Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 471–482 | Cite as

Segregation analysis of prostate cancer in 1719 white, African-American and Asian-American families in the United States and Canada

  • Gail Gong
  • Ingrid Oakley-Girvan
  • Anna H. Wu
  • Laurence N. Kolonel
  • Esther M. John
  • Dee W. West
  • Anna Felberg
  • Richard P. Gallagher
  • Alice S. Whittemore
Article

Abstract

Some data suggest that brothers of prostate cancer patients have higher disease risk than their fathers, supporting an X-linked or recessive mode of inheritance. However, higher observed frequencies in brothers than fathers may merely reflect the strong temporal changes in US incidence rates. Objectives: (a) to evaluate the fit of X-linked, recessive, and dominant modes of inheritance to prostate cancer incidence, specific for calendar year, age, and race, in population-based samples of US and Canadian families; and (b) to evaluate a simple multifactorial model for familial aggregation of prostate cancer due to shared low-penetrance variants of many genes or shared lifestyle factors. Methods: The data consist of reported prostate cancer incidence in first-degree relatives of 1719 white, African-American, and Asian-American men with and without prostate cancer at ages < 70 years. Model parameters were estimated by maximizing a pseudo-likelihood function of the data, and goodness of model fit was assessed by evaluating discrepancies between observed and expected numbers of pairs of relatives with prostate cancer. Results: After adjusting for temporal trends in prostate cancer incidence rates we found that the X-linked model fit poorly, underpredicting the observed number of affected father–son pairs. This also was true of the recessive model, although the evidence for poor fit did not achieve statistical significance. In contrast, the dominant model provided adequate fit to the data. In this model the race-specific penetrance estimates for carriers of deleterious genotypes were similar among African-Americans and whites, but lower among Asian-Americans: risk by age 80 years for carriers born in 1900 was estimated as 75.3% for African-Americans and whites, and 44.4% for Asian-Americans. None of the Mendelian models fit the data better than did the simple multifactorial model. Conclusions: The good fit of the multifactorial model suggests that multiple genes, each having low penetrance, may be responsible for most inherited prostate cancer susceptibility, and that the contribution of rare highly penetrant mutations is small.

