Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the Twin Impinger for Size Measurement of Metered-Dose Inhaler Sprays

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The calibration of the first stage of the twin-stage impinger, an instrument proposed for use in measuring the spray size from metered-dose inhalers, was performed with monodisperse aerosols by a standard technique for cascade impactors. The mean cut point was found to be not particularly sensitive to operating variables which may be expected to occur in practice. The cut point was close to that reported previously, although the collection efficiency curve was found to be slightly sharper. Calculations are reported on the expected results of measurements on aerosols in a two-stage instrument with an idealized perfect collection efficiency curve as well as the curve measured for the twin impinger. These results indicate that important characteristics of spray size distribution cannot be distinguished with an ideal two-stage instrument; the twin impinger is less capable than an ideal instrument.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. S. P. Newman, D. Pavia, F. Moren, N. F. Sheehan, and S. W. Clark. Deposition of pressurized aerosols in the human respiratory tract. Thorax 36:52–55 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Stahlhofen, G. Rudolf, and A. C. James. Intercomparison of experimental regional aerosol deposition data. J. Aer. Med. 2(3):285–308 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. R. Byron. Aerosol formulation, generation, and delivery using metered systems. In P. R. Byron (ed.), Respiratory Drug Delivery, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. W. Hallworth. The formulation and evaluation of pressurized metered-dose aerosols. In D. Ganderton and T. J. Jones (eds.), Drug Delivery to the Respiratory Tract, VCH, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. Gonda. Study of the effects of polydispersity of aerosols on regional deposition in the respiratory tract. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 52P (1981).

  6. A. J. Hickey. Factors influencing aerosol deposition in inertial impactors and their effect on particle-size characterization. Pharm. Tech. 14(9):118–130 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. M. Phillips, P. R. Byron, K. Fults, and A. J. Hickey. Optimized inhalation aerosols. II. Inertial testing methods for particle size analysis of pressurized inhalers. Pharm. Res. 7:1228–1233 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. W. Hallworth and U. G. Andrews. Size analysis of suspension inhalation aerosols by inertial separation methods. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 28:898–907 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. P. Martin, A. E. Bell, and C. Marriott. An in vitro method for assessing particle deposition in inertial impactors and their effect on particle-size characterization. Int. J. Pharm. 44:57–63 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. USP XXII/NFXVII, Mack, 1989, pp. 515, 735, 836.

  11. G. W. Hallworth, and R. R. Hamilton. Size analysis of metered suspension pressurized aerosols with the Quantimet 720. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 28:890–897 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. J. Davies, K. K. Amin, and G. A. Mott. Particle size of inhalation aerosol systems. I. Production of homogeneous dispersions. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 6:645–651 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. W. Hallworth and D. G. Westmoreland. The twin impinger: A simple device for assessing the delivery of drugs from metered dose pressurized aerosol inhalers. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 39:966–972 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  14. British Pharmacopoeia, 1988, p. 875, Appendix XVII C, A204–A207.

  15. P. A. Haywood, M. Martin-Smith, J. M. Padfield, I. J. Smith, and R. N. Woodhouse. Establishing more meaningful specifications and tests for metered-dose pressurized inhalers formulated as suspensions. Pharm. Forum 15(3):5193–5202 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. G. Childers. Twin impinger testing for the evaluation of dose deposition of MDI products. In P. Atkins (ed.); Particle size of metered dose inhalers—current methodologies. In R. N. Dalby and R. Evans (eds.), Proceedings of the Second Respiratory Drug Delivery Symposium, March 26–30, 1990, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy Office of Continuing Education, Lexington, Kentucky, 1991.

  17. R. N. Berglund and B. Y. H. Liu. Generation of monodisperse aerosol standards. Environ. Sci. Technol. 7:147–153 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  18. V. A. Marple, K. L. Rubow, and S. M. Behm. A microorifice uniform uniform deposit impactor (MOUDI) description, calibration and use. Aerosol Sci. Tech. 14:434–446 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. B. Lodge and T. L. Chan (eds.). Cascade Impactors, American Industrial Hygiene Association Monograph Series, AIHA 475 Wolf Lodge Parkway, Akron, Ohio 44311-1087.

  20. V. A. Marple, K. L. Rubow, U. Turner, and J. D. Spengler. Low flow rate sharp cut impactors for indoor air sampling: design and calibration. J. Air Pol. Cont. Assoc. 37:1303–1307 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  21. W. C. Hinds. Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles, J. Wiley, New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. N. Dalby and P. R. Byron. Comparison of output particle size distributions from pressurized aerosols formulated as solutions or suspensions. Pharm. Res. 5:36–39 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, N.C., Marple, V.A., Schultz, R.K. et al. Assessment of the Twin Impinger for Size Measurement of Metered-Dose Inhaler Sprays. Pharm Res 9, 1123–1127 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015835301929

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015835301929

Navigation