Validation of Bioanalytical Methods

Abstract

Validation of bioanalytical methods used to generate data for pharmacokinetic and bioavailability studies is approached by a variety of techniques and is subject to many different methods of interpretation. This Review puts the various techniques into perspective and discusses pitfalls which may occur in interpretation of validation data. Recovery studies, standardization techniques, and selectivity/specificity are discussed with regard to the intrinsic value of various techniques that are used in validation. Models used for analytical calibration curves are explained in terms of their validity and limitations, along with a presentation of the most common ways to validate the model. Analytical sensitivity and detection limits are presented and discussed with regard to the usefulness of the various definitions. Appropriate means of testing precision and accuracy, the most important factors in assessing method quality, are presented. Stability and ruggedness testing are discussed along with a presentation of ways to assess data acceptability on a daily run basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.

    V. P. Shah. Analytical methods used in bioavailability studies: A regulatory viewpoint. Clin. Res. Pract. Drug Reg. Affairs 5:51–60 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    J. K. Taylor. Quality Assurance of Chemical Measurements, Lewis, Chelsea, Mich., 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    R. V. Smith and J. T. Stewart. Textbook of Biopharmaceutic Analysis, Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    S. H. Curry and R. Whelpton. Statistics of drug analysis, and the role of internal standards. In E. Reid (ed.), Blood Drugs and Other Analytical Challenges, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1978, pp. 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    P. Haefelfinger. Limits of the internal standard technique in chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 218:73–81 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    D. L. Massart, B. G. M. Andeginste, S. N. Deming, Y. Michotte, and L. Kaufman. Chemometrics a Textbook, Elsevier, New York, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    R. L. Anderson. Practical Statistics for Analytical Chemists, Van Nostrand, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    B. E. Cooper. Statistics for Experiments, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    E. L. Johnson, D. L. Reynolds, D. S. Wright, and L. A. Pachla. Biological sample preparation and data reduction concepts in pharmaceutical analysis. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 26:372–379 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    H. G. Boxenbaum, S. Riegelman, and R. M. Elashoff. Statistical estimations in pharmacokinetics. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 2:123–148 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    C. A. Dorschel, J. L. Ekmanis, J. E. Obertholtzer, F. V. Warren, Jr., and B. A. Bidlingmeyer. LC detectors: Evaluation and practical implications of linearity. Anal. Chem. 61:951A–968A (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. Nomenclature, symbols, units and their usage in spectrochemical analysis, II. Anal. Chem. 48:2294–2296 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    N. E. Saris. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry—Committee on Standards. Quality control in clinical chemistry, I. J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 18:69–77 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    G. L. Long and J. D. Winefordner. Limit of detection—A closer look at the IUPAC definition. Anal. Chem. 55:712A–722A (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    American Chemical Society's Committee on Environmental Improvement. Guidelines for data acquisition and data quality evaluation in environmental chemistry. Anal. Chem. 52:2242–2249 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    H. Kaiser. Two Papers on the Limit of Detection of a Complete Analytical Procedure, Hafner, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    J. O. Westgard and P. L. Barry. Cost-Effective Quality Control: Managing the Quality and Productivity of Analytical Processes, AACC Press, Washington, D.C., 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    W. J. Youden and E. H. Steiner. Statistical Manual of the A.O.A.C., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    S. Levey and E. R. Jennings. The use of control charts in the clinical laboratory. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 20:1059–1066 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    G. S. Cembrowski, J. O. Westgard, A. A. Eggert, and E. C. Toren. Trend detection in control data: Optimization and interpretation of Trigg's technique for trend analysis. Clin. Chem. 21:1396–1405 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    R. L. Anderson. Practical Statistics for Analytical Chemists, Van Nostrand, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karnes, H.T., Shiu, G. & Shah, V.P. Validation of Bioanalytical Methods. Pharm Res 8, 421–426 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015882607690

Download citation

  • quality control
  • quality assurance
  • validation
  • calibration
  • precision
  • accuracy