Abstract
This paper combines the theories of conceptual metaphor, blending andthe profile/base relations system of Langacker in interpreting the most importantverbs of “understanding” and “knowledge” in the Hungarianlanguage within the conceptual metaphors understanding is seeing , and understandingis grasping . The analysis demonstrates that the semantic compositions ofverbal prefix + verb play an outstanding role in constructing the expressionsof “understanding” and “knowledge” prior and/or parallelto the metaphoric correspondences. The verbal prefixes build a complex spatialsystem in Hungarian and, combined with verbs of visual and tactile conceptualstructures, represent “understanding” and “knowledge”in a dynamic way, where the target entity of understanding or knowledge istaken as a fully structured object.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benkő, Loránd (ed.). 1993. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der Ungarischen. I. A-Kop. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
Benkő, Loránd (ed.). 1995. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der Ungarischen. II. Kor-Zs. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
Dijk, Teun A. van. 1980. Macrostructures. An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
Dinsmore, John. 1992. Thunder in the gap. In: John Dinsmore (ed.): The symbolic and connectionist paradigms, 1-24. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
É. Kiss, Katalin. 1995. NP movement, operator movement, and scrambling in Hungarian. In: Katalin É. Kiss (ed.): Discourse configurational languages, 207-43. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994 [1985]. Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Fauconnier, Gilles-Mark Turner. 1996. Blending as a central process of grammar. In: A. Goldberg (ed.): Conceptual structure, discourse, and language, 183-203. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA.
Fodor, Jerry A. 1984. The modularity of mind. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Grady, Joseph E.-Todd Oakly-Seana Coulson. 1999. Blending and metaphor. In: R.W. Gibbs Jr.-G.J. Steen (eds): Metaphor in cognitive linguistics, 101-24. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
Johnson-Laird, Phillip N. 1983. Mental models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kiefer, Ferenc. 2000. Jelentéselmélet [A theory of meaning]. Corvina, Budapest.
Kiefer, Ferenc-Mária Ladányi. 2000. Az igekötők [The verbal prefixes]. In: Ferenc Kiefer (ed.): Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 3. Morfológia [A structural grammar of Hungarian 3. Morphology], 475-80. Akadémia Kiadó, Budapest.
Kugler, Nóra. 2000. Az ige jelentése [The meaning of the verb]. In: Borbála Keszler (ed.): Magyar grammatika [Hungarian grammar], 82-3. Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest.
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lakoff, George-Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Concept, image, symbol: the cognitive basis of grammar. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin-New York.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1999. Grammar and conceptualization. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin-New York.
Marr, David. 1982. Vision: A computation investigation into the human processing of visual information. Freeman, San Francisco.
McClelland, J. L.-D.E. Rumelhart (eds). 1986. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 2. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Schwarz, Monika. 1992. Einführung in die Kognitive Linguistik. Francke, Tübingen.
Sjöström, Sören. 1998. From vision to cognition. A study of metaphor and polysemy. In: J. Allwood-P. Gärdenfors (eds): Cognitive semantics. Meaning and cognition. (Pragmatics and Beyond. New Series 55.), 66-85. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
Strohner, Hans. 1990. Textverstehen. Kognitive und kommunikative Grundlagen der Sprachverarbeitung. Westdeutcher Verlag, Opladen.
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sweetser, Eve. 1999. Compositionality and blending: semantic composition in a cognitively realistic framework. In: T. Janssen-R. Redeker (eds): Cognitive linguistics: foundations, scope, and methodology, 129-62. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin-New York.
Taylor, John R. 1991. Linguistic categorization. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tolcsvai Nagy, G. Conceptual metaphors and blends of “understanding” and “knowledge” in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 48, 79–100 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015691321254
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015691321254