Skip to main content

An Efficiency Comparison of European Banking Systems Operating under Different Environmental Conditions

Abstract

The paper investigates the operating efficiency differences of a sample of commercial banks across 10 European countries. First, the paper analyzes the technical efficiency of each country sample following the “basic” Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model incorporating only banking variables. Then, a “complete” DEA model is introduced, incorporating environmental factors together with the banking variables of the basic model. The comparison between the two models shows that country-specific environmental conditions exercise a strong influence over the behavior of each country's banking industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Allen, L. and A. Rai. (1996). “Operational Efficiency in Banking: An International Comparison.” Journal of Banking and Finance 20, 655-672.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Banker, R. D., A. Charnes and W. W. Cooper. (1984). “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Management Science 30(9), 1078-1092.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Banker, R. D. and R. Morey. (1986). “Efficiency Analysis for Exogenously Fixed Inputs and Outputs.” Operations Research 34(4), 513-521.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Banker, R. D. (1996). “Hypothesis Tests using Data Envelopment Analysis.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 7(2/3), 134-160.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berg, S. A., P. N. D. Bukh and F. R. Førsund. (1995). “Banking Efficiency in the Nordic Countries: A Four-Country Malmquist Index Analysis.” Working Paper, University of Aarhus, Denmark (September).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berg, S., F. R. Førsund, L. Hjalmarson and M. Suominen. (1993). “Banking Efficiency in the Nordic Countries.” Journal of Banking and Finance 17, 371-388.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bergendahl, G. (1995). “DEA and Benchmarks for Nordic Banks.” Working Paper, Gothenburg University, Gothenberg, Sweden (December).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berger, A. N. and R. DeYoung. (1997). “Problem Loans and Cost Efficiency in Commercial Banks.” Journal of Banking and Finance 21(6), 849-870.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berger, A. N. and D. B. Humphrey. (1997). “Efficiency of Financial Institutions: International Survey and Directions for Future Research.” European Journal of Operational Research.

  10. Berger, A. N., D. Hancok and D. B. Humphrey. (1993). “Bank Efficiency Derived from the Profit Function.” Journal of Banking and Finance 17(April), 317-347.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Berger, A. N. and D. B. Humphrey. (1992). “Measurement and Efficiency Issues in Commercial Banking.” In Z. Griliches (ed.), Output Measurement in the Service Sectors. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, Chap. 7, 245-279.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Berger, A. N. and D. B. Humphrey. (1991). “The Dominance of Inefficiencies over Scale and Product Mix Economies in Banking.” Journal of Monetary Economics 28, 117-148.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cooper, W. W. and J. T. Pastor. (1996). “Non-discretionary Variables in DEA: A Revision and a New Approach.” Working Paper, Universidad de Alicante, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes. (1979). “Short Communication: Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units.” European Journal of Operational Research 3(4), 339-354.

    Google Scholar 

  15. DeYoung, R. (1998). “X-Inefficiency and Management Quality in Commercial Banks.” Journal of Financial Services Research 13, 5-22.

    Google Scholar 

  16. DeYoung, R. and I. Hasan. (1998). “The Performance of Denovo Banks: A Profit Efficiency Approach.” Journal of Banking and Finance 22, 565-587.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dietsch, M. and A. Lozano-Vivas. (2000). “How the Environment Determines the Efficiency of Banks: A Comparison between French and Spanish Banking Industry.” Journal of Banking and Finance 24, 985-1004.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Evanoff, D. and P. Israilevich. (1991). “Regional Differences in Bank Efficiency and Technology.” The Annals of Regional Science 25, 41-54.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fecher, F. and P. Pestieau. (1993). “Efficiency and Competition in O.E.C.D. Financial Services.” In H. O. Fried, C. A. K. Lovell and S. S. Schmidt (eds.), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications. U.K.: Oxford University Press, 374-385.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fuentelsaz, L. and V. Salas. (1992). Estudios sobre banca al por menor. Fundación BBV.

  21. Goldberg, L. G. and A. Rai. (1996). “The Structure-Performance Relationship for European Banking.” Journal of Banking and Finance 20, 745-771.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hughes, J. P. and L. Mester. (1993). “A Quality and Risk-Adjusted Cost Function for Banks: Evidence on the 'Too-Big-To-Fail' Doctrine.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 4, 293-316.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jayaratne, J. and P. E. Strahan. (1996). “The Finance-Growth Nexus: Evidence from Bank Branch Deregulation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics August, 641-670.

  24. King, R. G. and R. Levine. (1993). “Finance and Growth: Schumpeter Might Be Right.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 717-737.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Levine, R. (1998). “The Legal Environment, Banks, and Long-Run Economic Growth.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 30, 596-613.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Levine, R. (1999). “Law, Finance, and Economic Growth.” Journal of Financial Intermediation 8, 8-35.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Levine, R. and S. Zervos. (1998). “Stock Markets, Banks, and Economic Growth.” American Economic Review 88, 537-558.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Maudos, J., J. M. Pastor, F. Pérez and J. Quesada. (2001). “Cost and Profit Efficiency in the European Banks.” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, forthcoming.

  29. Mester, L. (1993). “Efficiency in the Savings and Loan Industry.” Journal of Banking and Finance 17(2-3), 267-286.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mester, L. (1997). “Measuring Efficiency at U.S. Banks.” European Journal of Operational Research 98(2), 230-242.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pastor, J. M., F. Pérez and J. Quesada. (1997). “Efficiency Analysis in Banking Firms: An International Comparison.” European Journal of Operational Research 98, 395-407.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pastor, J. T. (1996). “Translation Invariance in Data Envelopment Analysis: A Generalization.” Annals of Operations Research 66, 93-102.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pastor, J. T., J. L. Ruiz and I. Sirvent. (1999). “A Statistical Test for Detecting Influential Observations in DEA.” European Journal of Operational Research 115, 542-554.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pastor, J. T., J. L. Ruiz and I. Sirvent. (2001). “A Statistical Test for Nested Radial DEA Models.” Operations Research, forthcoming.

  35. Rouse, P. (1996). “Alternative Approaches to the Treatment of Environmental Factors in DEA: An Evaluation.” Working Paper, University of Auckland, presented at the II Georgia Productivity Workshop.

  36. Sheldon, G. (2001). “Efficiency and Scale Economies in European Banking: A Cross-Country Comparison.” Working Paper, University of Basle.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lozano-Vivas, A., Pastor, J.T. & Pastor, J.M. An Efficiency Comparison of European Banking Systems Operating under Different Environmental Conditions. Journal of Productivity Analysis 18, 59–77 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015704510270

Download citation

  • efficiency
  • DEA
  • environmental conditions
  • European banking