dominant inheritance prostate cancer recessive inheritance segregation analysis X-linked inheritance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, Thun M(2001) Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin 51: 15-36.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Woolf CM (1960) An investigation of the familial aspects of cancer of the prostate. Cancer 13: 739-744.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cannon LA, Bishop DT, Skolnick M, Hunt S, Lyon JL, Smart CR (1982) Genetic epidemiology of prostate cancer in the Utah Mormon genealogy. Cancer Surv 1: 47-69.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meikle AW, Stanish WM (1982) Familial prostatic cancer risk and low testosterone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 54: 1104-1108.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carter BS, Carter HB, Isaacs JT (1990) Epidemiologic evidence regarding predisposing factors to prostate cancer. Prostate 16: 187-197.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steinberg GD, Carter BS, Beaty TH, Childs B, Walsh PC (1990) Family history and the risk of prostate cancer. Prostate 17: 337-347.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spitz MR, Currier RD, Fueger JJ, Babaian RJ, Newell GR (1991) Familial patterns of prostate cancer: a case-control analysis. J Urol 146: 1305-1307.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goldgar DE, Easton DF, Cannon-Albright LA, Skolnick MH (1994) Systematic population-based assessment of cancer risk in first-degree relatives of cancer probands. J Natl Cancer Inst 86: 1600-1608.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Whittemore AS, Wu AH, Kolonel LN, et al. (1995) Family history and prostate cancer risk in black, white, and Asian men in the United States and Canada. Am J Epidemiol 141: 732-740.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Monroe KR, Yu MC, Kolonel LN, et al. (1995) Evidence of an Xlinked or recessive genetic component to prostate cancer risk. Nat Med 1: 827-829.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Whittemore AS (1994) Prostate cancer. Cancer Surv 20: 309-322.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Potosky AL, Miller BA, Albertsen PC, Kramer BS (1995) The role of increasing detection in the rising incidence of prostate cancer. JAMA 273: 548-552.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hankey BF, Feuer EJ, Clegg LX, et al. (1999) Cancer surveillance series: interpreting trends in prostate cancer-Part I: Evidence of the effects of screening in recent prostate cancer incidence, mortality, and survival rates. J Natl Cancer Inst 91: 1017-1024.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ostrander EA, Stanford JL (2000) Genetics of prostate cancer: too many loci, too few genes. Am J Hum Genet 67: 1367-1375.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ingles SA, Ross RK, Yu MC, et al. (1997) Association of prostate cancer risk with genetic polymorphisms in vitamin D receptor and androgen receptor. J Natl Cancer Inst 89: 166-170.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stanford JL, Just JJ, Gibbs M, et al. (1997) Polymorphic repeats in the androgen receptor gene: molecular markers of prostate cancer risk. Cancer Res 57: 1194-1198.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Edwards SM, Badzioch MD, Minter R, et al. (1999) Androgen receptor polymorphisms: association with prostate cancer risk, relapse and overall survival. Int J Cancer 84: 458-465.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nam RK, Elhaji Y, Krahn MD, et al. (2000) Significance of the cag repeat polymorphism of the androgen receptor gene in prostate cancer progression. J Urol 164: 567-572.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xu J, Meyers D, Freije D, et al. (1998) Evidence for a prostate cancer susceptibility locus on the X chromosome. Nature Gen 20: 175-179.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carter BS, Beaty TH, Steinberg GD, Childs B, Walsh PC (1992) Mendelian inheritance of familial prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 3367-3371.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gronberg H, Damber L, Damber JE, Iselius L (1997) Segregation analysis of prostate cancer in Sweden: support for dominant inheritance. Am J Epidemiol 146: 552-557.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schaid DJ, McDonnell SK, Blute ML, Thibodeau SN (1998) Evidence for autosomal dominant inheritance of prostate cancer. Am J Hum Genet 62: 1425-1438.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cui J, Staples MP, Hopper JL, English DR, McCredie MR, Giles GG (2001) Segregation analyses of 1,476 population-based Australian families affected by prostate cancer. Am J Hum Genet 68: 1207-1218.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Smith JR, Freije D, Carpten JD, et al. (1996) Major susceptibility locus for prostate cancer on chromosome 1 suggested by a genomewide search. Science 274: 1371-1374.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cooney KA, McCarthy JD, Lange E, et al. (1997) Prostate cancer susceptibility locus on chromosome 1q: a confirmatory study. J Natl Cancer Inst 89: 955-959.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Berthon P, Valeri A, Cohen-Akenine A, et al. (1998) Predisposing gene for early-onset prostate cancer, localized on chromosome 1q42.2-43. Am J Hum Genet 62: 1416-1424.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gibbs M, Chakrabarti L, Stanford JL, et al. (1999) Analysis of chromosome 1q42.2-43 in 152 families with high risk of prostate cancer. Am J Hum Genet 64: 1087-1095.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gibbs M, Stanford JL, McIndoe RA, et al. (1999) Evidence for a rare prostate cancer-susceptibility locus at chromosome 1p36. Am J Hum Genet 64: 776-787.