Skip to main content
Log in

Restricting Suffix Combinations In German And English: Closing Suffixes And The Monosuffix Constraint

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In both German and English many fewer combinations of derivationalsuffixes exist than should be possible, given the types of selectional restrictionsthat have been posited in the existing literature. For each language we found a pervasiverestriction that is responsible for the missing combinations: German has closing suffixes,which individually prevent further suffixation. English allows only one Germanic suffix per word. In bothlanguages the restriction holds for inflection and forclitics as well. For German, we also found that all closing suffixes are followed by linkingelements in compounds, and that this constitutes the major productive use of linking elements.For English, we also found that Latinate suffixes are much more susceptible to combination,so that the Germanic and Latinate suffixes follow complementary patterns. Our findingsfor English show that the often-repeated observation that English inflectional morphology is simpler than that of related languages extends to derivation as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, Stephen. 1992. A-morphous Morphology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anshen, Frank and Mark Aronoff. 1999. 'Using Dictionaries to Study the Mental Lexicon', Brain and Language 68, 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anshen, Frank, Mark Aronoff, Roy J. Byrd and Judith Klavans. 1986. 'The Role of Etymology and Word Length in English Word Formation', unpublished manuscript, Stony Brook.

  • Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 1, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, R. Harald and Antoinette Renouf. 1996.'Chronicling the Times: Productive Lexical Innovations in an English Newspaper', Language 72(1), 69–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English Word-Formation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, Geert. 1985. 'Coordination Reduction in Complex Words: A Case for Prosodic Phonology', in H. van der Hulst and N. Smith (eds.), Advances in Non-Linear Phonology, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, Joan and Dan Slobin. 1982. 'Rules and Schemas in the Development and Use of the English Past Tense', Language 58(2), 265–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1970. 'Remarks on Nominalization', in R. A Jacobs and P. S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn-Blaisdell, Waltham, Massachusetts, pp. 184–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik. 1977. 'Filters and Control', Linguistic Inquiry 8(3): 425–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, Ann. 1981. 'Degrees of Transparency in Word Formation', Canadian Journal of Linguistics 26(1), 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doleschal, Ursula. 1992. Movierung im Deutschen, Lincom Europa, Unterschleissheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, Peter. 1998. Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik: Das Wort, Metzler, Stuttgart, Weimar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabb, Nigel. 1988. 'English Suffixation is Constrained only by Selectional Restrictions', Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6(4), 527–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer, Wolfgang. 1982. Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache, 5th edn, Niemeyer, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, W. Nelson and Henry Kucera. 1982. Frequency Analysis of English Usage, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrhop, Nanna. 1998. Grenzfälle morphologischer Einheiten, Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 57, Stauffenburg, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, Aaron L. 1998. 'Clitics', in A. Spencer and A. M. Zwicky (eds.), Handbook of Morphology, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 101–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen, Otto. 1923. Growth and Structure of the English Language, 4th edn, D. Appleton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen, Otto. 1934 (1965). The Philosophy of Grammar, The Norton Library, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. 'Lexical Morphology and Phonology', in I.-S. Yang (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Vol. 1, Hanshin, Seoul, pp. 3–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lass, Roger. 1992. 'Phonology and Morphology', in N. Blake (ed.), The Cambridge History of English Language, Vol. 2(1066–1476), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 23–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, Hans. 1969. The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation, C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford English Dictionary. 1994. 2nd edn, on CD-Rom, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Plag, Ingo. 1996. 'Selectional Restrictions in English Suffixation Revisited: A Reply to Fabb (1988)', Linguistics 34, 769–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, Longman, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Stuart. 1954. The Development of Modern English, revised by Frederic G. Cassidy, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, John R. 1972. 'The Category Squish: Endstation Hauptwort', Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 316–339.

  • Siegel, Dorothy. 1974. Topics in English Morphology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theissen, S., R. Alexis, M. Kefer and G.-T. Tewilt. 1992. Rückläufiges Wörterbuch des Deutschen, Université de Liè ge, Liè ge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. 1936 [1775]. Walker's Rhyming Dictionary, Dutton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiese, Richard. 1996. The Phonology of German, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, Arnold. 1989. 'Quicker, More Quickly, *Quicklier', Yearbook of Morphology 2, 139–173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aronoff, M., Fuhrhop, N. Restricting Suffix Combinations In German And English: Closing Suffixes And The Monosuffix Constraint. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20, 451–490 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015858920912

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015858920912

Keywords

Navigation