Abstract
Nguyen and Reznek (1991) used plant-level data for five 4-digit SIC industries to estimate and compare the degrees of returns-to-scale for establishments of various size classes for the years 1977 and 1982. They found that the estimated scale elasticities of all plant sizes have values approximately equal to one. They, therefore, concluded that both small and large establishments under study are equally efficient in production. The purpose of the present study is to extend and improve upon Nguyen and Reznek's work by (1) extending the data set to cover the entire U.S. manufacturing sector, (2) improving the model by including energy as a separate input in production, and (3) relaxing the assumption of homogeneity and estimating an unrestricted (non-homogeneous, non-homothetic) production model. With the improved model and data, it is found that the estimated scale elasticities for all sizes of establishment are statistically insignificantly different from one. Thus, the result confirms and strengthens Nguyen and Reznek's finding that a large establishment size is not a necessary condition for efficient production.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acs, Z. D. (ed.), 1996, Small Firms and Economic Growth, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.
Acs, Z., D. Audretsch and B. Carlson, 1991, ‘Flexible Technology and Firm Size’, Small Business Economics 3, 307-320.
Aiginger, K. and G. Tichy, 1991, ‘Small Firms and Merger Mania’, Small Business Economics 3(2), 83-101.
Bates, T. and A. Nucci, 1990, ‘An Analysis of Small Business Size and Rate of Discontinuance’, CES Discussion Paper, CES 90-2, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington DC.
Berndt, E. R. and D. O. Wood, 1975, ‘Technology, Production, and the Derived Demand for Energy’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 68, 647-656.
Bradburd, R. M. and D. R. Ross, 1989, ‘Can Small Firms Find and Defend Niches? A test of Porter Hypothesis’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 71(2), 258-262.
Brock, W. A., and D. S. Evans, 1986, The Economics of Small Business: Their Role and Regulation in the U.S. Economy, New York: N.Y. Holmes and Meier Publishers.
Burgess, D. F., 1975, ‘Duality Theory and Pitfalls in the Specification of Technologies’, Journal of Econometrics 3, 105-121.
Caves, R. and D. Barton, 1990, Efficiency In U.S. Manufacturinq Industries, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Chambers, R. G., 1988, Applied Production Analysis: A Dual Approach, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Christensen, L. R. and W. H. Greene, 1976, ‘Economies of Scale in U.S. Electric Power Generation’, Journal of Political Economy 84, 655-676.
Christensen, L. R., D. W. Jorgenson and L. J. Lau, 1971, ‘Conjugate Duality and the Transcendental Logarithmic Production Function’, Econometrica 39, 255-256.
Doms, M. E., 1996, ‘Estimating Capital Efficiency Schedules within Production Functions’, Economic Inquiry 34, 78-92.
Dunne, T., 1994, ‘Plant Age and Technology Use in U.S. Manufacturing Industries’, RAND Journal of Economics 25(3), 488-499.
Dunne, T., M. J. Roberts and L. Samuelson, 1988, ‘Patterns of Firm Entry and Exit in U.S. Manufacturing Industries’, RAND Journal of Economics 19(4), 495-515.
Dunne, T., M. J. Roberts and L. Samuelson, 1989, ‘The Growth and Failure in U.S Manufacturing Plants’, Quarterly Journal of Economics (November), 671-698.
Dwyer, D. W., 1997, ‘Productivity Races II: The Issues of Capital Measurement’, CES Discussion Paper, CES 97-3, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Bureau of The Census, Washington DC.
Gallant, A. R., 1987, Nonlinear Statistical Models, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Gallant, A. R. and D. W. Jorgenson, 1979, ‘Statistical Inferences for a System of Simultaneous, Non-linear, Implicit Equations in the Context of Instrumental Variable Estimation’, Journal of Econometrics 11, 275-302.
Hansen, J. A., 1992, ‘Innovation, Firm Size and Firm Age’, Small Business Economics 4(l), 37-44.
Kokkelenberg, E. C. and S. V. Nguyen, 1989, ‘Modelling Technical Program and Multifactor Productivity: A Plant Level Example’, Journal of Productivity Analysis 1, 69-90.
Nguyen, S. V. and M. L. Streitwieser, 1998, ‘Factor Substitution in U.S. Manufacturing: Does Plant Size Matter?’, Small Business Economics 12, 41-57.
Nguyen, S. V. and A. P. Reznek, 1991, ‘Returns to Scale in Small and Large U.S.Manufacturing Establishments’, Small Business Economics 1, 29-46. Reprinted in Small Firms and Economic Growth, J. Acs; (ed.), The International Library of Critical Writings in Economics Series, No. 61, 1996.
Pakes, A. and Erikson, 1998, ‘Empirical Implications of Alternative Models of Firm Dynamics’, Journal of Economic Theory 79(1), 1-45.
Storey, D. J., 1994, Understanding the Small Business Sector, London/New York: Routledge.
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1987, The State of Small Business: A Report of the President to the Congress 1987, Washington D.C.: U.S. GovernmentPrinting Office.
Zellner, A., 1963, ‘Estimators of Seemingly Unrelated Regressions: Some Exact Finite Samples Results’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 58, 977-992.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nguyen, S.V., Lee, SH. Returns to Scale in Small and Large U.S. Manufacturing Establishments: Further Evidence. Small Business Economics 19, 41–50 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015714305990
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015714305990