Skip to main content
Log in

Conceptual metaphors and blends of “understanding” and “knowledge” in Hungarian

  • Published:
Acta Linguistica Hungarica

Abstract

This paper combines the theories of conceptual metaphor, blending andthe profile/base relations system of Langacker in interpreting the most importantverbs of “understanding” and “knowledge” in the Hungarianlanguage within the conceptual metaphors understanding is seeing , and understandingis grasping . The analysis demonstrates that the semantic compositions ofverbal prefix + verb play an outstanding role in constructing the expressionsof “understanding” and “knowledge” prior and/or parallelto the metaphoric correspondences. The verbal prefixes build a complex spatialsystem in Hungarian and, combined with verbs of visual and tactile conceptualstructures, represent “understanding” and “knowledge”in a dynamic way, where the target entity of understanding or knowledge istaken as a fully structured object.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benkő, Loránd (ed.). 1993. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der Ungarischen. I. A-Kop. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkő, Loránd (ed.). 1995. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der Ungarischen. II. Kor-Zs. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijk, Teun A. van. 1980. Macrostructures. An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmore, John. 1992. Thunder in the gap. In: John Dinsmore (ed.): The symbolic and connectionist paradigms, 1-24. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • É. Kiss, Katalin. 1995. NP movement, operator movement, and scrambling in Hungarian. In: Katalin É. Kiss (ed.): Discourse configurational languages, 207-43. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994 [1985]. Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, Gilles-Mark Turner. 1996. Blending as a central process of grammar. In: A. Goldberg (ed.): Conceptual structure, discourse, and language, 183-203. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, Jerry A. 1984. The modularity of mind. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grady, Joseph E.-Todd Oakly-Seana Coulson. 1999. Blending and metaphor. In: R.W. Gibbs Jr.-G.J. Steen (eds): Metaphor in cognitive linguistics, 101-24. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, Phillip N. 1983. Mental models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, Ferenc. 2000. Jelentéselmélet [A theory of meaning]. Corvina, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, Ferenc-Mária Ladányi. 2000. Az igekötők [The verbal prefixes]. In: Ferenc Kiefer (ed.): Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 3. Morfológia [A structural grammar of Hungarian 3. Morphology], 475-80. Akadémia Kiadó, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kugler, Nóra. 2000. Az ige jelentése [The meaning of the verb]. In: Borbála Keszler (ed.): Magyar grammatika [Hungarian grammar], 82-3. Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George-Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Concept, image, symbol: the cognitive basis of grammar. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin-New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, Ronald W. 1999. Grammar and conceptualization. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin-New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, David. 1982. Vision: A computation investigation into the human processing of visual information. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. L.-D.E. Rumelhart (eds). 1986. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 2. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, Monika. 1992. Einführung in die Kognitive Linguistik. Francke, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöström, Sören. 1998. From vision to cognition. A study of metaphor and polysemy. In: J. Allwood-P. Gärdenfors (eds): Cognitive semantics. Meaning and cognition. (Pragmatics and Beyond. New Series 55.), 66-85. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohner, Hans. 1990. Textverstehen. Kognitive und kommunikative Grundlagen der Sprachverarbeitung. Westdeutcher Verlag, Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweetser, Eve. 1999. Compositionality and blending: semantic composition in a cognitively realistic framework. In: T. Janssen-R. Redeker (eds): Cognitive linguistics: foundations, scope, and methodology, 129-62. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin-New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, John R. 1991. Linguistic categorization. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tolcsvai Nagy, G. Conceptual metaphors and blends of “understanding” and “knowledge” in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 48, 79–100 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015691321254

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015691321254

Keywords

Navigation