Abstract
In both German and English many fewer combinations of derivationalsuffixes exist than should be possible, given the types of selectional restrictionsthat have been posited in the existing literature. For each language we found a pervasiverestriction that is responsible for the missing combinations: German has closing suffixes,which individually prevent further suffixation. English allows only one Germanic suffix per word. In bothlanguages the restriction holds for inflection and forclitics as well. For German, we also found that all closing suffixes are followed by linkingelements in compounds, and that this constitutes the major productive use of linking elements.For English, we also found that Latinate suffixes are much more susceptible to combination,so that the Germanic and Latinate suffixes follow complementary patterns. Our findingsfor English show that the often-repeated observation that English inflectional morphology is simpler than that of related languages extends to derivation as well.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Anderson, Stephen. 1992. A-morphous Morphology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Anshen, Frank and Mark Aronoff. 1999. 'Using Dictionaries to Study the Mental Lexicon', Brain and Language 68, 16–26.
Anshen, Frank, Mark Aronoff, Roy J. Byrd and Judith Klavans. 1986. 'The Role of Etymology and Word Length in English Word Formation', unpublished manuscript, Stony Brook.
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 1, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Baayen, R. Harald and Antoinette Renouf. 1996.'Chronicling the Times: Productive Lexical Innovations in an English Newspaper', Language 72(1), 69–96.
Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English Word-Formation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Booij, Geert. 1985. 'Coordination Reduction in Complex Words: A Case for Prosodic Phonology', in H. van der Hulst and N. Smith (eds.), Advances in Non-Linear Phonology, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 143–160.
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Bybee, Joan and Dan Slobin. 1982. 'Rules and Schemas in the Development and Use of the English Past Tense', Language 58(2), 265–289.
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. 'Remarks on Nominalization', in R. A Jacobs and P. S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn-Blaisdell, Waltham, Massachusetts, pp. 184–221.
Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik. 1977. 'Filters and Control', Linguistic Inquiry 8(3): 425–504.
Cutler, Ann. 1981. 'Degrees of Transparency in Word Formation', Canadian Journal of Linguistics 26(1), 73–77.
Doleschal, Ursula. 1992. Movierung im Deutschen, Lincom Europa, Unterschleissheim.
Eisenberg, Peter. 1998. Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik: Das Wort, Metzler, Stuttgart, Weimar.
Fabb, Nigel. 1988. 'English Suffixation is Constrained only by Selectional Restrictions', Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6(4), 527–539.
Fleischer, Wolfgang. 1982. Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache, 5th edn, Niemeyer, Tübingen.
Francis, W. Nelson and Henry Kucera. 1982. Frequency Analysis of English Usage, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Fuhrhop, Nanna. 1998. Grenzfälle morphologischer Einheiten, Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 57, Stauffenburg, Tübingen.
Halpern, Aaron L. 1998. 'Clitics', in A. Spencer and A. M. Zwicky (eds.), Handbook of Morphology, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 101–122.
Jespersen, Otto. 1923. Growth and Structure of the English Language, 4th edn, D. Appleton, New York.
Jespersen, Otto. 1934 (1965). The Philosophy of Grammar, The Norton Library, New York.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. 'Lexical Morphology and Phonology', in I.-S. Yang (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Vol. 1, Hanshin, Seoul, pp. 3–91.
Lass, Roger. 1992. 'Phonology and Morphology', in N. Blake (ed.), The Cambridge History of English Language, Vol. 2(1066–1476), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 23–155.
Marchand, Hans. 1969. The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation, C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, München.
Oxford English Dictionary. 1994. 2nd edn, on CD-Rom, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Plag, Ingo. 1996. 'Selectional Restrictions in English Suffixation Revisited: A Reply to Fabb (1988)', Linguistics 34, 769–798.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, Longman, London and New York.
Robertson, Stuart. 1954. The Development of Modern English, revised by Frederic G. Cassidy, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Ross, John R. 1972. 'The Category Squish: Endstation Hauptwort', Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 316–339.
Siegel, Dorothy. 1974. Topics in English Morphology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Theissen, S., R. Alexis, M. Kefer and G.-T. Tewilt. 1992. Rückläufiges Wörterbuch des Deutschen, Université de Liè ge, Liè ge.
Walker, J. 1936 [1775]. Walker's Rhyming Dictionary, Dutton, New York.
Wiese, Richard. 1996. The Phonology of German, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Zwicky, Arnold. 1989. 'Quicker, More Quickly, *Quicklier', Yearbook of Morphology 2, 139–173.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aronoff, M., Fuhrhop, N. Restricting Suffix Combinations In German And English: Closing Suffixes And The Monosuffix Constraint. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20, 451–490 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015858920912
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015858920912