Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Mucoadhesive Polymers in Ocular Drug Delivery. I. Viscous Solutions

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The potential of a mucoadhesive polymer as an ophthalmic vehicle is evaluated within the rabbit. Precorneal clearance of a mucoadhesive polymer solution (Carbopol 934P) is compared to that of an equiviscous nonmucoadhesive poly(vinyl alcohol) solution (PVA) and buffer (PBS). The precorneal retention of the Carbopol 934P, as studied by lacrimal dacryoscintigraphy, is shown to be significantly greater (P < 0.05) than that of PVA, which, in turn, is significantly greater than that of PBS. The effect of the polymer solution on the bioavailability of pilocarpine is subsequently assessed by measuring the relative miotic response intensities produced by a 1% solution of the drug. Carbopol 934P solution produces a significant increase (P < 0.05) in bioavailability as compared to PVA and PBS. The bioavailability from PVA is significantly greater (P < 0.05) than that from PBS. Studies evaluating vehicle-drug association indicated no binding of the drug to the polymer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. J. W. Shell. Pharmacokinetics of topically applied ophthalmic drugs. Surv. Ophthalmol. 26:207–218 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. S. Chrai and J. R. Robinson. Ocular evaluation of methylcellulose vehicle in albino rabbits. J. Pharm. Sci. 63:1218–1223 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. F. Patton and J. R. Robinson. Ocular evaluation of polyvinyl alcohol vehicle in rabbits. J. Pharm. Sci. 64:1312–1316 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. A. Benedetto, D. O. Shah, and H. E. Kaufman. Instilled fluid dynamics and surface chemistry of polymers in the preocular tear film. Invest. Ophthalmol. 14:887–902 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. A. Lemp and E. S. Szymanski. Polymer adsorption at the ocular surface. Arch. Ophthalmol. 93:134–136 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. F. Saettone, B. Giannaccini, S. Ravecca, F. La Marca, and G. Tota. Polymer effects on ocular bioavailability—The influence of different liquid vehicles on the mydriatic response of tropicamide in humans and in rabbits. Int. J. Pharm. 20:187–202 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. W. Hui and J. R. Robinson. Ocular delivery of progesterone using a bioadhesive polymer. Int. J. Pharm. 26:203–213 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Gurny, H. Ibrahim, A. Aebi, P. Buri, C. G. Wilson, N. Washington, P. Edman, and O. Camber. Design and evaluation of controlled release systems for the eye. J. Control. Rel. 6:367–373 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. F. Saettone, P. Chetoni, M. T. Torracca, S. Burgalassi, and B. Giannaccini. Evaluation of muco-adhesive properties and in vivo activity of ophthalmic vehicles based on hyaluronic acid. Int. J. Pharm. 51:203–212 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. Park and J. R. Robinson. Bioadhesive polymers as platforms for oral-controlled drug delivery: Method to study bioadhesion. Int. J. Pharm. 19:107–127 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. D. Smart, I. W. Kellaway, and H. E. C. Worthington. An in vitro investigation of mucosa-adhesive materials for use in controlled drug delivery. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 36:295–299 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. F. Saettone, B. Giannaccini, A. Guiducci, F. La Marca, and G. Tota. Polymer effects on ocular bioavailability. II The influence of benzalkonium chloride on the mydriatic response of tropicamide in different polymeric vehicles. Int. J. Pharm. 25:73–83 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. H. L. Lee and J. R. Robinson. Mechanistic and quantitative evaluation of precorneal pilocarpine disposition in albino rabbits. J. Pharm. Sci. 68:673–684 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Morimoto, K. Morisaka, and A. Kamada. Enhancement of nasal absorption of insulin and calcitonin using polyacrylic acid gel. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 37:134–136 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. K. Mitra and T. J. Mikkelson. Mechanism of transcorneal permeation of pilocarpine. J. Pharm. Sci. 77:771–775 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. F. Saettone, B. Giannaccini, A. Guiducci, and P. Savigni. Semisolid ophthalmic vehicles. III An evaluation of four organic hydrogels containing pilocarpine. Int. J. Pharm. 31:261–270 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davies, N.M., Fair, S.J., Hadgraft, J. et al. Evaluation of Mucoadhesive Polymers in Ocular Drug Delivery. I. Viscous Solutions. Pharm Res 8, 1039–1043 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015813225804

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015813225804

Navigation