Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Technical Efficiency and Location Choice of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We establish a theoretical model to explain the relationship between the regional technical efficiencies and production location choice. A higher regional technical efficiency level attracts foreign direct investment (FDI) and offsets the adverse effects of a high wage rate and setup cost. Data from Taiwan's SMEs during the period 1989–1996 are collected. Observations are classified into three exclusive and exhaustive groups: SMEs without FDI, SMEs with FDI in mainland China, and SMEs with FDI in other countries. We then apply the multi-logit model to test the relationship between the technical efficiency and FDI location choice. Taiwan's SMEs with higher technical efficiencies are less likely to invest in mainland China. Technical efficiencies do not significantly influence the location choice between Taiwan and other countries. The wage rate is a significant motive for SMEs to invest internationally, while the setup cost is not an important factor to affect firms' location choices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afriat, S. N., 1972, ‘Efficiency Estimation of Production Functions’, International Economic Review 13, 568-598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aigner, D. J., C. A. K. Lovell and P. Schmidt, 1977, ‘Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models’, Journal of Econometrics 17, 21-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. E. and T. J. Coelli, 1992, ‘Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data: With Application to Paddy Farmers in India’, Journal of Productivity Analysis 3, 153-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. E. and T. J. Coelli, 1995, ‘A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data’, Empirical Economics 20, 325-332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E., 1982, Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, T., 1992, ‘Determinants of Taiwan's Direct Foreign Investment: The Case of a Newly Industrializing Country’, Journal of Development Economics 39, 397-407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. and T. Chen, 1998, ‘Network Linkage and Location Choice in Foreign Direct Investment’, Journal of International Business Studies 29, 445-467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, T. J., 1996, ‘A Guide to FRONTIER Version 4.1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Function Estimation’, CEPA Working Paper 96/07, Department of Econometrics, University of New England (Australia).

  • Cornwell, C., P. Schmidt and R. C. Sickles, 1990, ‘Production Frontiers with Cross-Sectional and Time-Series Variation in Efficiency Levels’, Journal of Econometrics 46, 185-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G., 1959, Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J., 1980, ‘Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests’, Journal of Inter-national Business Studies 11, 9-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J., 1981, International Production and the Multinational Enterprise, London, UK: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H., 1988, ‘The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extension’, Journal of International Business Studies 19, 1-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J., 1995, ‘Reappraising the Eclectic Paradigm in an Age of Alliance Capitalism’, Journal of International Business Studies 26, 461-491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J., 1997, ‘Re-evaluating the Benefits of Foreign Direct Investment’, in J. Dunning (ed.), Alliance Capitalism and Global Business, London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erramilli, M. K. and D. E. Souza, 1995, ‘Uncertainty and Foreign Direct Investment: The Role of Moderators’, International Marketing Review 12, 47-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J., 1957, ‘The Measurement of Productive Efficiency’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 120, 253-290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., 1995a, ‘Small and Medium-Sized Transnational Corporations: Trends and Patterns of Foreign Direct Investment’, Small Business Economics 7, 183-204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., 1995b, ‘Small and Medium-Sized Transnational Corporations: Salient Features’, Small Business Economics 7, 251-271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., 1997, ‘Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Foreign Direct Investment’, in P. J. Buckley, J. Campos and H. Mirza (eds.), International Technology Transfer by Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, New York: ST. Martin's Press, pp. 9-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemunden, H. G. and P. Heydebreck, 1995, ‘The External Links and Networks of Small Firms — their Role and Nature’, Globalisation, Networking and Small Firm Innovation, 87-100.

  • Greene, W. H., 1980, ‘Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Econometric Frontier Functions’, Journal of Econometrics 13, 27-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, R. W. and M. W. Pustay, 1996, International Business: A Managerial Perspective, Reading (Massachusetts): Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubaugh, S. G., 1987, ‘The Process of Direct Foreign Investment’, Southern Economic Journal 54, 351-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst, T., 1972, ‘Firms and Industry Determinants of Decision to Invest Abroad: An Empirical Study’, Review of Economics and Statistics 54, 258-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S., 1960, The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Investment, Ph.D. Thesis, MIT (Published by MIT Press under Same Title in 1976).

  • Johanson, J. and L. Mattson, 1987, ‘Internationalisation in Industrial System — A Network Approach’, Strategies in Global Competition, London: Routledge, pp. 287-315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D., M. Klinedinst and C. Rock, 1998, ‘Productive Efficiency During Transition: Evidence from Bulgarian Panel Data’, Journal of Comparative Economics 26, 446-464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., J. Koo and Y. Lee, 1999, ‘Infrastructure and Production Efficiency: An Analysis on the Korean Manufacturing Industry’, Contemporary Economic Policy 17, 390-400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, T. O., 1997, ‘Small Firms as International Players’, Small Business Economics 9, 45-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojima, K., 1978, Direct Foreign Investment: A Japanese Model of Multinational Business Operations, Croom Helm.

  • Lall, S., 1980, ‘Monopolistic Advantages and Foreign Involvement by U.S. Manufacturing Industry’, Oxford Economic Papers 32, 102-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E., Jr., 1993, ‘Making a Miracle’, Econometrica 61, 251-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, K. and G. E. Battese, 2000, ‘Firm Size, Age, and Efficiency: Evidence from Kenyan Manufacturing Firms’, The Journal of Development Studies 36, 146-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S., 1982, Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell, A., M. D. Whinston and J. R. Green, 1995, Microeconomic Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen, W. and J. van den Broeck, 1977, ‘Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error’, International Economic Review 18, 435-444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, M. M. and L. F. Lee, 1981, ‘The Measurement and Sources of Technical Inefficiency in the Indonesian Weaving Industry’, Journal of Development Economics 9, 43-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, J., 1974, ‘Estimating the Efficiency of Production’, International Economic Review 15, 515-521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, P., 1976, ‘On the Statistical Estimation of Parametric Frontier Production Functions’, Review of Economic and Statistics 58, 238-239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, P. and R. Sickles, 1984, ‘Production Frontiers and Panel Data’, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2, 367-374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utata, S. and H. Kawai, 2000, ‘The Determinants of the Location Of Foreign Direct Investment by Japanese Small and Medium-sized Enterprises’, Small Business Economics 15, 79-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hoesel, R., 1996, ‘Taiwan Foreign Investment and the Transformation of the Economy’, in J. H. Dunning and R. Narula (eds.), Foreign Direct Investment and Government: Catalysts for Economic Restructuring, London: Routledge, pp. 280-315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. R., 1992, Microeconomic Analysis, 3rd ed., New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R., 1970, ‘Organization as a Scale Factor in the Growth of Firms’, in J. W. Markham and G. F. Papanek (eds.), Industrial Organization and Economic Development, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, pp. 47-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, B., 1977, ‘Industrial Diversification and Internationalization: Some Empirical Evidence’, Journal of Industrial Economics 26, 177-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C. M. J. and K. Ito, 1988, ‘Oligopolistic Reaction and Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of the U.S. Tire and Textiles Industries’, Journal of International Business Studies 19, 449-460.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Y., Hu, JL. Technical Efficiency and Location Choice of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Small Business Economics 19, 1–12 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015770220239

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015770220239

Keywords

Navigation