Skip to main content
Log in

Sectoral Productivity Growth and R&D Spillovers in the Netherlands

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper assesses empirically whether R&D spillovers are important and whether they originate from domestic or foreign activities. Data for eleven sectors are used to explain the impact on total factor productivity of R&D by the sector itself, by other Dutch sectors and by foreign sectors. We find that both domestic and foreign R&D are significant for the Dutch economy. The elasticity of total factor productivity with respect to R&D is approximately 37% for R&D by a sector, 15% for R&D by other Dutch sectors and 3% for R&D by foreign sectors. Our findings suggest moreover that more R&D speeds up the adoption of foreign technologies. Thus, even for a small open economy as the Netherlands, promoting investment in R&D is appropriate as it both stimulates adoption and generates spillovers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Barro, R.J. (1999), 'Notes on Growth Accounting,' Journal of Economic Growth, 4, pp. 119–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J.I. and P. Mohnen (1994), 'International R&D Spillovers between U.S. and Japanese R&D Intensive Sectors,' NBER Working Paper, No. 4682.

  • Branstetter, L. (1996), 'Are Knowledge Spillovers International or Intranational in Scope? Microeconometric Evidence from the U.S and Japan,' NBER Working Paper, No. 5800.

  • Coe, D.T. and E. Helpman (1995), 'International R&D Spillovers,' European Economic Review, 39, pp. 859–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, D.T., E. Helpman, and A.W. Hoffmaister (1997) 'North-South R&D Spillovers,' Economic Journal, 107, 134–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M. and D.A. Levinthal (1989), 'Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D,' Economic Journal, 99, pp. 569–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J. and S. Kortum (1996), 'Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD,' Journal of International Economics, 40, pp. 251–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht, H.J. (1997), 'International R&D Spillovers, Human Capital and Productivity in OECD Economies: An Empirical Investigation' European Economic Review, 41, pp. 1479–1488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1979), 'Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth,' Bell Journal of Economics, 10, pp. 92–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1992), 'The Search for R&D Spillovers,' Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, pp. 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. and F.R. Lichtenberg (1984), 'Interindustry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth: A reexamination', Review of Economics and Statistics, 66, pp. 324–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groot, H.L.F. de and R. Nahuis (1998), 'Taste for Diversity and Optimality of Economic Growth,' Economic Letters, 58, pp. 291–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.M. and E. Helpman (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Im, K.S., M.H. Pesaran, and Y. Shin (1996), 'Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogenous Panels,' mimeo, University of Cambridge.

  • Jacobs, B., R. Nahuis, and P.J.G. Tang (2000), 'Human Capital R&D, Productivity Growth and Assimilation of Technologies in the Netherlands, in: B. van Ark, S.K. Kuipers and G.H. Kuper (eds.), Productivity, Technology and Economic Growth, Kluwer Academic Press.

  • Jaffe, A.B. (1986), 'Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D,' American Economic Review, 76, pp. 984–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A.B., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson (1993), 'Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations,' Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), pp. 577–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C.I. and J.C. Williams (1998), 'Measuring the Social Return to R&D,' Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4), pp. 1119–1135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, W. (1997), 'Trade and the Transmission of Technology,' NBER Working Paper, No. 6113.

  • Kusters, A. and B. Minne (1992), 'Technologie, Markstruktuur en Internationalisatie: De Ontwikkeling van de Industrie,' CPB Onderzoeksmemorandum, No. 99.

  • Leahy, D. and J.P. Neary (1997), 'R&D Spillovers and the Case for Industrial Policy in an Open Economy,' Oxford Economic Papers, 51(1), 1999, pp. 40–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, F. and B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie (1998), 'International R&D Spillovers: A Comment,' European Economic Review, 42, pp. 1483–1491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Los, B. (1997), 'The Empirical Performance of a New Interindustry Technology Spillover Measurement Measure,' mimeo Maastricht University.

  • Los, B. and B. Verspagen (1996), 'R&D Spillovers and Productivity: Evidence from U.S. Manufacturing Microdata,' Merit Research Memorandum, 2/96–007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R.E., Jr. (1988), 'On the Mechanics of Economic Development', Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, pp. 3–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijl, H. van (1995), Endogenous Technological Change: The Case of Information Technology, PhD. Thesis, Maastricht University.

  • Mohnen, P. (1996), 'R&D Externalities and Productivity Growth,' STI-Review OECD, pp. 39–66.

  • Nadiri, M.I. (1993), 'Innovations and Technological Spillovers,' NBER Working Paper, No. 4423.

  • Nadiri, M.I. and I.R. Prucha (1993), 'Estimation of the Depreciation Rate of Physical and R&D Capital in the U.S. Total Manufacturing Sector,' NBER Working Paper, Vol. 4423.

  • Pakes, A. and M. Schankerman (1984), 'The Rate of Obsolescence of Patents, Research Gestation Lags, and the Private Rate of Return to Research Resources,' in: Z. Griliches (ed.), R&D, Patents and Productivity, Chicago, Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, W.G. (1995), 'International R&D Spillovers and OECD Economic Growth,' Economic Inquiry, XXXIII, pp. 571–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P.M. (1990), 'Endogenous Technological Change', Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), pp. S71–S103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakurai, N., G. Papaconstantinou, and E. Ioannidis (1997), 'Impact of R&D and Technology Diffusion on Productivity Growth: Empirical Evidence for 10 OECD Countries,' Economic Systems Research, (1), pp. 81–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M. (1982), 'Inter-industry Technology Flows and Productivity Measurement,' Review of Economics and Statistics, 64, pp. 627–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soete, L.L.G. and B. ter Weel (1999), 'Innovation, Knowledge Creation and Technology Policy: The Case of the Netherlands', De Economist, 147(3), pp. 293–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verspagen, B. (1997a), 'Measuring Intersectoral Technology Spillovers: Estimates from the European and US Patent Office Databases,' Economic Systems Research, 9,(1), pp. 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verspagen, B. (1997b), 'Estimating International Technology Spillovers Using Technology Flow Matrices,' Welwirtschaftliches Archiv, 133(2), pp. 226–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiel, H. van der (1997), 'Sectorale Productiviteitsgroei in Netherland 1960–1995,' mimeo, CPB Dutch Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, E.N. (1997), 'Spillovers, Linkages and Technical Change,' Economic Systems Research, 9(1), pp. 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. (1996), 'Measuring R&D in Services,' STI Working Papers, 1996:7, OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacobs, B., Nahuis, R. & Tang, P.J. Sectoral Productivity Growth and R&D Spillovers in the Netherlands. De Economist 150, 181–210 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015696202835

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015696202835

Keywords

Navigation