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tavtigian SV, Simard J, Teng DH, et al. (2001) A candidate prostate cancer susceptibility gene at chromosome 17p. Nat Genet 27: 172-180.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Berry R, Schroeder JJ, French AJ, et al. (2000) Evidence for a prostate cancer-susceptibility locus on chromosome 20. Am J Hum Genet 67: 82-91.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    McIndoe RA, Stanford JL, Gibbs M, et al. (1997) Linkage analysis of 49 high-risk families does notsupporta common familial prostate cancer-susceptibility gene at 1q24-25. Am J Hum Genet 61: 347-353. Segregation analysis of prostate cancer 481Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Eeles RA, Durocher F, Edwards S, et al. (1998) Linkage analysis of chromosome 1q markers in 136 prostate cancer families. The Cancer Research Campaign/British Prostate Group U.K. Familial Prostate Cancer Study Collaborators. Am J Hum Genet 62: 653-658.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Whittemore AS, Lin IG, Oakley-Girvan I, et al. (1999) No evidence of linkage for chromosome 1q42.2-43 in prostate cancer. Am J Hum Genet 65: 254-256.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Berry R, Schaid DJ, Smith JR, et al. (2000) Linkage analyses att he chromosome 1 loci 1q24-25 (HPC1), 1q42.2-43 (PCAP), and 1p36 (CAPB) in families with hereditary prostate cancer. Am J Hum Genet 66: 539-546.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vesprini D, Nam RK, Trachtenberg J, et al. (2001) HPC2 variants and screen-detected prostate cancer. Am J Hum Genet 68: 912-917.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Xu J, Zheng SL, Carpten JD, et al. (2001) Evaluation of linkage and association of HPC2/ELAC2 in patients with familial or sporadic prostate cancer. Am J Hum Genet 68: 901-911.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Whittemore AS, Kolonel LN, Wu AH, et al. (1995) Prostate cancer in relation to diet, physical activity, and body size in blacks, whites, and Asians in the United States and Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 87: 652-661.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Whittemore AS, Halpern J (1997) Multi-stage sampling in genetic epidemiology. Stat Med 16: 153-167.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Siegmund KD, Whittemore AS, Thomas DC (1999) Multistage sampling for disease family registries. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 26: 43-48.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Little JA, Rubin DB (1987) Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Whittemore AS (1997) Multistage sampling designs and estimating equations. J R Stat Soc, Series B 59: 589-602.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Breslow N (1990) Tests of hypotheses in overdispersed Poisson regression and other quasi-likelihood models. J Am Stat Assoc 85: 565-571.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Whittemore AS, Gong G, Itnyre J (1997) Prevalence and contribution of BRCA1 mutations in breast cancer and ovarian cancer: results from three U.S. population-based case-control studies of ovarian cancer. Am J Hum Genet 60: 496-504.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Whittemore AS, Halpern J, Gong G (1998) Testing covariance structure in multivariate models: application to family disease data. J Am Stat Assoc 93: 518-525.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gong G, Whittemore AS (1999) Estimating genetic influence on disease from population-based case-control data: application to cancers of the breast and ovary. Stat Med 18: 3321-3336.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Helgesen F, Holmberg L, Johansson JE, Bergstrom R, Adami HO (1996) Trends in prostate cancer survival in Sweden, 1960 through 1988: evidence of increasing diagnosis of nonlethal tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 88: 1216-1221.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Doll R, Payne P, Waterhouse J (1966) Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. IARC Scientific Publications, Vol. I. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Waterhouse J, Muir C, Correa P, Powell J (1976) Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. IARC Scientific Publications No. 15. Vol. III Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Waterhouse J, Muir C, Shanmugaratnam K, Powell J (1982) Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. IARC Scientific Publications No. 42. Vol. IV. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Muir C, Waterhouse J, Mack T, Powell J, Whelan S (1987) Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. IARC Scientific Publications No. 88. Vol. V. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Parkin DM, Muir CS, Whelan SL, Gao YT, Ferlay J, Powell J (1992) Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. IARC Scientific Publications No. 120. Vol. VI. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Raymond L, Young J (1997) Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. IARC Scientific Publications No. 143. Vol. VII. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gail Gong
    • 1
  • Ingrid Oakley-Girvan
    • 1
  • Anna H. Wu
    • 2
  • Laurence N. Kolonel
    • 3
  • Esther M. John
    • 4
  • Dee W. West
    • 4
  • Anna Felberg
    • 1
  • Richard P. Gallagher
    • 5
  • Alice S. Whittemore
    • 6
    • 7
  1. 1.Stanford University School of MedicineUSA
  2. 2.Norris Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of Southern CaliforniaUSA
  3. 3.Cancer Center of HawaiiUniversity of Hawaii at ManoaUSA
  4. 4.Northern California Cancer CenterUSA
  5. 5.British Columbia Cancer AgencyUSA
  6. 6.Stanford University School of MedicineUSA
  7. 7.Department of Health Research and PolicyStanford University of MedicineStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations