Skip to main content
Log in

Mesophilic Biomethanation and Treatment of Poultry Waste-Water Using Pilot Scale UASB Reactor

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The feasibility of applying the up-flow anaerobicsludge blanket (UASB) treatment for poultry waste (faeces)water was examined. A continuous-flow UASB pilot scalereactor of 3.50 L capacity using mixed culture was operatedfor 95 days to assess the treatability of poultry waste-water and its methane production. The maximum chemicaloxygen demand (COD) removed was found to be 78% whenorganic loading rate (OLR) was 2.9 kg COD m-3 day-1 athydraulic retention times (HRT) of 13.2 hr. The averagebiogas recovery was 0.26 m3 CH4 kg COD with an averagemethane content of 57% at mean temperature of 30 °C.Data indicate more rapid methanogenesis with higher loadingrates and shorter hydraulic retention times. At feedconcentration of 4.8 kg COD m-3 day-1, anaerobic digestionwas severely retarded at all hydraulic retention timetested. This complication in the reactor operations may belinked to build-up of colloidal solids often associated withpoultry waste water and ammonia toxicity. Isolates fromgranular sludge and effluent were found to be facultativeanaerobes most of which were Pseudomonas genera.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA (APHA, AWWA, LWPCT): 1995, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th ed., Washington D.C.

  • Christiansen, N., Hendriksen, H. V., Jurvinen, K. T. and Ahring, B. K.: 1995, 'Degradation of chlorinated aromatic compounds in UASB reactors', Wat. Sci. Tech. 31(1), 249–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinsdale, R. M., Hawkes, F. R. and Hawkes, D. L.: 1997, 'Comparison of mesophilic and thermophilic UASB reactors treating instant coffee production wastewater', Wat. Res. 31(1), 163–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, J. G., Kreyg, H. R., Sneath, R. H. A., Staley, J. T. and Williams, S. T.: 1994, Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 9th ed., The Williams and Wilken Company, Baltimore, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kispert, R. G., Sadek, S. E. and Wise, D. L.: 1975, 'An economic analysis of fuel gas production from solid waste', Resource Recov. Conserv. 1, 95–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster, W. and Lettinga, C.: 1985, 'Application of UASB process for treatment of complex wastewater at low temperatures', Biotech. Bioeng. 27, 1411–1417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khursheed, A., Faroogi, I. H. and Siddiqui, R. H.: 1997, 'Development of granular sludge on cane sugar mill waste treatment using a pilot scale UASB reactor', Indian J. Environ. Health 39(4), 315–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Missing, R. A.: 1988, 'Immobilized Cells in Anaerobic Waste Treatment', in M. Moogourg (ed.), Bioreactor Rhyzymes and Cells. Fundamentals and Application, Elsevier Applied Science, New York, pp. 311–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H.: 1960, Principles, Procedures and Statistics, New York, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • US/EPA: 1994, Poultry Processing Wastewater Treatment and Re-use, EPA-660/2-74-060.

  • Varel, V. H., Issacson, A. A. and Bryant, M. P.: 1977, 'Thermophilic methane production from cattle waste', Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 33(3), 298–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegant, W. M. and Lettinga, G.: 1985, 'Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of sugar in UASB reactors', Biotech. Bioeng. 27, 1603–1607.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernest I. Atuanya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atuanya, E.I., Aigbirior, M. Mesophilic Biomethanation and Treatment of Poultry Waste-Water Using Pilot Scale UASB Reactor. Environ Monit Assess 77, 139–147 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015871601658

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015871601658

Navigation