rockville, Md. (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Bais and J. B. Edwards. CRC Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 16:291–335 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Cacace. N. Engl. J. Med. 287:309–310 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. E. Andersen and T. Damsgaard. Acta Med. Scand. 199:317–319 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. K. Knirsch and E. J. Gralla. N. Engl. J. Med. 282:1081–1082 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. C. Zener and D. C. Harrison. Arch. Intern. Med. 134:48–49 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Y. Meltzer, S. Mrozak, and M. Boyer. Am. J. Med. Sci. 259:42–48 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. Korttila, A. Sothman, and P. Andersson. Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol. 39:104–117 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. G. Warnock and G. L. Ellman. Science 164:276 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. M. Attar and C. Mata. Med. Ann. D.C. 40:92–93 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. Diness. Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol. 56:410–415 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Steiness, O. Svendsen, and F. Rasmussen. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 16:430–434 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. Steiness, F. Rasmussen, O. Svendsen, and P. Nielsen. Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol. 42:357–364 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  16. O. Svendsen, F. Rasmussen, P. Nielsen, and E. Steiness. Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol. 44:324–328 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Surber and H. Sucker. Pharm. Res. 4:490–494 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  18. O. Svendsen, F. Hojelse, and R. E. Bagdon. Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol. 56:183–190 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. D. Williams, B. G. Masters, L. D. Evans, D. A. Laska, and G. H. Hottendorf. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 9:10–17 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Oshida, K. Degawa, Y. Takahasi, and S. Akaishi. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 127:301–316 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. E. Gray, R. N. Weaver, J. Moran, and E. S. Feenstra. Toxicol. Appl. Pharm. 27:308–321 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  22. F. R. Sidell, D. L. Culver, and A. Kaminskis. JAMA 229:1894–1897 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. Hsu and J. Wantanabe. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 31:626–631 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  24. K. W. Reed and S. H. Yalkowsky. J. Parent. Sci. Tech. 39:64–68 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Dempsey, J. Morgan, and L. Cohen. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 18:104–111 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  26. K. E. Avis. In A. F. Gennaro (ed.), Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 17th ed., Mack, Easton, Pa., 1985, p. 1522.

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. E. Paget and H. McG. Scott. Br. J. Pharmacol. 12:427–433 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  28. H. O. Gloor, C. Vorburger, and J. Schadelin. Schweiz. Med. Wschr. 107:948–952 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  29. D. J. Greenblatt, D. W. Duhme, and J. Koch-Weser. N. Engl. J. Med. 288:689 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  30. I. Kronborg, D. Hunt, and A. J. Goble. Med. J. Aust. 1:635 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. J. Wilensky and J. A. Lowden. Neurology 23:318–324 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brazeau, G.A., Fung, HL. An In Vitro Model to Evaluate Muscle Damage Following Intramuscular Injections. Pharm Res 6, 167–170 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015940811827

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015940811827

Navigation