Skip to main content
Log in

Colon-Specific Delivery of Dexamethasone from a Glucoside Prodrug in the Guinea Pig

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dexamethasone-β-D-glucoside is a potential prodrug for colonic delivery of the antiinflammatory agent, dexamethasone. The ability of this prodrug to deliver dexamethasone selectively to the colon depends not only on its being slowly absorbed from the alimentary canal, but also on its having chemical and enzymatic stability in the stomach and small intestine. Once reaching the large bowel, it should be quantitatively hydrolyzed to release the active agent. The potential of dexamethasone-β-D-glucoside for colon-specific delivery of dexamethasone is assessed by determining the rates of its hydrolysis down the alimentary canal of the guinea pig, an animal in which an inflammatory bowel disease model has been developed. The hydrolytic activity is examined in tissues and luminal contents of the stomach, proximal and distal segments of the small intestine, cecum, and colon. For the tissues, the greatest hydrolytic activity is in the proximal small intestine, while the stomach, cecum, and colon have only moderate activity. In contrast, the contents of the cecum and colon show greater activity than the contents of the small intestine and stomach. The luminal contents retained β-glucosidase activity even after repeated centrifugation and resuspension in a buffer. The activity was unaffected by homogenization. These observations suggest that hydrolytic activity is associated with enzymes located on the surface of luminal cells. The movement and hydrolysis of dexamethasone-β-D-glucoside down the gastrointestinal tract of the guinea pig are also examined. About 20 to 30% of an oral dose appears to reach the cecum. Here the prodrug is rapidly hydrolyzed to the active drug. From intravenous administration of the prodrug and drug, it is apparent that dexamethasone-β-D-glucoside is poorly absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract (bioavailability, <1%). There is a ninefold selective advantage for delivery of dexamethasone in cecal tissues in the guinea pig under the conditions of this experiment. Thus, there is a potential for a decrease in the usual dose and a concomitant reduction in the systemic exposure to dexamethasone. Because humans have much less glucosidase activity in the small intestine, even greater site-selective delivery to the cecum and colon is expected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. S. B. Hanauer and J. B. Kirsner. Medical therapy in ulcerative colitis. In J. B. Kirshner and R. G. Shorter (eds.), Inflammatory Bowel Disease, 3rd ed., Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 1988, pp. 431–475.

