Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Indomethacin Amphoteric Gel on Gastric Ulcerogenicity and Absorption of Indomethacin in Rats

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Indomethacin is a potent and efficacious antiinflammatory agent. However, a limiting side effect is its ability to cause gastric ulceration. This study was designed to investigate the effects of an amphoteric gel on the gastric ulcerogenicity and pharmacokinetics of indomethacin. Oral administration (5 mg/kg) in a suspension and a gel formulation were compared to an intravenous (iv) formulation of indomethacin in rats. The iv formulation administered to rats produced large severe ulcers in some rats but not in others. In contrast, the oral suspension produced small ulcers in all rats. The difference in toxicities is attributed to a centrally mediated action as a result of high plasma levels of indomethacin following iv administration, compared to locally mediated action with the suspension, resulting from local high concentrations of indomethacin on the apical epithelial surface because of the presence of indomethacin crystals. Oral administration of the gel formulation did not result in any gastric ulceration and improved the bioavailability of indomethacin to 115.5%, compared with 68.2% for the suspension. The reduced gastrointestinal toxicity of indomethacin in the gel was attributed to the gel's ability to dissolve indomethacin, preventing the localized high concentration observed with the suspension and possibly providing a gastric protectant phospholipid. The gel formulation doubled the oral bioavailability and the t max of indomethacin compared to the suspension but did not affect the half-life. The results indicate that the local irritant effect of indomethacin, in rats, can be reduced by appropriate formulation design and suggest that the ulcerogenicity index for indomethacin can be improved by the use of an amphoteric gel formulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. J. E. F. Reynolds (ed.). Martindale The Extra Pharmacopeia 28th Edition, Pharmaceutical Press, London, 1982, pp. 257–261.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. A. Shriver, C. B. White, A. Sandor, and M. E. Rosenthale. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 32:73–83 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. T. Hitchens, S. Goldstein, A. Sambuca, and I. Shemano. Pharmacologist 9:242 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. Cioli, S. Putzolu, V. Rossi, P. Scorza Barcellona, and C. Corradino. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 50:283–289 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. D. Rainsford. Int. J. Tissue React. 8:1–14 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. M. Peskar, H. Weiler, Ch. Meyer. In K. D. Rainsford and G. P. Velo (eds.), Side Effects of Antiinflammatory/Analgesic Drugs, Raven Press, New York, 1984, pp. 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. D. Rainsford. In K. D. Rainsford and G. P. Velo (eds.), Side Effects of Antiinflammatory/Analgesic Drugs, Raven Press, New York, 1984, pp. 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. D. Rainsford and M. W. Whitehouse. Biochem. Pharmacol. 29:1281–1289 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. D. Rainsford. Biochem. Pharmacol. 27:877–885 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. D. Rainsford. In C. J. Pfeiffer (ed.), Drugs and Peptic Ulcer Disease, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 1982, pp. 227–236.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. P. Terweij-Groen, S. Heemstra, and J. C. Kraak. J. Chromatogr. Biomed. Appl. 181:385–397 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. B. Waynforth. Experimental and Surgical Technique in the Rat, Academic Press, London, 1980, pp. 50–52.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Alvan, M. Orme, L. Bertilsson, R. Ekstrand, and L. Palmer. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 18:364–373 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. Aoyagi, H. Ogata, N. Kaniwa, A. Ejima, H. Nakata, J. Tstusumi, T. Fujita, and I. Amada. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. Toxicol. 23:578–584 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  15. T. Yamamoto, M. Yamamoto, H. Nakae, K. Takada, S. Asada, T. Yokoyama, and K. Kuroda. Yakugaku Zasshi 102:196–201 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Bechgard, R. R. Brodie, L. F. Chasseaud, P. Houmoller, J. O. Hunter, P. Siklos, and T. Taylor. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 21:511–515 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. E. Hilton and M. P. Summers. Int. J. Pharm. 32:13–19 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. L. Ford. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 11:537–549 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Guslandi. Clin. Phys. B 5:57–60 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  20. L. M. Lichtenberger, L. A. Graziani, E. J. Dial, and D. A. Butler. Science 219:1327–1329 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liversidge, G.G., Dent, J. & Eickhoff, W.M. Influence of Indomethacin Amphoteric Gel on Gastric Ulcerogenicity and Absorption of Indomethacin in Rats. Pharm Res 6, 44–48 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015895501832

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015895501832

Navigation