Skip to main content
Log in

Separating Technical Change from Time-Varying Technical Inefficiency in the Absence of Distributional Assumptions

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes an alternative model for separating technical change from time-varying technical inefficiency. The proposed formulation uses the general index, developed by Baltagi and Griffin (1988), to model technical change in the production frontier function and a quadratic function of time, as in Cornwell, Schmidt and Sickles (1990), to capture the temporal pattern of technical inefficiency. In such a setting, all parameters associated with the rate of technical change and the temporal pattern of technical inefficiency are identified separately. Moreover, the proposed formulation is independent of any distributional assumption concerning the one-sided error term associated with technical inefficiency, and it can be estimated in a single stage with non-linear FGLS. Empirical results based on a translog production frontier, and estimates of technical inefficiency and technical change are presented for the UK dairy sector over the period 1982–1992.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agriculture Departments. (1992). Digest of Agricultural Census Statistics. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agriculture Departments. (1982). United Kingdom Agricultural Statistics. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, M. and B. E. Bravo-Ureta. (1995). “An Econometric Decomposition of Dairy Output Growth.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77, 914-921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, M. and B. E. Bravo-Ureta. (1996). “Technical Efficiency Measures for Dairy Farms Using Panel Data: A Comparison of Alternative Model Specifications.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 7, 399-415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H. and J. M. Griffin. (1988). “A General Index of Technical Change.” Journal of Political Economy 96, 20-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H., J. M. Griffin and D. P. Rich. (1995a). “The Measurement of Firm-specific Indexes of Technical Change.” Review of Economics and Statistics 77, 654-663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H., J. M. Griffin and D. P. Rich. (1995b). “Airline Deregulation: The Cost Pieces of the Puzzle.” International Economic Review 36, 245-258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. E. and T. J. Coelli. (1995). “A Model of Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Production Function for Panel Data.” Empirical Economics 20, 325-332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. E. and T. J. Coelli. (1992). “Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data:With Application to Paddy Farmers in India.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 3, 153-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P. W. (1990). “Decomposing TFP Growth in the Presence of Cost Inefficiency, Non-constant Returns to Scale, and Technological Progress.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 1, 287-299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, C., P. Schmidt and R. C. Sickles. (1990). “Production Frontiers with Cross-Sectional and Time-Series Variation in Efficiency Levels.” Journal of Econometrics 46, 185-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuesta, R. A. (2000). “A Production Model with Firm-Specific Temporal Variation in Technical Inefficiency:With Application to Spanish Dairy Farms.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 13, 139-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryburgh, C. R. and C. J. Doyle. (1995). “Distribution of Research Gains under Different Market Structures: The Impact of Technological Change within the UK Dairy Industry.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 46, 80-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, S. (1991). “Effects of Technological Change and Institutional Reform on Production Growth in Chinese Agriculture.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73, 266-275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fare, R., S. Grosskopf, B. Lindgren and P. Roos. (1992). “Productivity in Swedish Pharmacies 1980-1989: A Non-Parametric Malmquist Approach.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 3, 85-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fare, R., S. Grosskopf, M. Norris and Z. Zhang. (1994). “Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Changes in Industrialized Countries.” American Economic Review 84, 66-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrar, J. and J. Franks. (1998). Economics of Milk Production, England and Wales, 1996/97. Special Studies in Agricultural Economics No. 41, Manchester University.

  • Fecher, F. and P. Pestieau. (1993). “Efficiency and Competition in O.E.C.D. Financial Services.” In H. Fried, C. A. K. Lovell and S. S. Schmidt (eds.), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications. Oxford University Press, 374-385.