    Google Scholar 

  2. U. Klotz. Clinical pharmacokinetics of sulphasalazine, its metabolites and other prodrugs of 5-aminosalicylic acid. Clin. Pharmacokin. 10:285–302 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Jarnerot. Newer 5-aminosalicylic acid based drugs in chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Drugs 37:73–86 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. A. H. Lee, M. Taylor, V. H. T. Janes, and G. Walker. Rectally administered prednisolone—evidence for a predominantly local action. Gut 21:215–218 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Patterson. Studies on the absorption of hydrocortisone from the colon of patients with idiopathic ulcerative colitis. Tex. Rep. Biol. Med. 16:508–514 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. R. Kumana, T. Seaton, M. Meghji, M. Castelli, R. Benson, and S. Thillainathan. Beclomethasone dipropionate enemas for treating inflammatory bowel disease without producing Cushing's syndrome or hypothalamic pituitary adrenal suppression. Lancet 1:579–583 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Hawksworth, B. S. Drasar, and M. J. Hill. Intestinal bacteria and hydrolysis of glycosidic bonds. J. Med. Microbio. 4:451–459 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. R. Friend and G. W. Chang. A colon-specific drug delivery system based on drug glycosides and the glycosidases of colonic bacteria. J. Med. Chem. 27:261–267 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. R. Friend and G. W. Chang. Drug glycosides: Potential prodrugs for colon-specific drug delivery. J. Med. Chem. 28:51–57 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. A. Mackowiak. The normal microbial flora. N. Engl. J. Med. 307:83–93 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. L. Simon and S. L. Gorbach. The human intestinal micro-flora. Digest. Dis. Sci. 31 (Suppl. 9):147 S–162 S (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Watt and R. Marcus. Carrageenan-induced ulceration of the large intestine in the guinea pig. Gut 12:164–171 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. F. Evans, G. Pye, R. Bramley, A. C. Clark, T-J. Dyson, and J. D. Hardcastle. Measurement of gastrointestinal pH profiles in normal ambulant human subjects. Gut 29:1035–1041 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  14. U. G. Eriksson and T. N. Tozer. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of regional drug delivery. Acta Pharm. Jugosl. 37:331–344 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Rowland and T. N. Tozer. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 2nd ed., Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. L. Snipes. Anatomy of the guinea pig cecum. Anat. Embryol. 165:97–111 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. Pettersson, H. Ahlman, and J. Kewenter. A comparison of small intestinal transit time between the rat and the guinea pig. Acta Chir. Scand. 142:537–540 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  18. O. P. Malhorta and G. Phillip. Hydrolytic enzymes of mammalian intestines. II. Distribution of hydrolytic enzymes in dog, guinea pig, squirrel, albino rat and rabbit intestines. Ind. J. Med. Red. 53:410–416 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. M. Blatt and J. Scott. Response of the small intestinal mucosa to oral glucocorticoids. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 17 (Suppl. 4):75–88 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. M. Blatt and T. J. Peters. Effects of prednisolone on the small intestinal mucosa of the rat. Clin. Sci. Mol. Med. 50:511–523 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. Levanti, M. Fehlmann, M. Starita-Geribaldi, and P. Sudaka. Distribution le long de l'intestin du chien des enzymes de la bordure en bosse des enterocytes. Ann. Biol. Anim. Biochem. Biophys. 18:1155–1159 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Conchie and D. C. MacDonald, Glycosidases in the mammalian alimentary canal. Nature London 184:1233 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. P. Brown. Hydrolysis of glycosides and esters. In I. R. Rowland (ed.), Role of the Gut Flora in Toxicity and Cancer, Academic Press, London, 1988, pp. 109–144.

    Google Scholar 

  24. B. S. Drasar and M. J. Hill. Human Intestinal Flora, Academic Press, London, 1974, pp. 54–71.

    Google Scholar 

  25. P. Goldman. Biochemical pharmacology and toxicology involving the intestinal flora. In D. J. Hentges (ed.), Human Intestinal Flora in Health and Disease, Academic Press, New York, 1983, pp. 241–263.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. G. Renwick. First-pass metabolism within the lumen of the gastrointestinal tract. In C. F. George, D. G. Shand, and A. G. Renwick (eds.), Chemical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1, Presystemic Drug Elimination, Butterworth Scientific, London, 1982, pp. 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Spatz, E. G. McDaniel, and G. L. Laqueur. Cycasin excretion in conventional and germfree rats. Proc. Soc. Biol. Exp. Med. 121:417–422 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. D. Hardcastle and J. L. Wilkens. The action of sennosides and related compounds on human colon and rectum. Gut 11:1038–1042 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. E. Tsuei, R. G. Moore, J. J. Ashley, and W. G. McBride. Disposition of synthetic glucocorticoids. I. Pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone in healthy adults. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 7:249–264 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  30. G. Tamura, C. Gold, A. Ferro-Luzzi, and B. N. Ames. Fecalase: A model for activation of dietary glycosides to mutagens by intestinal flora. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:4961–4965 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  31. D. R. Friend, S. Phillips, A. D. McLeod, and T. N. Tozer. Relative antiinflammatory effect of oral dexamethasone-β-D-glucoside and dexamethasone in experimental inflammatory bowel disease J. Pharm. Pharmacol., in press (1991).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tozer, T.N., Rigod, J., McLeod, A.D. et al. Colon-Specific Delivery of Dexamethasone from a Glucoside Prodrug in the Guinea Pig. Pharm Res 8, 445–454 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015838825437

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015838825437

Navigation