Skip to main content
Log in

Parametric Decomposition of a Generalized Malmquist Productivity Index

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a parametric decomposition of a generalized Malmquist productivity index which takes into account scale economies. Unlike Balk (2001), the contribution of scale economies to productivity change is evaluated without recourse to scale efficiency measures, which are neither bounded for globally increasing, decreasing, or constant returns to scale technologies nor for ray-homogeneous technologies. An empirical application using panel data from Spanish savings banks is included. This application shows the advantages of the suggested method compared to Balk's approach. The results show an increase of total factor productivity which can be mainly attributed to technical progress and the positive effect of returns to scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhavein, J. D., A. N. Berger and D. Humphrey. (1997). “The Effects of Mega Mergers on Efficiency and Prices: Evidence from a Bank Profit Function.” Review of Industrial Organization 12, 95-139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balk, B. M. (1998). Industrial Price, Quantity, and Productivity Indices: The Micro-Economic Theory and an Application. Boston/Dordrech/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balk, B. M. (2001). “Scale Efficiency and Productivity Change.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 15, 159-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D. (1984). “Estimating the Most Productive Scale Size using Data Envelopment Analysis.” European Journal of Operational Research 17, 35-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. and T. J. Coelli. (1992). “Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data: With Application to Paddy Farmers in India.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 3, 153-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D. W., L. R. Christensen and W. E. Diewert. (1982). “The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity.” Econometrica 50, 1393-1414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, T. J. and S. Perelman. (2000). “Technical Efficiency of European Railways:A Distance Function Approach.” Applied Economics 32, 1967-1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, T. J., D. S. Prasada Rao and G. Battese. (1998). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuesta, R. A. and Luis Orea. (2002). “Mergers and Technical Efficiency in Spanish Savings Banks: A Stochastic Distance Function Approach.” Journal of Banking and Finance, forthcoming.

  • Denny, M., M. Fuss and L. Waverman. (1981). “The Measurement and Interpretation of Total Factor Productivity in Regulated Industries with an Application to Canadian Telecommunications.” In T. G. Cowing and R. E. Stevenson (eds.), Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries. New York: Academic Press, 179-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W. E. (1976). “Exact and Superlative Index Numbers.” Journal of Econometrics 4, 115-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R. (1975). “A Note on Ray-homogeneous and Ray-homothetic Production Functions.” Swedish Journal of Economics 77, 366-372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, M. Norris and Z. Zhang. (1994). “Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries.” American Economic Review 84, 66-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R. and D. Primont. (1995). Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 120, 253-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Førsund, F. R. (1997). “The Malmquist Productivity Index, TFP and Scale.” Taipei International Conference on Efficiency and Productivity Growth, June 20-21.

  • Grifell, E. and C. A. Knox Lovell. (1997). “The Sources of Productivity Change in Spanish Banking.” European Journal of Operational Research 98, 364-380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grifell, E. and C. A. Knox Lovell. (1999). “A Generalized Malmquist Productivity Index.” Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa 7, 81-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, S. C. and E. Desli. (1997). “Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries: Comment.” American Economic Review 85, 1033-1039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, S. C. (1998). “Measuring Scale Efficiency from a Translog Production Function.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 11, 183-194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, C. and L. Simar. (1997). “Pitfalls of Normal-Gamma Stochastic Frontier Models.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 8, 167-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, K. E. (1998). “Nontraditional Activities and the Efficiency of U.S. Commercial Banks.” Journal of Banking and Finance 22: 467-482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sealey, C. W. and J. T. Lindley. (1977). “Inputs, Outputs, and a Theory of Production and Cost at Depository Financial Institutions.” Journal of Finance 32(4), 1251-1266.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Orea, L. Parametric Decomposition of a Generalized Malmquist Productivity Index. Journal of Productivity Analysis 18, 5–22 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015793325292

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015793325292

Navigation