  • Giannakas, K., K. C. Tran and V. Tzouvelekas. (2000). “Efficiency, Technological Change and Output Growth in Greek Olive Growing Farms: A Box-Cox Approach.” Applied Economics 32, 909-916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heshmati, A. (1996). “On the Single and Multiple Time Trends Representation of Technical Change.” Applied Economics Letters 3, 495-499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heshmati, A. (1998). “Efficiency Measurement in Rotating Panel Data.” Applied Economics 30, 919-930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heshmati, A. and N. Nafar. (1998). “A Production Analysis of the Manufacturing Industries in Iran.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 59, 183-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C. (1990). “Production Frontiers, Panel Data, and Time-Varying Technical Inefficiency.” Journal of Econometrics 46, 201-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C. (2000). “Estimation and Decomposition of Productivity Change when Production is Not Efficient: A Panel Data Approach.” Econometric Reviews 19, 425-460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C. (2001). “Productivity and Technical Change: Measurement and Testing.” Unpublished manuscript.

  • Kumbhakar, S. C. and A. Heshmati. (1995). “Efficiency Measurement in Swedish Dairy Farms: An Application of Rotating Panel Data, 1976-1988.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77, 660-674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C. and A. Heshmati. (1996). “Technical Change and Total Factor Productivity Growth in Swedish Manufacturing Industries.” Econometric Reviews 15, 275-298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C. and L. Hjalmarsson. (1995). “Decomposing Technical Change with Panel Data: An Application to the Public Sector.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 97, 309-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C. and C. A. K. Lovell. (2000). Stochastic Frontier Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C., S. Ghosh and J. T. McGuckin. (1991). “A Generalized Production Frontier Approach for Estimating Determinants of Inefficiency in US Dairy Farms.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 9, 279-286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C., A. Heshmati and L. Hjalmarsson. (1997). “Temporal Patterns of Technical Efficiency: Results from Competing Models.” International Journal of Industrial Organisation 15, 597-616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C., A. Heshmati and L. Hjalmarsson. (1998). “Parametric Approaches to Productivity Measurement: A Comparison among Alternative Models.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 101, 405-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C., S. Nakamura and A. Heshmati. (2000). “Estimation of Firm-Specific Technological Bias, Technical Change and Total Factor Productivity Growth: A Dual Approach.” Econometric Reviews 19, 493-515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. H. and P. Schmidt. (1993). “A Production Frontier Model with Flexible Temporal Variation in Technical Efficiency.” In H. Fried, C. A. K. Lovell and S. S. Schmidt (eds.), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications. Oxford University Press, 237-255.

  • Lovell, C. A. K. (1996). “Applying Efficiency Measurement Techniques to the Measurement of Productivity Change.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 7, 329-340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milk Marketing Boards. Dairy Facts and Figures, various years, 1983-1994. Thames Ditton: United Kingdom Federation of Milk Marketing Boards.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Economic Division, Welsh Office. (1994a). Farm Business Survey 1982-1993. Colchester: ESRC Data Archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. (1994b). Agriculture in the United Kingdom. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhtar, S. M. and P. J. Dawson. (1990). “Herd Size and Unit Costs of Production in the England and Wales Dairy Sector.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 41, 9-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishimizu, M. and J. M. Page. (1982). “Total Factor Productivity Growth, Technological Progress and Technical Efficiency Change: Dimensions of Productivity Change in Yugoslavia, 1965-1978.” Economic Journal 92, 921-936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reifschneider, D. and R. Stevenson. (1991). “Systematic Departures from the Frontier: A Framework for the Analysis of Firm Inefficiency.” International Economic Review 32, 715-723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, D. and T. Young. (1996). “European Environmental Regulations to Reduce Water Pollution: An Analysis of Their Impact on UK Dairy Farms.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 23, 59-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1957). “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function.” Review of Economics and Statistics 39, 312-320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. (1995). “Productivity Growth, Technological Progress and Technical Efficiency Change in China: A Three Sector Analysis.” Journal of Comparative Economics 21:207-229.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karagiannis, G., Midmore, P. & Tzouvelekas, V. Separating Technical Change from Time-Varying Technical Inefficiency in the Absence of Distributional Assumptions. Journal of Productivity Analysis 18, 23–38 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015700309362

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015700309362

Navigation